
Raptors/Wolves and its big
Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,205
- And1: 14,098
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Also am i the only one amused by how this is almost parallel (well opposite direction) to the Love for wiggins/bennett (1st overall, recent high pick who did poorly) trade back in the days? 

Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,353
- And1: 19,382
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Godaddycurse wrote:Wolveswin wrote:This one has been batted around on Wolves board and gets mixed reviews. I for one would do it.
I think Raptors might want a consolidation 3rd team involved. Say #17 + #29 + Culver (unless they really like his upside) + Okogie (or other Wolves youth) for best draft pick or other teams youth they can get.
How about this crazy idea:
Warriors: Paschall + 2021 Wolves 1st FOR Johnson (via Iggy TPE) + OG
Do Warriors need to give up more? Add 2022 1st?
Raptors: Siakam + OG + #29 FOR #1 + Culver + Paschall + #17 + 2021 Wolves 1st (Wolves make unprotected)
Wolves: #1 + Johnson + Culver + #17 + 2021 1st (now unprotected) FOR Siakam + #29
There is a disconnect between wolves fans and rest of nba where they think the #1 is super valuable except rest of us think this draft is not enticing and full of risk at the top, so its not assigned the same value it normally has. i mean if you ask yourself is KAT is worth your package it would be a pretty resounding no from your part as well (understanbably). Imo toronto values siakam as much as minny values KAT.
But to be fair, in a draft where KAT WAS the #1 pick, there is no way they’d offer rookie KAT for Siakim.
I don’t think any wolves fan is treating the value of the #1 as it would be in a normal draft. You aren’t seeing it valued like it’s Kyrie, Zion or KAT.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,353
- And1: 19,382
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
As mentioned earlier, a deal like this has been discussed in the Wolves board, and I admit I was a fan. It’s tough for any team to add a third max deal, but I think Siakim is a guy who fits.
I will note, that since I am in love with the Raptor organization, I have an odd worry. First, it’s amazing they way they have maneuvered between winning a championship, losing Kawhi, and still having the flexibility to turn their organization around and go in whatever direction they choose. Part of this strength has come from Ujiri and Nick Nurse drastically developing guys like Norm Powell, FVV, Anunoby, and Siakim, to be worth far more than most would have imagined. They do so by creating systems that let players do what they do well, and slowly enhancing the role. Raptors-Siakim is well worth this price, especially to a franchise that isn’t a free agent destination for good players, let alone Giannis. However, would the Wolves get Raptors-Siakim, or would Wolves-Siakim be worse, and they’d get to watch the Raptors talented organization turn Culver and Wiseman(?) into stars? Siakim looked very mortal in the playoffs.
Regardless, I’d make that gamble in MIN.
I will note, that since I am in love with the Raptor organization, I have an odd worry. First, it’s amazing they way they have maneuvered between winning a championship, losing Kawhi, and still having the flexibility to turn their organization around and go in whatever direction they choose. Part of this strength has come from Ujiri and Nick Nurse drastically developing guys like Norm Powell, FVV, Anunoby, and Siakim, to be worth far more than most would have imagined. They do so by creating systems that let players do what they do well, and slowly enhancing the role. Raptors-Siakim is well worth this price, especially to a franchise that isn’t a free agent destination for good players, let alone Giannis. However, would the Wolves get Raptors-Siakim, or would Wolves-Siakim be worse, and they’d get to watch the Raptors talented organization turn Culver and Wiseman(?) into stars? Siakim looked very mortal in the playoffs.
Regardless, I’d make that gamble in MIN.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,110
- And1: 36,153
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
I like it for both teams, but I suspect that so long as the Raptors retain some hope of signing Giannis, they're going to keep Siakam.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,205
- And1: 14,098
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
shrink wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Wolveswin wrote:This one has been batted around on Wolves board and gets mixed reviews. I for one would do it.
I think Raptors might want a consolidation 3rd team involved. Say #17 + #29 + Culver (unless they really like his upside) + Okogie (or other Wolves youth) for best draft pick or other teams youth they can get.
How about this crazy idea:
Warriors: Paschall + 2021 Wolves 1st FOR Johnson (via Iggy TPE) + OG
Do Warriors need to give up more? Add 2022 1st?
Raptors: Siakam + OG + #29 FOR #1 + Culver + Paschall + #17 + 2021 Wolves 1st (Wolves make unprotected)
Wolves: #1 + Johnson + Culver + #17 + 2021 1st (now unprotected) FOR Siakam + #29
There is a disconnect between wolves fans and rest of nba where they think the #1 is super valuable except rest of us think this draft is not enticing and full of risk at the top, so its not assigned the same value it normally has. i mean if you ask yourself is KAT is worth your package it would be a pretty resounding no from your part as well (understanbably). Imo toronto values siakam as much as minny values KAT.
But to be fair, in a draft where KAT WAS the #1 pick, there is no way they’d offer rookie KAT for Siakim.
I don’t think any wolves fan is treating the value of the #1 as it would be in a normal draft. You aren’t seeing it valued like it’s Kyrie, Zion or KAT.
There were talks at various points of the year where it was actually arguable if siakam or simmons was the better player/more valuable. Then covid and bubble playoffs happened and siakam's play fell off a cliff.. I would put my money on him coming back strong rather than raptors selling low on him. Just like how philly wont trade simmons for minny package (which if i recall correctly had future 1sts as well) i doubt toronto would trade siakam for it either.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,444
- And1: 2,861
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Buzzard wrote:I don't think the Raptors do it even though it would help them keep FVV. I think they value Siakam in the two top five picks range. Culver has bust written all over him.
FUNNY I dont see u saying the same about Hunter.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
If the rumors are true that Minny wants to move the pick....
Then the Wolves take this for sure.
Then the Wolves take this for sure.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,205
- And1: 14,098
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
shrink wrote:As mentioned earlier, a deal like this has been discussed in the Wolves board, and I admit I was a fan. It’s tough for any team to add a third max deal, but I think Siakim is a guy who fits.
I will note, that since I am in love with the Raptor organization, I have an odd worry. First, it’s amazing they way they have maneuvered between winning a championship, losing Kawhi, and still having the flexibility to turn their organization around and go in whatever direction they choose. Part of this strength has come from Ujiri and Nick Nurse drastically developing guys like Norm Powell, Anunoby, and Siakim, to be worth far more than most would have imagined. They do so by creating systems that let players do what they do well, and slowly enhancing the role. Raptors-Siakim is well worth this price, especially to a franchise that isn’t a free agent destination for good players, let alone Giannis. However, would the Wolves get Raptors-Siakim, or would Wolves-Siakim be worse, and they’d get to watch the Raptors talented organization turn Culver and Wiseman(?) into stars? Siakim looked very mortal in the playoffs.
Regardless, I’d make that gamble in MIN.
Imo the risk for Siakam is rather low; his work ethics and love for the game is real and he seems like a humble guy too. This playoffs will make him work even harder and i expect a full bounce back with hopefully better efficiency next year. A good system is not going to propel just anyone from g league player to 2nd team all nba

Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,627
- And1: 99,021
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Neeva wrote:Buzzard wrote:I don't think the Raptors do it even though it would help them keep FVV. I think they value Siakam in the two top five picks range. Culver has bust written all over him.
FUNNY I dont see u saying the same about Hunter.
I'm failing to see any relevance of Hunter to his opinion of Siakam or Culver.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,205
- And1: 14,098
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Texas Chuck wrote:Neeva wrote:Buzzard wrote:I don't think the Raptors do it even though it would help them keep FVV. I think they value Siakam in the two top five picks range. Culver has bust written all over him.
FUNNY I dont see u saying the same about Hunter.
I'm failing to see any relevance of Hunter to his opinion of Siakam or Culver.
i think he means why isn't hunter seen as a bust since he also underperformed last year
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,627
- And1: 99,021
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Godaddycurse wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Neeva wrote:
FUNNY I dont see u saying the same about Hunter.
I'm failing to see any relevance of Hunter to his opinion of Siakam or Culver.
i think he means why isn't hunter seen as a bust since he also underperformed last year
I think he picked a player from a specific team for a reason that isn't particularly productive.

ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,853
- And1: 7,524
- Joined: May 16, 2018
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Neeva wrote:Buzzard wrote:I don't think the Raptors do it even though it would help them keep FVV. I think they value Siakam in the two top five picks range. Culver has bust written all over him.
FUNNY I dont see u saying the same about Hunter.
I may have gone a little overboard but I am being honest when I say wings ( anyone but especially shooters ) who can't shoot free throws scare me to death. I used per 36 numbers since Culver only played 23.9 minutes a game.
Shooting splits
Culver:
.404/.299/.462/.467 TS%
Hunter:
.410/.355/.764/.521 TS%
Per 36
Culver:
13.9 PTS/5.1 TRB/2.6 AST /13.6 FGA/1.9 FTA
Hunter:
13.9 PTS/5.1 TRB/2.0 AST/12.2 FGA/2.6 FTA
BAF Pacers: Unleash Trae!
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,923
- And1: 72,348
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
Ultimately this is Wiseman (who the Raptors would draft) for Siakam.
It's a really interesting proposition tbh. I'm not sure.
I'm not high on Culver (yes i've seen a bunch of him), Johnson is known commodity, Layman has surprising ups but meh on his shot.
#17 is also intriguing especially with Masai's ability or the ability to team with the 29 or Powell.
It's a really interesting proposition tbh. I'm not sure.
I'm not high on Culver (yes i've seen a bunch of him), Johnson is known commodity, Layman has surprising ups but meh on his shot.
#17 is also intriguing especially with Masai's ability or the ability to team with the 29 or Powell.
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,256
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 15, 2020
Re: Raptors/Wolves and its big
The Raptors wouldn't do this in this draft. The chances Edwards is better than Siakam is incredibly low. I prefer keeping Siakam and moving Powell to find a prospect in the late lotto.
Return to Trades and Transactions