what would u give for diop?????
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
Re: what would u give for diop?????
-
Rand10
- Starter
- Posts: 2,292
- And1: 42
- Joined: Mar 21, 2007
Re: what would u give for diop?????
shrink wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
My question: If a team trades for Diop, is it a five month rental? What future rights are included?
This is his 3rd year with Dallas, so it should be full bird rights.
-
MN Die Hard
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Shrink I dont disagree that Diop still raw...he is. But I dont know how fair it is to call McCants a "lottery pick player" when talking about a trade with another lottery pick. I could be misreading your meaning, but to me it sounds like you're implying that McCants has more value because he was a lottery pick, when in reality Diop was too, and in fact he was six picks higher than Rashad. Plus, like I said, I think its safe to say that both guys have underachieved so far; its not like Diop is raw while McCants is a polished SG or something.
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,426
- And1: 19,479
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
MN Die Hard wrote:Shrink I dont disagree that Diop still raw...he is. But I dont know how fair it is to call McCants a "lottery pick player" when talking about a trade with another lottery pick. I could be misreading your meaning, but to me it sounds like you're implying that McCants has more value because he was a lottery pick, when in reality Diop was too, and in fact he was six picks higher than Rashad. Plus, like I said, I think its safe to say that both guys have underachieved so far; its not like Diop is raw while McCants is a polished SG or something.
Two differences for me.
After the microfracture surgery, this is the first real chance to see whether McCants is a boon or a bust. We saw some of him his rookie year, and of course, in college, but really, barely 1 year in the pro's.
Diop is in his seventh season in the NBA. I'm not saying he's a bust, but at what time do you say "why are you still raw?"
More improtantly, why trade McCants, who's locked up another year, for Diop who could bolt after this season? Unless he gets some sort of sign-and-trade deal, he's a rental, and as a rebuilding team, MIN has little reason to rent.
-
C.lupus
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
catalyst wrote:NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade
I wouldn't go that far. I'm at least offering a SG with some potenial and a backup center.
What would you like from the Wolves? We don't have a big to give (that's why I want Diop) but we have Boston's first next year and some good role players (Gomes, Smith, Telfair) as well as McCants. Jaric's contract sucks but he would be a good 2-way guard for you.
-
MN Die Hard
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
catalyst wrote:NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade
That's just ridiculous. POB over McCants and Richard???
Shrink I totally agree on your comments about Diop's free agency. But as for McCants I guess that just depends on how you think he'll turn out. Its true, we've seen a bigger body of work for Diop, and he still hasnt lived up to his potential. I'd still roll the dice, even though Rashad might develop into a nice SG. I think others are higher on him than I am though.
- JES12
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,863
- And1: 128
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
This whole thread is disgusting!
I blame Avery for having to read such filth because he does not let them play. Both Diop and Hassell are worth more than any trade in this thread. They have produced when they do get on the floor. I mean really, Diop still out-produces Ben Wallace per minute.
Common guys, I'll give Anthony parker credit, but Garbajosa? Please, don't make me puke. The rest of the trades are even more awful.
Sneeking in Barea as if he is a "throw-in" is just horid.
I blame Avery for having to read such filth because he does not let them play. Both Diop and Hassell are worth more than any trade in this thread. They have produced when they do get on the floor. I mean really, Diop still out-produces Ben Wallace per minute.
Common guys, I'll give Anthony parker credit, but Garbajosa? Please, don't make me puke. The rest of the trades are even more awful.
Sneeking in Barea as if he is a "throw-in" is just horid.
- JES12
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,863
- And1: 128
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
What about we just keep Diop.
Depth at positions of defense (especially the 1 & 5) are important.
We don't need 5 deep at the 2 with Jones, Smith, Stackhouse, Hassell and Ager. 6 if you count Jet.
Diop fits on our team. Diop is what we needs, especially if Dampier gets into foul trouble. I rather have him as an expiring than any other expiring listed on this tread.
Trading Diop would be a mistake.
Depth at positions of defense (especially the 1 & 5) are important.
We don't need 5 deep at the 2 with Jones, Smith, Stackhouse, Hassell and Ager. 6 if you count Jet.
Diop fits on our team. Diop is what we needs, especially if Dampier gets into foul trouble. I rather have him as an expiring than any other expiring listed on this tread.
Trading Diop would be a mistake.
-
thaAteam
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,027
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 21, 2007
diop has not been playing lately hes been riding the bench, hes not an all star at best he is a solid backup in the league, jr smith is the better player but due to depth for denver and ai being a staple at the two there is no need for him, the mavs could throw in a swing man a two for reggie evens but to say damp fits thats bs
- deeney0
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,594
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Cambridge, MA
catalyst wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade
Um, no? I think the Mavs can get more for Diop than Shad, but at least Shad can shoot. POB is nadda.
I don't see why Dallas wouldn't want to keep Diop. Is there a fear he will command more money in the offseason than the Mavs are willing to pay?
-
Rand10
- Starter
- Posts: 2,292
- And1: 42
- Joined: Mar 21, 2007
JES12 wrote:This whole thread is disgusting!
I blame Avery for having to read such filth because he does not let them play. Both Diop and Hassell are worth more than any trade in this thread. They have produced when they do get on the floor. I mean really, Diop still out-produces Ben Wallace per minute.
Common guys, I'll give Anthony parker credit, but Garbajosa? Please, don't make me puke. The rest of the trades are even more awful.
Sneeking in Barea as if he is a "throw-in" is just horid.
He wasn't trying to sneak in Barea. The trade wouldn't work with just Parker/Garbajosa for Diop/Hassell. It's not like Barea has a ton of value anyway. He's a 3rd stringer right now because of Harris and Terry, and that's not going to change any time soon. Hassell is solid but he could only fetch Buckner this offseason. I think you're overrating those 2 a little bit.
Return to Trades and Transactions











