Minnesota Timberwolves
MN speeds up their rebuilding by taking Marbury's deal.
Incoming Players
Randolph Morris
Salary: $810,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 5.0 REB: 0.0 AST: 0.0 PER: 45.88
Mardy Collins
Salary: $967,320 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 1.6 REB: 1.4 AST: 1.2 PER: 1.62
Stephon Marbury
Salary: $19,012,500 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 13.9 REB: 2.4 AST: 4.6 PER: 14.63
Fred Jones
Salary: $3,300,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 6.1 REB: 2.2 AST: 2.1 PER: 10.62
Outgoing Players: Greg Buckner, Theo Ratliff, Antoine Walker, Marko Jaric
New York Knicks
NY moves Marbury and saves some money initially and gets a pass first guy to add to a me-first dominated lineup.
Incoming Players
Greg Buckner
Salary: $3,750,746 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 5.0 REB: 2.4 AST: 1.6 PER: 7.81
Theo Ratliff
Salary: $11,666,666 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 8.2 REB: 4.5 AST: 0.8 PER: 13.75
Antoine Walker
Salary: $8,329,640 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 9.5 REB: 3.9 AST: 1.1 PER: 13.06
Marko Jaric
Salary: $6,050,000 Years Remaining: 4
PTS: 9.3 REB: 2.6 AST: 4.3 PER: 13.24
Outgoing Players: Randolph Morris, Mardy Collins, Stephon Marbury, Fred Jones
Wolves and Knicks
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Wolves and Knicks
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,496
- And1: 99
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
I admire your persistence, but for the umpteenth time:
- the Wolves are not trading Ratliff's expiring for Marbury's one year extra, because it will plow them into the luxury tax and chew up almost all the savings they get elsewhere (and possibly cost them young players they can't re-sign)
- the Knicks have little interest in taking on those longer-term contracts for limited players, much less give up guys they actually want to keep (like Collins and Jones) to get them.
It's just flawed logically, shag, and swapping out bit parts here and there is NEVER going to make it work.
- the Wolves are not trading Ratliff's expiring for Marbury's one year extra, because it will plow them into the luxury tax and chew up almost all the savings they get elsewhere (and possibly cost them young players they can't re-sign)
- the Knicks have little interest in taking on those longer-term contracts for limited players, much less give up guys they actually want to keep (like Collins and Jones) to get them.
It's just flawed logically, shag, and swapping out bit parts here and there is NEVER going to make it work.
Return to Trades and Transactions