shrink wrote:SkyHook wrote:Woke up with this idea, might be horrible.
Pretty cool that you dream in five team trades!
Not fully formed and armored coming out of my forehead by any stretch.
Moderators: pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat
shrink wrote:SkyHook wrote:Woke up with this idea, might be horrible.
Pretty cool that you dream in five team trades!
jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..

jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

brackdan70 wrote:Stating the obvious perhaps but an AD trade is goi g to be really difficult.
1. Coming up with Salary ballast means you have to send out really good players (which may not fit the Mavs timeline)
2. Adding value in pick(s) gets a bit scary considering health risks.
3. Mavs are surely going to want a good young g player and at least one good pick.
All that said makes it really hard to see many realistic suitors.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:brackdan70 wrote:Stating the obvious perhaps but an AD trade is goi g to be really difficult.
1. Coming up with Salary ballast means you have to send out really good players (which may not fit the Mavs timeline)
2. Adding value in pick(s) gets a bit scary considering health risks.
3. Mavs are surely going to want a good young g player and at least one good pick.
All that said makes it really hard to see many realistic suitors.
#1 definitely isn't true. Plenty of teams, including many of the rumored suitors can match the money without giving up a single really good player. Salary matching is always an issue when talking about that much money and apron issues(and Dallas is inches from the 2nd), but Dallas would not have to take back some really good win now player at all. And in fact I wouldn't expect one in an offer. If you are adding AD you want to win right now, so you don't want to subtract one of your best players especially with AD's health meaning you need that player in the regular season.
#2 sure. I wouldn't expect any picks that look premium at all.
#3 Mavs should want to get as much as possible. But the two guys currently running the front office(and Cuban if he's really more involved again) definitely can read a market. The question would be do they want to move AD even at bargain prices or is it contingent on getting something of real quality back beyond financial flexibility.
There are definitely realistic suitors, but I think its possible only at bargain prices. But the salary matching concerns you allude to aren't significant for a number of teams where he makes sense and has already been linked to.
NYG wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..
There's not a lot... Jalen Green? RJ Barrett?
jayjaysee wrote:NYG wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..
There's not a lot... Jalen Green? RJ Barrett?
You suggesting Dallas adds a swap or an LAL pick to get either of those guys?
No problem with Phoenix/Toronto holding their guys, but yeah. If that’s the crop, I put this idea in the right thread. Those aren’t positive value players imo and you just keep going with Christie if those team want assets for them..
Godaddycurse wrote:jayjaysee wrote:NYG wrote:
There's not a lot... Jalen Green? RJ Barrett?
You suggesting Dallas adds a swap or an LAL pick to get either of those guys?
No problem with Phoenix/Toronto holding their guys, but yeah. If that’s the crop, I put this idea in the right thread. Those aren’t positive value players imo and you just keep going with Christie if those team want assets for them..
you can probably get derozan for cheap without those picks
jayjaysee wrote:NYG wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..
There's not a lot... Jalen Green? RJ Barrett?
You suggesting Dallas adds a swap or an LAL pick to get either of those guys?
No problem with Phoenix/Toronto holding their guys, but yeah. If that’s the crop, I put this idea in the right thread. Those aren’t positive value players imo and you just keep going with Christie if those team want assets for them..
NYG wrote:jayjaysee wrote:NYG wrote:
There's not a lot... Jalen Green? RJ Barrett?
You suggesting Dallas adds a swap or an LAL pick to get either of those guys?
No problem with Phoenix/Toronto holding their guys, but yeah. If that’s the crop, I put this idea in the right thread. Those aren’t positive value players imo and you just keep going with Christie if those team want assets for them..
Not suggesting they're worth that... just did a quick mental check of available SG's and there isn't a lot on the market... Zach LaVine?



Diop wrote:Dallas want green back?
Diop wrote:Dallas want green back?
jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:jayjaysee wrote:Since Dallas isn’t as bad as the tanking teams and Cooper Flagg actually looks better than I expected.. And AD’s value is so low that Dallas realistically might as well keep him, you can cover/ruin Cooper Flagg’s rookie contract by paying AD too much money through the pick debt..
Goal is to just try to win the play-in and be the team to get beat up by OKC or Joker…
What’s the best 2guard Dallas can get for a 2026 swap? Or the 2029 LAL first?
Has to be an upgrade over Christie? Contract doesn’t really matter since Dallas has so much meh money themselves..
Salary has to be Klay, Naji, Martin, Hardy.. Christie if it’s a worthwhile upgrade over Christie.. Lively if he’s actually valued (I assume he isn’t, so just keep him.) .. Gafford probably kept in this scenario with Lively out..
Klay to lakers
Holiday and Duop to Dallas
Naji, Martin/ lakers filler
4th team to talk Dalton
Not sure word Lakers pick but some seconds

LarsV8 wrote:Trying to think of things LAC could do, but there isn't much.
I don't think they can recover their picks, and I think the current core is just going to get worse with age.
What about swapping out distressed assets, but just getting younger.
Harden for Trae
- Don't think the Hawks know what to do with Trae, and Harden could help them in the short term, and could certainly help teach JJ some tricks, like he did with Maxey.
- For LAC, they can't really bottom out, so they have to just try something different and hope to find a spark.
Kawhi for Ja
- Ja in Memphis just seems over, and he looks horrific now. Kawhi is alteast effective when he plays.
- For LAC, same as above, they gamble on talent in the hopes of finding some magic with something different.
Return to Trades and Transactions