
[Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
- Diop
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 40,261
- And1: 20,648
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: Diop Dead Ugly
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
- CallMeKahn
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,570
- And1: 1,918
- Joined: Feb 17, 2013
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
How much help does Embiid need?
daoneandonly wrote:Utah doesnt have anyhting close value wise to get Dallas to even pick up the phone
Said in reference to Utah's trade assets in a potential Doncic deal.
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,850
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be
Don't they have Reed?
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,339
- And1: 2,023
- Joined: May 24, 2007
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
Colbinii wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be
Don't they have Reed?
Reed is a wing
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,838
- And1: 869
- Joined: Jul 27, 2018
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
I was thirsty for a trade. This didn't satisfy...
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,941
- And1: 5,624
- Joined: Jan 19, 2014
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
HartfordWhalers wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Philly paid $2M per Shams
Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?
More likely is used to move up.
#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.
Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?
The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend, does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?
So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,277
- And1: 98,031
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
Alonzo_Morning wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Philly paid $2M per Shams
Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?
More likely is used to move up.
#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.
Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?
The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?
So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?
The league sets a cap every year on how much cash you can send or receive in trades. Otherwise rich teams would just buy up talent from poorer teams. It's a competitive balance issue.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,941
- And1: 5,624
- Joined: Jan 19, 2014
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
Texas Chuck wrote:Alonzo_Morning wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:
Philly had 3.6m left to spend; interesting to see if they then spend the remaining 1.6m... which should get what, pick 57?
More likely is used to move up.
#50, #53 and 1.6m cash for #38.
Chicago gets 2 picks and some $$; Philly consolidates?
The 2 million doesn't affect Pels salary spend does it? It just goes into Gayle's purse, yeah?
So why do Philly have a 3.6mil budget to spend when salary spends aren't affected?
The league sets a cap every year on how much cash you can send or receive in trades. Otherwise rich teams would just buy up talent from poorer teams. It's a competitive balance issue.
Gotcha, thanks
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,850
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers Mega Trade
Wilfried wrote:Colbinii wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Who could Philly be targeting here? I'm saying Luka Garza as they need additional center depth with Embiid's injury history, but this could be
Don't they have Reed?
Reed is a wing
A wing who cant pass or shoot?
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 47,322
- And1: 20,916
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
-
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
I don’t have Reed as a wing.
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,848
- And1: 3,364
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: [Shams] Official: Pels/Sixers #53 for 2m
98. Can cash be included as part of a trade package?
Players can be traded for cash, and cash can be included in trade packages. The amount of cash a team can pay or receive per season is limited to the "Maximum Annual Cash Limit," which is $5.1 million in 2017-18, with the amount in each subsequent season determined by applying the percentage change in the salary cap to the previous amount. For example, if the salary cap increases by 4% from 2017-18 to 2018-19, then the Maximum Annual Cash Limit will increase by 4% from 2017-18 to 2018-19.
Season.......Amount
2017-18....$5.100 million
2018-19....$5.243 million
2019-20....$5.617 million
There are two separate limits, one for the cash a team pays as part of trades each season, and the other for the cash a team receives as part of trades each season. For example, in 2017-18 a team may pay up to an aggregate $5.1 million in all trades it makes during the season, and it may receive up to an aggregate $5.1 million in all trades it makes during the season.
The cash applies to the current season's limit even if it changes hands in a future season. For example, suppose a team trades a draft pick that is top-20 protected this season, top-10 protected next season, and converts to $1 million cash if a pick is not conveyed by next season. $1 million is applied to the team's Maximum Annual Cash Limit for the current season.
Cash is NOT considered when matching salaries under the Traded Player exception. For example, a taxpaying team cannot add $3 million cash to a trade of their $5 million player in order to acquire a $10 million player.
In a sign-and-trade arrangement, if the contract contains a signing bonus, then any amount of this bonus paid by the signing team counts toward the team's Maximum Annual Cash Limit (see question number 92).
Return to Trades and Transactions