lal,den,phi

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

User avatar
chefy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,014
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 14, 2006

lal,den,phi 

Post#1 » by chefy » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:00 am

lal

camby

den

dalembert,miller

phi

kleiza,turiaf,lal's 2nd,brown(expiring),najera(expiring)

Trade ID #4406283

:clap:
sec-106
Analyst
Posts: 3,151
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 15, 2007

 

Post#2 » by sec-106 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:04 am

Sixers pass.
Salvistine24
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 24, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Salvistine24 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:05 am

no from philly...those are two of our best trade chips at the moment and we need atleast an above average young prospect back or a 1st round pick even if u make the point that daly is overpaid...if u think his value has increased, then him nd miller should fetch a good young player (not great, just a solid guy), a mid to late 1st, and some expirings

this doesnt do it bc kleiza isnt a good enough prospect and a lal 2nd can just be bought on draft nite...
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#4 » by VintaGe36 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:23 am

lol.

Turiaf and 2nd = Camby!?!

FAT CHANCE.

you REALLY need to think out your trades.
User avatar
chefy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,014
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 14, 2006

 

Post#5 » by chefy » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:29 am

VintaGe36 wrote:lol.

Turiaf and 2nd = Camby!?!

FAT CHANCE.

you REALLY need to think out your trades.



huh?

den gets miller and dally

not turiaf and a 2nd
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#6 » by VintaGe36 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:30 am

LAL gets Camby for Turiaf and a 2nd.


NOT A CHANCE Camby is gotten that cheaply.
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#7 » by FlawlessVictory » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:24 am

L.A. gets Camby for Kwame, Turiaf, and a 2nd. Still far too cheap, but that is still significantly different because there aren't that many 9kk+ expirings in the NBA at the moment.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

 

Post#8 » by killbuckner » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:30 am

big expiring contracts aren't worth any more than several smaller expirings. Its funny to me how some fans miss this point
Nutty Nats Fan
RealGM
Posts: 10,439
And1: 7,081
Joined: Aug 12, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Nutty Nats Fan » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:29 am

A big no way from Denver. Najera is more than just an expiring contract, but a large part of the front court rotation. There is no way they are moving him and Camby, especially if it brings in one center.. not nearly as good as Camby. Dre can't play PF or C. Kleiza is a really good young player.

This is really really bad for Denver, sorry.
JBuisness21
Sophomore
Posts: 106
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

 

Post#10 » by JBuisness21 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:51 pm

Let me tell you something and this isto everybody else on this forum Nuggets have 3 untouchables in nene melo and kleiza so all these trades saying nuggets getting rid of nene's horrible contract are idiots they signed him to that deal because he is there center of the future! :wavefinger: :wavefinger: :wavefinger:
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,918
And1: 1,462
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

 

Post#11 » by DaFan334 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:28 pm

JBuisness21 wrote:Let me tell you something and this isto everybody else on this forum Nuggets have 3 untouchables in nene melo and kleiza so all these trades saying nuggets getting rid of nene's horrible contract are idiots they signed him to that deal because he is there center of the future! :wavefinger: :wavefinger: :wavefinger:


LK isnt even close to untouchable. Theres a good chance he would have higher value in a trade simply because he is a 3 and time at the 3 is always hard to find behind melo. The guy could do alot more if he wasnt out of position all of the time as he usually is with the Nugs.

Return to Trades and Transactions