Telfaire wrote:My new prediction:
Simmons to Sacramento
FVV & Hield to Philly
Mitchell, Maxey & Bagley to Raps
That’s just not enough for Philly to move Simmons.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
Telfaire wrote:My new prediction:
Simmons to Sacramento
FVV & Hield to Philly
Mitchell, Maxey & Bagley to Raps
the_process wrote:Telfaire wrote:My new prediction:
Simmons to Sacramento
FVV & Hield to Philly
Mitchell, Maxey & Bagley to Raps
That’s just not enough for Philly to move Simmons.
Saberestar wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Saberestar wrote:The Sixers are in a win-now Mode and Buddy Hield is probably the best player that they can get in any trade...so I would say the Kings.
Buddy Hield, Marvin Bagley and a lottery protected FRP for Ben Simmons. No Maxey involved.
If Maxey is added to the trade the Kings would need to send another FRP to the Sixers.
What kind of winning have Hield accomplished in his career..?
Hield is a great scorer and in his prime. Bagley is a good young player with untapped potential. Add a pick and I think that is a solid package for Simmons at his salary.
Pelon chingon wrote:KAT for Simmons straight up.
Philly adds talent and goes twin towers plus KAT likes to play from outside anyways.
Minnesota enters a new era building around Edwards and Simmons making defense a priority. They can also trade DLO later.
the_process wrote:Saberestar wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
What kind of winning have Hield accomplished in his career..?
Hield is a great scorer and in his prime. Bagley is a good young player with untapped potential. Add a pick and I think that is a solid package for Simmons at his salary.
Bagley is a bust. Hield is negative value. Simmons is definitely not negative value, even now.
If you want to send just those two for Ben, IMO it’s 3 1sts (two unprotected, one lotto protected) and 2 swaps.
If Sacto wants to add Ben cheaply as possible? A good way to start is to add value by offering a Barnes-Tobias swap. Build out from there.
HotelVitale wrote:the_process wrote:Telfaire wrote:My new prediction:
Simmons to Sacramento
FVV & Hield to Philly
Mitchell, Maxey & Bagley to Raps
That’s just not enough for Philly to move Simmons.
They’re also giving up maxey here, in exchange for Hield I guess? That’s a pretty rough one to swallow.
BlazersBroncos wrote:I dont think Hield is negative value for PHI. He would be a great fit at SG.
Getting FVV and Buddy for Simmons would be a good move. FVV has already shown enough to be a #3 on a championship team and Hield as a #4 is tremendous. The thing is, does FVV bring enough shot creation to be 'the man' in crunch time? I dont think so. And I think thats what PHI needs in any Ben Simmons deal.
Roy The Natural wrote:Sportfan73 wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:
This sort of implies bringing Simmons to Portland to play with Lillard. I'm good with the idea, but 76ers fans don't seem to like anything that Portland has outside of Dame. At this point, I'm also not sure that Morey would trade Simmons to Portland without getting Lillard back. Feels like too much egg on his face to settle for CJ McCollum+stuff.
I was implying the same. At some point maybe morey decides he likes his young guys enough that it’s more worth it to get Cj+++ and keep them then to MAYBE at best get Dame if he’s available
Yea. It's hard to sift through the bullcrap of reports and fan lowball offers. But I do think that McCollum+RoCo+picks should be more appealing to the 76ers than the Beasley+stuff+picks or Hield+stuff+picks offers I'm seeing in this thread. However, Fox should probably be 1a for the 76ers. That just doesn't seem like it's on the table though. I don't think a Portland offer built around CJ+RoCo is "bad"... I think it makes the 76ers better and probably makes Portland better as well... However, It's hard to see Morey accepting it after all the Lillard talk. Though I don't think a Lillard trade built around Simmons and stuff was ever really potentially on the table.
It is interesting though that when I go into the 76ers forums there's a bunch of members there who just can't for the life of them escape "the process" mindset. The amount of posters who want SUPER YOUNG picks and prospects for Simmons baffles me. The 76ers just extended Embiid.... trying to rebuild again is a recipe for utter disaster. There's a lot of dubious analysis going on about trading Simmons for a package that can be used to acquire Lillard later, but if you trade Simmons to GSW for example and Kaminga sucks all season... and Wiseman doesn't take a step forward... you're stuck with an utter disaster, a bunch of assets that massively depreciated and are even further from getting an all-star level player that fits better to replace Simmons.
kuclas wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:Sportfan73 wrote:I was implying the same. At some point maybe morey decides he likes his young guys enough that it’s more worth it to get Cj+++ and keep them then to MAYBE at best get Dame if he’s available
Yea. It's hard to sift through the bullcrap of reports and fan lowball offers. But I do think that McCollum+RoCo+picks should be more appealing to the 76ers than the Beasley+stuff+picks or Hield+stuff+picks offers I'm seeing in this thread. However, Fox should probably be 1a for the 76ers. That just doesn't seem like it's on the table though. I don't think a Portland offer built around CJ+RoCo is "bad"... I think it makes the 76ers better and probably makes Portland better as well... However, It's hard to see Morey accepting it after all the Lillard talk. Though I don't think a Lillard trade built around Simmons and stuff was ever really potentially on the table.
It is interesting though that when I go into the 76ers forums there's a bunch of members there who just can't for the life of them escape "the process" mindset. The amount of posters who want SUPER YOUNG picks and prospects for Simmons baffles me. The 76ers just extended Embiid.... trying to rebuild again is a recipe for utter disaster. There's a lot of dubious analysis going on about trading Simmons for a package that can be used to acquire Lillard later, but if you trade Simmons to GSW for example and Kaminga sucks all season... and Wiseman doesn't take a step forward... you're stuck with an utter disaster, a bunch of assets that massively depreciated and are even further from getting an all-star level player that fits better to replace Simmons.
That's the same as you portland fans want. Picks plus propsects. Every teams wants that.
Simmons is a better player than CJ (at least for regular season). He's younger.
CJ is not a true point guard. Sixers need that.
Agree that trying to do a two part trade with Simmons for assets (than trying to move those asset later is utter non sense)
Sixers don't want to rebuild so not interested in picks in the future.
CJ plus Covington is meh. Covington is a very frustrating player. He does some nice things than makes bone headed plays. He's been doing that his entire career.
BlazersBroncos wrote:I would bet my last dollar that the Ben Simmons return isnt better than CJ + Covington.
Roy The Natural wrote:Village Idiot wrote:Can Portland even trade a pick? The pick in the Nance trade was lottery protected until 2028 after which it turns into a 2nd, if I recall correctly
True. I guess I thought it was protected for only 2 years. However, I'd argue that considering the protection never lightens, it's likely that Chicago would agree to a lifting of the protection, and that was discussed prior to the trade if Portland finds a deal they like.
Return to Trades and Transactions