NY/San Antonio

Moderators: Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX

lowermerionfilms
Senior
Posts: 748
And1: 13
Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Contact:

NY/San Antonio 

Post#1 » by lowermerionfilms » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:42 pm

New York Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Robert Horry
Brent Barry
San Antonio 2008 1st Round Pick

San Antonio Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Mardy Collins
Eddy Curry

Why for SA? Strapped by the huge contracts for Duncan, Ginobli and Parker, the Spurs can't afford to let contracts expire. It limits their trading ability. Curry may look like crap playing 35 minutes for the worst team in the league, but 25-30 minutes off the bench at the 5 could be just what the Spurs need in the playoffs (think James Edwards for the Pistons in the late 80's, early 90's)

Why for NY? Randolph seems untradable and one of these two guys has to go. The Knicks pick up a 1st round pick and bring the Curry fiasco to an end.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#2 » by loserX » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:46 pm

The Spurs are arguably the most chemistry-conscious team in the league. I doubt the moody, inconsistent-effort Curry is how they'd like to use their capspace or draft picks.
User avatar
ss1986v2
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
 

 

Post#3 » by ss1986v2 » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:58 pm

spurs pass without much thought. not that the value isnt on their side, but its not the type of move they are going to pull.
Stupidity Should be Painful!
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,321
And1: 10,082
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#4 » by Blame Rasho » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:04 pm

It is just a laughable proposal and your logic is so flawed. Tell me why we need another post scorer when we have a better one in Duncan? Hell, Tony Parker scores better from inside compared to Curry according to 82games.com. We need outside shooters to accent our big three. What do we trade, the guy with the best TS% in the NBA and the one guy who is money in the playoffs. We can't afford to let contracts expire now? Where did you hear that? The Spurs have always been able to reload and get pieces for their team. This trade is horriable when you also consider what it does to the chemistry to the team this year.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#5 » by old rem » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:11 pm

loserX wrote:The Spurs are arguably the most chemistry-conscious team in the league. I doubt the moody, inconsistent-effort Curry is how they'd like to use their capspace or draft picks.


This is true....and yet here is a pretty golden opportunity they can't get picking so late in drafts. The Spurs do quite well at getting players focused and schooled,in shape,thinking D. I always wonder....how hard is it to explain to a guy the benefits of paying the dues to become a STAR rather than a guy coasting on raw talent. Sometimes a coaching staff can do as much with applied psychology as it can with tactics.

Collins is a player I think can also be made into more than he's been. I think even if the Spurs also send Elson,they take a gamble that can pay off. It might take Elson (or no Collins) to really sell the Knicks.

Z Randolph is not "untradeable" but has real weak market value for a 20/10,relatively young PF. As is the case with Curry,dropping 15 pounds and putting more priority on D would make a big difference. What's painfully clear is that untill Curry or Randolph do lose a few pounds and gain some game on the defensive end-it's not good to play them togather.
CENSORED... No comment.
#1knickfan
Banned User
Posts: 3,590
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#6 » by #1knickfan » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:18 am

TD is the MAN wrote: Hell, Tony Parker scores better from inside compared to Curry according to 82games.com.


You would think that would be enough for a moderator to figure out that 82games.com is a place full of imaginary stats created by tabulated by someone with too much time on his hands that despite his best efforts mean absolutely nothing in real life.

New York Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Robert Horry
Brent Barry
San Antonio 2008 1st Round Pick

San Antonio Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Mardy Collins
Eddy Curry


As for the deal itself, I would turn down that trade in a heartbeat. We're already giving up the best player in the deal but we're also giving up Collins to boot. And for what, salary cap relief that won't help us anytime soon and a glorified second rounder? :roll:
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#7 » by DanTown8587 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:24 am

NO Way Spurs want Eddy "Malcontent" Curry on their roster for four years.
...
HotSpurs21
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

 

Post#8 » by HotSpurs21 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:31 am

just not a good deal for the Spurs. loserX said it best, this is not the way the Spurs want to use their cap space and draft picks
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#9 » by moocow007 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:32 am

DanTown8587 wrote:NO Way Spurs want Eddy "Malcontent" Curry on their roster for four years.


