[Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Who won the trade?

The team getting the pick for just cash!
8
57%
The team getting 2m for a pick that is almost guaranteed to never matter!
3
21%
Both!!
2
14%
Neither??
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14

User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,261
And1: 20,648
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#21 » by Diop » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:55 pm

this thread sucked me in and that annoys me :lol:
Image
User avatar
CallMeKahn
Veteran
Posts: 2,570
And1: 1,918
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#22 » by CallMeKahn » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:04 pm

How much help does Embiid need?
daoneandonly wrote:Utah doesnt have anyhting close value wise to get Dallas to even pick up the phone


Said in reference to Utah's trade assets in a potential Doncic deal.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,850
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#23 » by Colbinii » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:06 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be


Don't they have Reed?
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,339
And1: 2,023
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#24 » by Wilfried » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:06 pm

Colbinii wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be


Don't they have Reed?


Reed is a wing
cjmcallist
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,838
And1: 869
Joined: Jul 27, 2018
 

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m 

Post#25 » by cjmcallist » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:07 pm

I was thirsty for a trade. This didn't satisfy...
Alonzo_Morning
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 5,624
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
Location: Perth, Western Australia
 

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#26 » by Alonzo_Morning » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:08 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Philly paid $2M per Shams


Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?

More likely is used to move up.

#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.

Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?


The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend, does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?

So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,277
And1: 98,031
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#27 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:10 pm

Alonzo_Morning wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Philly paid $2M per Shams


Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?

More likely is used to move up.

#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.

Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?


The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?

So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?


The league sets a cap every year on how much cash you can send or receive in trades. Otherwise rich teams would just buy up talent from poorer teams. It's a competitive balance issue.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Alonzo_Morning
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 5,624
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
Location: Perth, Western Australia
 

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#28 » by Alonzo_Morning » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:10 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Alonzo_Morning wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?

More likely is used to move up.

#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.

Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?


The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?

So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?


The league sets a cap every year on how much cash you can send or receive in trades. Otherwise rich teams would just buy up talent from poorer teams. It's a competitive balance issue.


Gotcha, thanks
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,850
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade 

Post#29 » by Colbinii » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:22 pm

Wilfried wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be


Don't they have Reed?


Reed is a wing


A wing who cant pass or shoot?
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,916
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m 

Post#30 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:23 pm

I don’t have Reed as a wing.
Resistance
General Manager
Posts: 9,848
And1: 3,364
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m 

Post#31 » by Resistance » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:26 pm

98. Can cash be included as part of a trade package?


Players can be traded for cash, and cash can be included in trade packages. The amount of cash a team can pay or receive per season is limited to the "Maximum Annual Cash Limit," which is $5.1 million in 2017-18, with the amount in each subsequent season determined by applying the percentage change in the salary cap to the previous amount. For example, if the salary cap increases by 4% from 2017-18 to 2018-19, then the Maximum Annual Cash Limit will increase by 4% from 2017-18 to 2018-19.

Season.......Amount
2017-18....$5.100 million
2018-19....$5.243 million
2019-20....$5.617 million

There are two separate limits, one for the cash a team pays as part of trades each season, and the other for the cash a team receives as part of trades each season. For example, in 2017-18 a team may pay up to an aggregate $5.1 million in all trades it makes during the season, and it may receive up to an aggregate $5.1 million in all trades it makes during the season.

The cash applies to the current season's limit even if it changes hands in a future season. For example, suppose a team trades a draft pick that is top-20 protected this season, top-10 protected next season, and converts to $1 million cash if a pick is not conveyed by next season. $1 million is applied to the team's Maximum Annual Cash Limit for the current season.

Cash is NOT considered when matching salaries under the Traded Player exception. For example, a taxpaying team cannot add $3 million cash to a trade of their $5 million player in order to acquire a $10 million player.

In a sign-and-trade arrangement, if the contract contains a signing bonus, then any amount of this bonus paid by the signing team counts toward the team's Maximum Annual Cash Limit (see question number 92).

Return to Trades and Transactions