Miami/New Jersey/LA Clippers 8 Player Swap...

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

pja123
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,080
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 17, 2001
Contact:

Miami/New Jersey/LA Clippers 8 Player Swap... 

Post#1 » by pja123 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:56 am

Heat get:
Sean Williams
Jamaal Magloire
Jason Collins
Sam Cassell
2008 1st round pick (via NJ)

Nets get:
Shaquille O'Neal
Corey Maggette

Clipps get:
Vince Carter
Smush Parker


WHY IT COULD WORK FOR THE HEAT:
They off-load Shaq's bloated contract and get back a package of expiring deals and young talent. Sean Williams is an athletic big man with great shot blocking skills. He would be a good piece to compliment Wade in the Heat's new era. They also get a 1st round pick to aid in the youth movement.
HEAT LINE-UP:
PG-Cassell/Williams
SG-Wade/Cook
SF-Wright/Davis
PF-Haslem/Barron
C-Williams/Magloire/Collins

WHY IT COULD WORK FOR THE NETS:
They go for it all with this move. A quartet of Kidd, Maggs, RJ, and Shaq would make NJ a serious threat for the Eastern crown. O'Neal is from the area, so it would make sense for him to end his career as a net.
NETS LINE-UP:
PG-Kidd/Armstrong/Williams
SG-Maggs/Wright
SF-Jefferson/Nachbar
PF-Kristic/Boone
C-O'Neal/Allen

WHY IT COULD WORK FOR THE CLIPPS:
They get some star power with the addition of Carter. When Brand finally returns healthy, the Clipps would have a formidable combo to work with.
CLIPPS LINE-UP:
PG-Dickau/Knight/Parker
SG-Carter/Mobley/Ross
SF-Thornton/Thomas
PF-Brand/Williams
C-Kaman/Davis
Flash is the Future
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 26, 2006

 

Post#2 » by Flash is the Future » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:58 am

I'd do it for the Heat. And the Nets can keep their first.
Image
LiquidFire
Banned User
Posts: 3,275
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2007

 

Post#3 » by LiquidFire » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:03 am

after looking at this for the nets... i seriously have to go poop right now. brb
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,897
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#4 » by ecuhus1981 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:09 am

Tempting without the 1st, and very similar to my proposal...
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
Big Dee Chi-Born
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,669
And1: 97
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
         

 

Post#5 » by Big Dee Chi-Born » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:07 am

No way the Heat take that crap for Shaq! It's funny how quickly people forget how Shaq carried the Heat to the playoffs last season with Wade out! :noway:
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,289
And1: 18,395
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#6 » by BBallFreak » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:52 am

I probably would need the pick from New Jersey, but as a fellow Heat fan of mine would say - run it!

We'd have enough cap room to sign a max free agent (as we'd only have $40 million committed for next season), our own lottery pick, Sean Williams, and we'd be able to send New Jersey's pick to Minnesota to satisfy the ill-fated Ricky Davis trade.

Edit: We also save $4.5834 million on the season, helping Riley accomplish his goal of getting under the tax thresh hold. We could deal J-Will to Golden State for Pietrus and their TPE and end up exactly where we want to be...
User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

 

Post#7 » by Hoops23 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:12 am

I like the trade for Miami but I doubt the trade to happen because Riley is not going to trade Shaq. Riley is so attach to his star players.
Clip34life
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 19, 2002

sure 

Post#8 » by Clip34life » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:40 pm

Clips say yes. After they cut Smush Parker.
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,289
And1: 18,395
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: sure 

Post#9 » by BBallFreak » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:40 pm

Clip34life wrote:Clips say yes. After they cut Smush Parker.


For which, we thank you...
Clip34life
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 19, 2002

Re: sure 

Post#10 » by Clip34life » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:24 pm

BBallFreak wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



For which, we thank you...

:nod:
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#11 » by loflin3hree5ive » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:59 pm

good trade for all imo. heat won't get much more than that for shaq.
Flash is the Future
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 26, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Flash is the Future » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:05 pm

BBallFreak wrote:I probably would need the pick from New Jersey, but as a fellow Heat fan of mine would say - run it!

We'd have enough cap room to sign a max free agent (as we'd only have $40 million committed for next season), our own lottery pick, Sean Williams, and we'd be able to send New Jersey's pick to Minnesota to satisfy the ill-fated Ricky Davis trade.
Edit: We also save $4.5834 million on the season, helping Riley accomplish his goal of getting under the tax thresh hold. We could deal J-Will to Golden State for Pietrus and their TPE and end up exactly where we want to be...

I don't think so. Does it say that in Larry Coon's CBA site?
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,297
And1: 25,460
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#13 » by hermes » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:08 pm

Big Dee Chi-Born wrote:No way the Heat take that crap for Shaq! It's funny how quickly people forget how Shaq carried the Heat to the playoffs last season with Wade out! :noway:
that was the shaq of last year
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#14 » by loserX » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:56 pm

BBallFreak wrote:We'd have enough cap room to sign a max free agent (as we'd only have $40 million committed for next season), our own lottery pick, Sean Williams, and we'd be able to send New Jersey's pick to Minnesota to satisfy the ill-fated Ricky Davis trade.


I don't think you can do that. You didn't have the rights to that NJ pick when you made the Minny deal, so you can't use it afterwards to satisfy the obligation. Miami traded the rights to their OWN pick, lotto-protected, to Minnesota, not the rights to whatever-pick-they-might-end-up-acquiring.

(Unless, of course, Minny decides they want a pick this year and trades the Miami pick rights back to the Heat for the NJ pick. But I doubt that happens either.)
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,289
And1: 18,395
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#15 » by BBallFreak » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:45 pm

I don't think you're correct on this loserX.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#16 » by loserX » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:51 pm

BBallFreak wrote:I don't think you're correct on this loserX.


That is entirely possible :D

My guess is that the rule that I'm assuming is in place is there precisely to prevent what you're suggesting the Heat do. The Wolves have a shot at a pretty good pick from Miami, even if it's not this year...I think they would be pretty choked if, say, Miami were allowed to go out and just buy a pick from Phoenix and say "here, have the 29th pick, now go away" after the fact. (I know Phoenix doesn't have their pick this year, but you get my meaning.) If that were allowed, I'm assuming the Knicks would have used that provision to get out of the Jazz pick-debt a long time ago.

Again, this is purely assumption on my part...anyone have a link that confirms or denies?
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,289
And1: 18,395
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#17 » by BBallFreak » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:58 pm

I just posed the question on the CBA board. We'll see what they have to say.

Return to Trades and Transactions