Bibby for Camby straight up

Rasheed36 · Post #1 » by **Rasheed36** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:12 am

Sac trades- Mike Bibby
Sac Receives- Marcus Camby

Den trades- Marcus Camby
Den Receives- Mike Bibby

Sac- Get a defensive big that fills their needs and expires with their other long term deals. Artest and Camby 2 former DPOY would shut teams down up and down the court.

C- Camby/Hawes
PF- Miller/Moore
SF- Artest/Garcia
SG-Martin/Salmons
PG- Udrih/Douby

Den- Get their playmaker PG that is capable of putting up 20 any night if AI and Melo aren't playing well. This allows AI to move to his more natural position SG.

C- Nene/Hunter
PF- Martin/Najera
SF- Melo//Kleiza
SG- AI/JR
PG- Bibby/Carter

stevebozell · Post #2 » by **stevebozell** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:14 am

no way in hell Denver does that.

vincanity1 · Post #3 » by **vincanity1** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:14 am

Camby is probably too valuable for the Nuggets.

Bac2Basics · Post #4 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:16 am

It's an interesting idea, and I think if Sacramento was going in a different direction than most of us think they are they might consider it, but I don't see it happening.

Post #5 » by **dockingsched** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:19 am

awful for the nuggets especially with nene's unknown future.

Post #6 » by **KF10** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:20 am

A Bibby/AI/Anthony combo will be the BEST offensive trio in the NBA IMO...(Could drop 80 points in any given night) But looking at the defensive view...yeah...not pretty...(Even though, Bibby IMPROVED his defense)

yungal07 · Post #7 » by **yungal07** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:33 am

Bac2Basics wrote:It's an interesting idea, and I think if Sacramento was going in a different direction than most of us think they are they might consider it, but I don't see it happening.

LOL at the Kings maybe being interested...

If they were offered Camby for Bibby, the Maloof Brothers would personally help Bibby pack his bags...

Bac2Basics · Post #8 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:41 am

yungal07 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
LOL at the Kings maybe being interested...
If they were offered Camby for Bibby, the Maloof Brothers would personally help Bibby pack his bags...

Camby isn't a rebuilding piece and based on some of the things that Petrie has said it seems like the Kings brass seems more committed to rebuilding. They're still patient about it, but I think it's clear they're fully in that camp.

Nutty Nats Fan · Post #9 » by **Nutty Nats Fan** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:01 am

Nuggets PF/C after deal: Najera, K-mart, Nene, Hunter (if Karl ever plays him).

No way Denver does this. It leaves them way too thin up front. Hunter is coming back from an injury, Najera is playing hurt, K-mart has been solid, and Nene is somewhat unknown at this point.

So doesn't matter if this is great value for Camby (I think it isn't), it won't happen.

gusyouout · Post #10 » by **gusyouout** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:47 am

makes no sense for denver. they'd be giving up their most valuable big man/player and get a pg that they don't really need. i'd think denver would much rather move ai to the point than trade camby away.

Post #11 » by **VintaGe36** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:49 am

Bac2Basics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Camby isn't a rebuilding piece and based on some of the things that Petrie has said it seems like the Kings brass seems more committed to rebuilding. They're still patient about it, but I think it's clear they're fully in that camp.

Even if your rebuilding, Camby could fetch more than Bibby.

Cammo101 · Post #12 » by **Cammo101** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:23 am

Bac2Basics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Camby isn't a rebuilding piece and based on some of the things that Petrie has said it seems like the Kings brass seems more committed to rebuilding. They're still patient about it, but I think it's clear they're fully in that camp.

I just got beat to death in a thread by Sacramento fans who swore up and down the Kings are not rebuilding. They were just waiting to get healthy and make the playoffs. :crazy:

Post #13 » by **pillwenney** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:55 am

VintaGe36 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Even if your rebuilding, Camby could fetch more than Bibby.

Bingo. We cream our collective pants at this offer.

Whether or not the Kings are rebuilding is up in the air. I think we are looking to rebuild, but with the attitude that we're not looking to trade any of our guys no matter what, and that we'll just get the best value we can. Instead, we're looking to rebuild with trades and thus holding out for maximum value. That's my opinion, from what I can tell of the situation. I think Petrie would rather primarily rebuild through trades for proven talent than through the draft.

SactownHrtBrks8 · Post #14 » by **SactownHrtBrks8** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:10 pm

Kings take it, no take backs. ill back the bags for both players

sackings916 · Post #15 » by **sackings916** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:17 pm

Camby+Brad Miller frontline =

Post #16 » by **The Rebel** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:28 pm

That is horrible for the Nuggets.