LAL / IND / SEA (Updated, v2)

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

LAL / IND / SEA (Updated, v2) 

Post#1 » by FlawlessVictory » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:56 am

Lakers In:
Jeff Foster
Kurt Thomas
Damien Wilkins

Lakers Out:
Kwame Brown
'08 1st Rounder (LAL)
'08 2nd Rounder (CHA)
Sasha Vujacic
Chris Mihm
Cash Considerations

Why for Lakers:
They get the second big body they desperately need. Kurt Thomas can play the PF when Andrew gets back and drastically upgrade the front line. Odom / Thomas / Bynum is probably one of the better rebounding frontlines... ever. Kurt is perfect for the Tri, and Foster would be GREAT off the bench in the future. For now, the trade allows the Lakers to get two bigs for one and convert Kwame's big expiring into something more useful. I also like Wilkins(for his defense, athleticism, and versatility) and apparently Seattle doesn't. He can be removed (along with Sasha) if necessary. Though the Lakers probably wouldn't send cash in that event(because I think we'd value Wilkins as a positive over Sasha).

Sonics In:
Kwame Brown
'08 1st Rounder
Sasha Vujacic
Cash Considerations

Sonics Out:
Damien Wilkins
Kurt Thomas
'08 2nd Rounder (SEA)

Why for Seattle:
They have a million second rounders, this clears a lot of money should Wilkins decide NOT to opt out and it helps their cap space plan in 2009-2010 in the event that Wilkins doesn't opt out, Kurt Thomas is gone at the end of the year and the 1st allows them to package the Phoenix picks to move up, and they save a little money.

Pacers In:
Chris Mihm
'08 2nd Rounder (SEA)
'08 2nd Rounder (CHA)

Pacers Out:
Jeff Foster

Why for Pacers: One good pick, one pick that can be used to move up or in a package, and $$ saved.
incontrol__
Veteran
Posts: 2,719
And1: 12
Joined: Aug 22, 2006

 

Post#2 » by incontrol__ » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:18 am

The only problem i really see for the Lakers is that that's an extra 6 million in luxury tax that we'd have to pay.

Take out the Vujacic for Wilkins swap? That lowers it to about 4 million in extra luxury tax...

I'd love that (Jeff Foster and Kurt Thomas for Kwame, Mihm, 1st, 2nd).
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#3 » by FlawlessVictory » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:21 am

^^You're right on that one.

In addition, being over the cap disqualifies you for that three million dollar check they send to teams that are under the cap. I forget what it's called.

I, also, don't see Buss sacrificing 9 million dollars(or 7 for that matter with a Vujacic swap).
CableKC
RealGM
Posts: 25,698
And1: 12,791
Joined: Aug 20, 2003
Location: Conseco FieldHouse, the house that Reggie built

 

Post#4 » by CableKC » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:51 am

Foster is one of those players that mean more to us then to another team.

Saving 6 mil and getting 2 2nd round draft picks isn't enough for him.
- In 2024, you are not voting for a "Democrat" or "Republican". You are voting for the Party that will defend Democracy and protect the most vulnerable among us.

#THE_GOP_IS_DEAD
#IT_IS_THE_PARTY_OF_TRUMP_NOW
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by dockingsched » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:56 am

looks weak for the pacers.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Griever24
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 25, 2007

 

Post#6 » by Griever24 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:32 am

Well i sorta liked it but in the end lakers dont bite
User avatar
djthesonicsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,534
And1: 159
Joined: Aug 13, 2007
     

 

Post#7 » by djthesonicsfan » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:56 pm

U-Borat wrote:How about the done and dusted: Kwame/08 lotto protected pick for Thomas/08 2nd rounder?


I certainly think this is a realistic trade proposal.

For the Lakers, it shows K Bryant management support for winning now, Kurt Thomas' contract is expiring so there's no long term risk & it would actually lower their team salary about $1M. Bottom line, I haven't seen a trade that would net the Lakers a better big. Including signing CWebb to a free agent contract.

For the Sonics, the 1st for 2nd pick swap would move us up 5 - 10 spots in the draft order, it would conveniently open up playing time for R Swift assuming he's recovered by the deadline and frankly Kurt Thomas' has provided such excellent leadership to the young Sonics management almost owes it to Kurt Thomas to send him to a contender.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,297
And1: 25,460
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#8 » by hermes » Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:01 pm

incontrol__ wrote:The only problem i really see for the Lakers is that that's an extra 6 million in luxury tax that we'd have to pay.

Take out the Vujacic for Wilkins swap? That lowers it to about 4 million in extra luxury tax...

I'd love that (Jeff Foster and Kurt Thomas for Kwame, Mihm, 1st, 2nd).

ya take out sasha and wilkins and lakerss do it
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#9 » by FlawlessVictory » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:06 am

CableKC wrote:Foster is one of those players that mean more to us then to another team.

Saving 6 mil and getting 2 2nd round draft picks isn't enough for him.


What exactly is he worth to the Pacers?

The Sonics second rounder is going to be pretty high.
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#10 » by FlawlessVictory » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:44 am

'09 LAL pick switched for '08 2nd CHA pick (LAL has it from a previous deal).

Is CHA '08 2nd + SEA '08 2nd = to the low first rounder that IND fans want for Foster?
User avatar
TSC25
Veteran
Posts: 2,549
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: Indianapolis

 

Post#11 » by TSC25 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:54 am

I'd rather keep Foster,he brings heart to this team,even thou Obie doesnt play him as much as he should.
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#12 » by FlawlessVictory » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:57 am

TSC25 wrote:I'd rather keep Foster,he brings heart to this team,even thou Obie doesnt play him as much as he should.


Is he really in the long term plans? It would seem to me that he doesn't exactly fit the new system you guys are trying to employ.
User avatar
bballpacen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,255
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: DIENER>>>>>>>you
Contact:

 

Post#13 » by bballpacen » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:59 am

FlawlessVictory wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



What exactly is he worth to the Pacers?
I think that the consensus amongst Pacerfans, is that he is worth a mid first rounder, assuming he can be moved for an expiring....
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#14 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:03 am

bballpacen wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think that the consensus amongst Pacerfans, is that he is worth a mid first rounder, assuming he can be moved for an expiring....

I grant you a "Pacer Point" for being correct.
FlawlessVictory
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

 

Post#15 » by FlawlessVictory » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:05 am

bballpacen wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think that the consensus amongst Pacerfans, is that he is worth a mid first rounder, assuming he can be moved for an expiring....


Interesting... Alright, thanks.

I'm not sure he should be worth THAT much more Kurt Thomas, but yall did say he was worth more to you than others.

Return to Trades and Transactions