How exactly is Eddy Curry a "malcontent" again? Because he hinted at what was obvious to everyone with half a brain (that having him and Randolph is not working out)? Because he feels that the Knicks play better when he's more involved and that he plays better when he gets the ball (which is also about as obvious as it gets since his strength is offense)? Or is it because he's a Knick? Maybe it's because he's got a bad heart? Or that he's overweight? What is it? I'm guessing Marbury has some hand in this as well (after all Marbury is the root of most of the ills with not just the Knicks but the world too).
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#10 » by moocow007 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:33 am

HotSpurs21 wrote:just not a good deal for the Spurs. loserX said it best, this is not the way the Spurs want to use their cap space and draft picks


Yes. Curry doesn't seem like a Spurs type player. But if you are going to gamble, they aren't giving much of anything here, so this would not be a bad gamble.
HotSpurs21
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

 

Post#11 » by HotSpurs21 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:36 am

^ yeah talent-wise the Spurs win out by far in this trade, but I just don't see Pops playing Curry much until he commits himself on defense
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#12 » by loserX » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:37 am

moocow007 wrote:How exactly is Eddy Curry a "malcontent" again? Because he hinted at what was obvious to everyone with half a brain (that having him and Randolph is not working out)? Because he feels that the Knicks play better when he's more involved and that he plays better when he gets the ball (which is also about as obvious as it gets since his strength is offense)? Or is it because he's a Knick? Maybe it's because he's got a bad heart? Or that he's overweight? What is it? I'm guessing Marbury has some hand in this as well (after all Marbury is the root of most of the ills with not just the Knicks but the world too).


Oh come on, now. We all know that Curry has been FAR from an ideal "employee" ever since his Chicago days, long BEFORE he got to NY. He's moody, his effort level is erratic to say the least, and he often appears disinterested. This has nothing to do with Marbury or an attack on the Knicks or his weight. There's little point in getting defensive or trying to deny it.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#13 » by moocow007 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:38 am

HotSpurs21 wrote:^ yeah talent-wise the Spurs win out by far in this trade, but I just don't see Pops playing Curry much until he commits himself on defense


Oh I agree. And not like the Spurs really need to gamble right now. They are still one of the top 4 teams in the NBA. Once they are all healthy they'll be just fine...more than just fine.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,321
And1: 10,082
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#14 » by Blame Rasho » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:48 am

You would think that would be enough for a moderator to figure out that 82games.com is a place full of imaginary stats created by tabulated by someone with too much time on his hands that despite his best efforts mean absolutely nothing in real life.


I am glad to know according to you that site is useless...
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#15 » by moocow007 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:53 am

TD is the MAN wrote:
You would think that would be enough for a moderator to figure out that 82games.com is a place full of imaginary stats created by tabulated by someone with too much time on his hands that despite his best efforts mean absolutely nothing in real life.


I am glad to know according to you that site is useless...


To be fair though I believe it was 82games.com that had Royal Ivey as being the more productive player than Stephon Marbury several years back (during Marbs Suns days) based on some weird calculation. I don't remember the specifics but it was pretty wild when it was brought up. Now Marbury is no Nash or Kidd but Royal Ivey is no Marbury (and I don't mean that as a compliment).

:D
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,321
And1: 10,082
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#16 » by Blame Rasho » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:55 am

moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



To be fair though I believe it was 82games.com that had Royal Ivey as being the more productive player than Stephon Marbury several years back (during Marbs Suns days) based on some weird calculation. I don't remember the specifics but it was pretty wild when it was brought up. Now Marbury is no Nash or Kidd but Royal Ivey is no Marbury (and I don't mean that as a compliment).

:D


I see what you mean :wink:

Return to Trades and Transactions