2 separate NYK deals - with MIN and SEA

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

azlakers1989
Ballboy
Posts: 6
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 13, 2008

2 separate NYK deals - with MIN and SEA 

Post#1 » by azlakers1989 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:28 pm

4421985

New York gets: Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff
Minnesota gets: Nate Robinson and Zach Randolph

4421998

New York gets: Damien Wilkins, Earl Watson, and Wally Szczerbiak
Seattle gets: Stephon Marbury and David Lee
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,270
And1: 19,275
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: 2 separate NYK deals - with MIN and SEA 

Post#2 » by shrink » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:31 pm

azlakers1989 wrote:4421985

New York gets: Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff
Minnesota gets: Nate Robinson and Zach Randolph

4421998

New York gets: Damien Wilkins, Earl Watson, and Wally Szczerbiak
Seattle gets: Stephon Marbury and David Lee


For the MIN one, I won't say whether its fair or not, but I doubt it will happen.

MIN cares about money, and I don't think they can afford the financial hit.

NYK cares about talent, and I don't think they can afford the talent hit.
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#3 » by kandiking » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:32 pm

is zach randolph really only worth an expiring? plus minnesota already has one of that type player in al jefferson
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#4 » by deeney0 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:40 pm

Ha, no reason for the Wolves to do that.
User avatar
gavran
RealGM
Posts: 18,156
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2005
Location: crossing the line

 

Post#5 » by gavran » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:53 pm

MIN has the athletic versoin of Randolph, why would they want the original?
KyleCleric
Rookie
Posts: 1,135
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 01, 2007

 

Post#6 » by KyleCleric » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:20 pm

gavran wrote:MIN has the athletic versoin of Randolph, why would they want the original?


I think you may be doing Big Al a disservice by comparing him to Randolph.

1) Big Al is hardly athletic, so characterizing him as such would not be fair.

2) Big Al is a pure post player, one of the few in the league and one of the best. Randolph is not really that kind of player. He's more like a wannabe outside scoring big in the fashion of a KG or Chris Bosh, but lacks the athleticism.

3) Al Jefferson is one of the top 25 players in the NBA (if the Wolves had another in the top 100, they could actually do something). Zach Randolph is no where near as good of a player as Al Jefferson.

4) Al Jefferson will never be considered a great defensive player, but he is more than adequate. Zach Randolph is not.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#7 » by deeney0 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:29 pm

KyleCleric wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
4) Al Jefferson will never be considered a great defensive player, but he is more than adequate. Zach Randolph is not.


Disagree with both points. Right now, I'd say adequate is pushing it - he's got a ways to go to be 'more than adequate'. But he's improving, and I would hesitate to say that he's never going to be considered a great defensive player - he's got tools, give it a few years and it's a possibility.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,455
And1: 18,878
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

 

Post#8 » by KnicksGadfly » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:39 pm

KyleCleric wrote:
2) Big Al is a pure post player, one of the few in the league and one of the best. Randolph is not really that kind of player. He's more like a wannabe outside scoring big in the fashion of a KG or Chris Bosh, but lacks the athleticism.


Athleticism is nonexistent yes...not a post player? Zach's a post player...trust me on that.
#1knickfan
Banned User
Posts: 3,590
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

Re: 2 separate NYK deals - with MIN and SEA 

Post#9 » by #1knickfan » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:04 pm

azlakers1989 wrote:4421985

New York gets: Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff
Minnesota gets: Nate Robinson and Zach Randolph

4421998

New York gets: Damien Wilkins, Earl Watson, and Wally Szczerbiak
Seattle gets: Stephon Marbury and David Lee


First trade is obviously a trade the Knicks wouldn't nor shouldn't make but that doesn't mean its one the Twolves should make either. They have even more reason not to do it.

There is no reason for the Knicks to make that deal with the Sonics. None whatsoever.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by revprodeji » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:46 pm

As a 4 Al is an average defender. At the 5 he is beatup. but he is fine at the 4 for defense.

I would say he is athletic. Not KG athletic, but considering his size he is plenty athletic. He jumps for rebounds and blocks and has huge dunks.

But I appreciate the defense of Al Kyle.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
FARMERMAN10
Veteran
Posts: 2,754
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2005

 

Post#11 » by FARMERMAN10 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:49 pm

Sonics don't want anything to do with Stephon Marbury, although getting lee would be nice.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,270
And1: 19,275
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#12 » by shrink » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:56 pm

revprodeji wrote:As a 4 Al is an average defender. At the 5 he is beatup. but he is fine at the 4 for defense.

I would say he is athletic. Not KG athletic, but considering his size he is plenty athletic. He jumps for rebounds and blocks and has huge dunks.


Man were we spoiled.

Return to Trades and Transactions