Thoughts in General, Rumors, etc 3.0

Quite a bit of filler involved if getting both Westbrook and buddy

EDIT: Moving off Westbrook and not giving up picks would be pretty solid for Washington since I think the salary they'll take back won't be too terrible

Post #1267 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:16 pm

VCfor3 wrote:Quite a bit of filler involved if getting both Westbrook and buddy

They're going to have to sign and trade Schroder in one of those deals, right?

Post #1268 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:16 pm

kalenclayton wrote:Yoooooo

Read on Twitter
?s=21

Wooooooooooo

Post #1269 » by **bondom34** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:16 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Post #1270 » by **VCfor3** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:17 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
VCfor3 wrote:Quite a bit of filler involved if getting both Westbrook and buddy

They're going to have to sign and trade Schroder in one of those deals, right?

Surely. Shams just said Kuzma and Harrell would be involved so only one of Buddy or Westbrook will be gotten that way. The other yeah S&Ts or something will have to happen.

Post #1271 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:17 pm

This is something.

Post #1272 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:20 pm

That would be great for Washington given where they were with Wall a year ago. I mean, any way Beal stays if they move Russ?

Post #1273 » by **MadNESS** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:22 pm

WB / Hied / Bron / AD????

Man I love the off-seasons

Post #1274 » by **zimpy27** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:22 pm

bondom34 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=19

So is Woj or Shams wrong here?

Looks like Lakers have played one of them.

Post #1275 » by **zimpy27** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:23 pm

MadNESS wrote:WB / Hied / Bron / AD????

Man I love the off-seasons

Woj have Kuz and Harrell for Hield

Shams has Kuz, Harrell, KCP for Westbrook

Both can't be right.

Post #1276 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:23 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=19

So is Woj or Shams wrong here?

Looks like Lakers have played one of them.

I think when Trez opted in Woj ran with what we've all been discussing re the obviousness of the Hield trade. Shams info seems much more solid/timely to me. Lakers may also have multiple irons in the fire and might try to do both a different way.

Post #1277 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:24 pm

Shams appears to be winning. Nice work getting the Shamet deal tho, Woj...

Post #1278 » by **bondom34** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:24 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=19

So is Woj or Shams wrong here?

Looks like Lakers have played one of them.

I just get some humor we have Shams/Woj reporting the same trade package for 2 different players right now (well overlapping at least).

Post #1279 » by **VCfor3** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:24 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
MadNESS wrote:WB / Hied / Bron / AD????

Man I love the off-seasons

Woj have Kuz and Harrell for Hield

Shams has Kuz, Harrell, KCP for Westbrook

Both can't be right.

We placing bets on which gets done?

Westbrook feels like the target, but I always back my man Woj so I'll say Hield is ultimately the play.

Post #1280 » by **zimpy27** » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:25 pm

VCfor3 wrote:
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
VCfor3 wrote:Quite a bit of filler involved if getting both Westbrook and buddy

They're going to have to sign and trade Schroder in one of those deals, right?

Surely. Shams just said Kuzma and Harrell would be involved so only one of Buddy or Westbrook will be gotten that way. The other yeah S&Ts or something will have to happen.

Schroeder SnT makes sense for Westbrook. They can't talk about it yet because tampering but Washington have no other PG if Westbrook goes.

I'm expecting that deal will be Schroeder(SnT) + KCP + future Lakers first for Westbrook