KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,317
And1: 20,911
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#21 » by HartfordWhalers » Tue Sep 6, 2016 1:11 pm

Fotis St wrote:Count again.... My vote is the 5th NO ... basketballwacko 4th No, mine 5th no... You made a mistake with basketballwacko count...


I honestly don't think I could have been more explicit in asking him what his vote is and if it was a formal no vote in this thread. Not really sure anything was unclear...


HartfordWhalers wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Charlotte gets cut out of this trade pretty quickly. I'm a no.


1 No.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'll give this a KOTB: yes


1 Yes, 1 No.

patman52 wrote:I think this works. Yes.


2 Yes, 1 No.

RipPizzaGuy wrote:I'll give this a no.


2 Yes, 2 No.

winter_mute_13 wrote:for KOTB purposes, I guess it's close enough. KOTB yes


3 Yes, 2 No.

pacers33granger wrote:Forgot about the KOTB part. I'd have to say no from Sacramento's perspective.


3 yes, 3 No.

kalenclayton wrote:As for the trade, I believe this is great for all parties. KOTB: yes


4 Yes, 3 No.

basketballwacko2 wrote:Find a 4th team to take Lamb and I'm ok with it, although I think Monta is gonna have a very nice season for the Pacers. No way Bird does this because he's committed to Monta for at least one more full season.

I'll trim it down to this...


Is this a formal KOTB no?

4 Yes, 3 or 4 No.

Fotis St wrote:Really good trade proposal.

KOTB vote No from Charlotte.


That either makes it 4/4 and next vote decides, or kills it after calling it a great trade. :) :(
Fotis St
General Manager
Posts: 9,447
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 05, 2015

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#22 » by Fotis St » Tue Sep 6, 2016 1:27 pm

Basketballwacko vote? No way Bird does this.... And he explained why....

On the other hand patman52 vote is not explained. "I think it works" yes ... Think is not believe.... Not explained anything...

Bullyking's last vote yes ... Is not explained at all too. Not one sentence as the rules are.

Either way ... Point or not ... well done or nice try, but my honest opinion was posted and explained, I believe it never happens, Charlotte stuck on Stuckey.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,249
And1: 97,971
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#23 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Sep 6, 2016 2:05 pm

basketballwacko2 wrote:Words


Trying to confirm your vote here. We think it is a no, but it decides the point here so we want to be clear.

Thanks

Chuck
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,337
And1: 5,038
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#24 » by Wizop » Tue Sep 6, 2016 2:26 pm

This Pacer fan says no. I like Hawes and think he'd fit nicely but so would Landry who we could have while giving up nothing. the big problem though is you have us trading a starting shooting guard for two backups. They may be good backups but neither is ready to start on a playoff contender. we'd move Stuckey and Lavoy Allen for an experienced starting 3 and D shooting guard, but I don't think Bird wants to move Ellis for a prospect.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 21,997
And1: 4,323
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#25 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Sep 7, 2016 12:12 am

HartfordWhalers wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:...


See above for clarification on if you are voting KOTB no. Thanks!


I'm gonna have to vote no.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 21,997
And1: 4,323
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: KOTB: Indy/Sac/Charlotte 

Post#26 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Sep 7, 2016 1:12 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:...


See above for clarification on if you are voting KOTB no. Thanks!


I'm gonna have to vote no.


It's not far off I'm just not fond of Lamb, he could prove me wrong. I'd just like to give Monta a season where he's fully healthy to see how he plays. I was banged up a lot last season as was Stuckey. But I would trade stuckey if we could get a better shooter.

Return to Trades and Transactions