drosereturn wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:HotelVitale wrote:Yeah but Lou Will is also going to be 34 next week and might start taking his tumble any moment now. Sato is in full prime and he'll be rock solid for the next 3-4 years at worst. It matters here.
Nah, pretty sure you want the player who plays a define role well rather than the one who is only possibly a NBA rotation player.
Even if you have Dunn as good as Sato, I have the fit quite awful. It is like adding a worse offensively Beverly.
Dunn is like a poor man's Smart and LAC probably needs both of them to replace Bev and Lou.
But the problem is Chicago doesnt need troublemakers and need bluechip prospects/picks to give up all defensive 1st type in Dunn (number2 in dbpm, steals) and a swiss army knife thats paid bargain in Sato they dont even cost 20 combined a yr.
Basically, Chicago has all these coveted prime bench players that can play in the finals 20mins but most of them dont even have their own firsts every trade scenario has been tough to the point Chicago will just keep them rather than help Lebron another ring.
Chicago has all these coveted prime bench players that can play in the final
Some think that LaVine will eventualy be able to establish himself as a #2 option on a contemder while others have lower expectations for him.
If Chicago is unable to identify, garner and establish good #1 & #2 options, then having a quality bench really doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things.
The balanced ensemble approach for a roster works from time to time, but top teams usually get to the top because they have one or more superior players.