Cklbmk wrote:
Meant double counted in the sense that he had 2 cap holds, one for minimum one for his other
Got it! Yeah that was a goof. Great catch by both of you. Thanks again!
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
Cklbmk wrote:
Meant double counted in the sense that he had 2 cap holds, one for minimum one for his other
JustinSane wrote:Somehow, my math is coming out a bit different. I'm getting 13,746,817 in real cap space.
JustinSane wrote:Thanks for the clarification. Why are we assuming that every team with meaningful cap space wouldn't renounce the exceptions though? The exceptions are less useful than raw cap space, so hanging on to them makes no sense. Is there any scenario when a team with more raw cap space than the total of their exceptions is better of keeping the exceptions rather than renouncing them?
Smitty731 wrote:JustinSane wrote:Thanks for the clarification. Why are we assuming that every team with meaningful cap space wouldn't renounce the exceptions though? The exceptions are less useful than raw cap space, so hanging on to them makes no sense. Is there any scenario when a team with more raw cap space than the total of their exceptions is better of keeping the exceptions rather than renouncing them?
That is valid point. In the Maximum Cap Space #s I provided, that includes all exceptions renounced, as well as all draft rights, FAs, all non-guaranteed deals waived, and all options not picked up. Not overly realistic, since not all of that would like play out, but I wanted to give the picture anyway.
JustinSane wrote:
Reading through the link you sent (thanks again for that), in the answer to question #26 it lists only the tax-payer and non-tax payer mid-level exemptions as creating a cap hold - the room mid level exemption is not listed. And given that the room mid level exemption would be wholly pointless if it was simply a more restricted version of cap space, it makes sense that the room mid level exemption can be used after the cap space has been filed up. Question #25 also also lists the BAE as being lost along with the taxpayer or non-taxpayer MLE if at team has, at any point, cap space exceeding the sum of the BAE, taxpayer or non-taxpayer MLE and any trade exemption.
The way I read it, if a team's cap space ever exceeds the total of their exemptions, they permanently lose that year's exemptions (trade exemption, BAE and tax or non-tax payer MLE) but gain the room mid level exemption, which can be used after they fill up their tax space. This makes sense, since otherwise the room MLE wouldn't have any purpose at all. Its intent seems to be to let teams with cap space spend up to the salary cap and then add a cheap player or two on a short (no longer than 2 year) contract to fill out the roster.
Smitty731 wrote:Updated OP on 7/3 to reflect signings of Cartier Martin and Jodie Meeks.
Laimbeer wrote:Smitty731 wrote:Updated OP on 7/3 to reflect signings of Cartier Martin and Jodie Meeks.
Smitty731 wrote:Updated OP on 7/8 to reflect signing of Aaron Gray.
Laimbeer wrote:Smitty731 wrote:Updated OP on 7/8 to reflect signing of Aaron Gray.
What did you count for his salary?
Return to Trades and Transactions