Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

Who won the trade

Chicago
60
34%
New York Knicks
28
16%
Both
20
11%
Neither
20
11%
I'm just too excited that Chuck has to eat crow on Rose's value
17
10%
There is no way Rose has this much value, what are you thinking Phil????
29
17%
 
Total votes: 174

User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,929
And1: 16,926
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc 

Post#121 » by GimmeDat » Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:42 am

I think the Bulls got solid value for Rose considering. Grant's a nice young player and Lopez is clearly a starting level big, on a good contract.

The question is though, as it is with any other Rose trade scenario, what was the point? Where does it get us? We didn't make the playoffs last season and we deduct Gasol, Noah and Rose from that.

Are the Bulls in a better position to compete post-trade? I don't think so. You could argue that Lopez is more productive than Rose, or more productive than Noah, at this stage of their careers, so that's a bonus, but my point is that with all the inevitable losses, plus the decline of guys like Gibson, it seems clear to me that the writing is on the wall for a full rebuild.

I'd be a big fan of the trade if we were trading Butler also, but it doesn't appear that that's the intention of the front office. So, as it stands right now, I'm pretty meh on the whole thing, and overall, s****y, given the emotional attachment of the trade.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,353
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc 

Post#122 » by verbal8 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:19 pm

GimmeDat wrote:I think the Bulls got solid value for Rose considering. Grant's a nice young player and Lopez is clearly a starting level big, on a good contract.

The question is though, as it is with any other Rose trade scenario, what was the point? Where does it get us? We didn't make the playoffs last season and we deduct Gasol, Noah and Rose from that.

Are the Bulls in a better position to compete post-trade? I don't think so. You could argue that Lopez is more productive than Rose, or more productive than Noah, at this stage of their careers, so that's a bonus, but my point is that with all the inevitable losses, plus the decline of guys like Gibson, it seems clear to me that the writing is on the wall for a full rebuild.

I'd be a big fan of the trade if we were trading Butler also, but it doesn't appear that that's the intention of the front office. So, as it stands right now, I'm pretty meh on the whole thing, and overall, s****y, given the emotional attachment of the trade.


I think this deal gives the Bulls the option to build around Butler. If they upgrade the back court, I think they can build a decent play-off team. While Calderon isn't great for a starting PG, I think he looks pretty good as a 3rd guard.
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,929
And1: 16,926
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc 

Post#123 » by GimmeDat » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:39 pm

verbal8 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:I think the Bulls got solid value for Rose considering. Grant's a nice young player and Lopez is clearly a starting level big, on a good contract.

The question is though, as it is with any other Rose trade scenario, what was the point? Where does it get us? We didn't make the playoffs last season and we deduct Gasol, Noah and Rose from that.

Are the Bulls in a better position to compete post-trade? I don't think so. You could argue that Lopez is more productive than Rose, or more productive than Noah, at this stage of their careers, so that's a bonus, but my point is that with all the inevitable losses, plus the decline of guys like Gibson, it seems clear to me that the writing is on the wall for a full rebuild.

I'd be a big fan of the trade if we were trading Butler also, but it doesn't appear that that's the intention of the front office. So, as it stands right now, I'm pretty meh on the whole thing, and overall, s****y, given the emotional attachment of the trade.


I think this deal gives the Bulls the option to build around Butler. If they upgrade the back court, I think they can build a decent play-off team. While Calderon isn't great for a starting PG, I think he looks pretty good as a 3rd guard.


They can definitely build an on-paper playoff team again, but then again, last seasons Bulls team was an on-paper 2nd-seed team, so I'm scared to do any assuming. Best case scenario, I think we get back on the treadmill. You can add pieces, but ultimately, there's no major assets to boost this teams ceiling.

Bulls fans are mentally exhausted. I can only speak for myself, but I'd rather cash in assets for Butler and co. and start from scratch than continue to try winning without all of the 'old guard'.

As for Calderon, by the sounds of Knick fans, he's completely washed up by this point.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc 

Post#124 » by bondom34 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:44 pm

GimmeDat wrote:
verbal8 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:I think the Bulls got solid value for Rose considering. Grant's a nice young player and Lopez is clearly a starting level big, on a good contract.

The question is though, as it is with any other Rose trade scenario, what was the point? Where does it get us? We didn't make the playoffs last season and we deduct Gasol, Noah and Rose from that.

Are the Bulls in a better position to compete post-trade? I don't think so. You could argue that Lopez is more productive than Rose, or more productive than Noah, at this stage of their careers, so that's a bonus, but my point is that with all the inevitable losses, plus the decline of guys like Gibson, it seems clear to me that the writing is on the wall for a full rebuild.

I'd be a big fan of the trade if we were trading Butler also, but it doesn't appear that that's the intention of the front office. So, as it stands right now, I'm pretty meh on the whole thing, and overall, s****y, given the emotional attachment of the trade.


I think this deal gives the Bulls the option to build around Butler. If they upgrade the back court, I think they can build a decent play-off team. While Calderon isn't great for a starting PG, I think he looks pretty good as a 3rd guard.


They can definitely build an on-paper playoff team again, but then again, last seasons Bulls team was an on-paper 2nd-seed team, so I'm scared to do any assuming. Best case scenario, I think we get back on the treadmill. You can add pieces, but ultimately, there's no major assets to boost this teams ceiling.

Bulls fans are mentally exhausted. I can only speak for myself, but I'd rather cash in assets for Butler and co. and start from scratch than continue to try winning without all of the 'old guard'.

As for Calderon, by the sounds of Knick fans, he's completely washed up by this point.

Honestly, Rose pretty much seems to be too. They got a solid center and a recent first round pick for a guy who was pretty awful and leaving anyway. This was a steal for Chicago to me.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: Official: Knicks/Bulls: D Rose Traded/Lope Grant Calderon etc 

Post#125 » by Knickfan1982 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 8:46 pm

bondom34 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/KCJHoop/status/745696405860270081[/tweet]

Merging into here everyone's threads



So part of the benefits for this deal was supposed to be freeing up long term salary. Salary space we just wasted by spending more money than Lopez would have cost to sign his replacement. A replacement coming off of a bad year no less. :noway:

Knicks are going to Knick.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.

Return to Trades and Transactions