DroseReturnChi wrote:beb0p wrote:No from Sacramento. Haliburton is not on the table.
The thing is, I don't think the Kings want Simmons that badly - he'd be an odd fit on the Kings and the GM's crushes are guys who can shoot.
Would the Kings be happy to have Simmons for pennies on the dollar? Sure. But they're not going all out on a mission of Simmons-or-bust. Which is a long winded way of saying I highly doubt he will end up in Sacramento.
.
simmons is a better fit than either hali/fox because he fixes kings biggest weakness which is defense. thats why im saying they should not be cheap and trade dollar for a dollar. the chances of hali/fox/mitchell working out in 5 yrs is close to 0 a good gm would be prepared for the inevitable because otherwise they might be the ones similar to simmons/embiid issue.
i said yrs ago sixers have to trade embiid for simmons to be a all nba player and this is what happens if they dont listen and only care abt talent. fit does matter in the end especially if you want to win a title. nba is all about usage i knew simmons would be marginalized to death after joel was going for that mvp. simmons fit only with a few team with winners like golden state because steph/klay are the few stars that likes to play better off ball.
Moving Hield and Bagley will automatically fix the Kings' defense. If you want to improve their defense even more, there are more economical ways to go about it than to pay a premium for Simmons. Defensive players traditionally do not commands the price that Morey is asking for. It's offense that cost a premium, and Morey is pricing Simmons on the level of an offensive jaggernaut. If the Kings (or any team) pay Morey's price for Simmons based on defense, then right away they've already lost the trade.
Unless the player is a C, he needs to be able to shoot in order to play for the Kings. They already have two ball handlers (potentially three with Davion playing alongside Fox and Haliburton), so a ballhandler is the last thing they need more of. Simmons is not a good fit on the Kings. You can argue he's so talented that it doesn't matter, but I'd argue that he's so unique that the fit matters for him more than many star level players. The Kings need a wing who can shoot. Simmons is not that guy. There is no reason to force a round peg into a square hole.
I don't know what you mean by Hali/Fox/Mitchell working out in 5 years. No one on the Kings is expecting Hali/Fox/Mitchell to be the big three. Haliburton should at best be the #3 guy and preferably the #4. Mitchell is clue guy. They are hunting for one or two players who can carry the offensive load for Fox and also defend at a high level. Maybe they find that guy, maybe the don't. The last they should do is to settle for someone who only somewhat fill that role and paying a premium for it.
.