what would u give for diop?????

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
HTown_TMac
General Manager
Posts: 9,060
And1: 222
Joined: Oct 08, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas.
   

 

Post#21 » by HTown_TMac » Thu Jan 3, 2008 6:34 pm

Rcokets would love him... Don't know what to give though
Image
www.atrilli.net <- music blog
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

 

Post#22 » by C.lupus » Thu Jan 3, 2008 6:50 pm

catalyst wrote:Only if the mavs want to re-hire nelson and become the Warriors. Some may say that would be a good idea. Mavs would need a big back for Diop, or they are left with Dampier and Brandon Bass at C.


How about McCants and Chris Richard?
Rand10
Starter
Posts: 2,292
And1: 42
Joined: Mar 21, 2007

Re: what would u give for diop????? 

Post#23 » by Rand10 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 6:54 pm

shrink wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



My question: If a team trades for Diop, is it a five month rental? What future rights are included?


This is his 3rd year with Dallas, so it should be full bird rights.
Rand10
Starter
Posts: 2,292
And1: 42
Joined: Mar 21, 2007

 

Post#24 » by Rand10 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 6:57 pm

bryant08 wrote:Raps/Mavs:

Anthony Parker
Jorge Garbajosa
for
DeSagana Diop
Trenton Hassell
Jose Juan Barea


I love this one.
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#25 » by MN Die Hard » Thu Jan 3, 2008 6:58 pm

Shrink I dont disagree that Diop still raw...he is. But I dont know how fair it is to call McCants a "lottery pick player" when talking about a trade with another lottery pick. I could be misreading your meaning, but to me it sounds like you're implying that McCants has more value because he was a lottery pick, when in reality Diop was too, and in fact he was six picks higher than Rashad. Plus, like I said, I think its safe to say that both guys have underachieved so far; its not like Diop is raw while McCants is a polished SG or something.
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

 

Post#26 » by bryant08 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 7:08 pm

mavfan33 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I love this one.


Turns out my fellow Raps fans don't approve. Would you be willing to add in a top 25 protected 1st in 08?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,426
And1: 19,479
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#27 » by shrink » Thu Jan 3, 2008 7:25 pm

MN Die Hard wrote:Shrink I dont disagree that Diop still raw...he is. But I dont know how fair it is to call McCants a "lottery pick player" when talking about a trade with another lottery pick. I could be misreading your meaning, but to me it sounds like you're implying that McCants has more value because he was a lottery pick, when in reality Diop was too, and in fact he was six picks higher than Rashad. Plus, like I said, I think its safe to say that both guys have underachieved so far; its not like Diop is raw while McCants is a polished SG or something.


Two differences for me.

After the microfracture surgery, this is the first real chance to see whether McCants is a boon or a bust. We saw some of him his rookie year, and of course, in college, but really, barely 1 year in the pro's.

Diop is in his seventh season in the NBA. I'm not saying he's a bust, but at what time do you say "why are you still raw?"

More improtantly, why trade McCants, who's locked up another year, for Diop who could bolt after this season? Unless he gets some sort of sign-and-trade deal, he's a rental, and as a rebuilding team, MIN has little reason to rent.
Rand10
Starter
Posts: 2,292
And1: 42
Joined: Mar 21, 2007

 

Post#28 » by Rand10 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 7:27 pm

bryant08 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Turns out my fellow Raps fans don't approve. Would you be willing to add in a top 25 protected 1st in 08?


Yeah, I'd have no problem with that.
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

 

Post#29 » by bryant08 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 7:42 pm

^Done deal from my POV for the Raps. I think Diop would have a big role in their future, and Hassell isn't bad either.
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#30 » by catalyst » Thu Jan 3, 2008 7:57 pm

C.lupus wrote:How about McCants and Chris Richard?


NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

 

Post#31 » by C.lupus » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:13 pm

catalyst wrote:NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade

I wouldn't go that far. I'm at least offering a SG with some potenial and a backup center.

What would you like from the Wolves? We don't have a big to give (that's why I want Diop) but we have Boston's first next year and some good role players (Gomes, Smith, Telfair) as well as McCants. Jaric's contract sucks but he would be a good 2-way guard for you.
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#32 » by MN Die Hard » Thu Jan 3, 2008 9:14 pm

catalyst wrote:NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade


That's just ridiculous. POB over McCants and Richard???

Shrink I totally agree on your comments about Diop's free agency. But as for McCants I guess that just depends on how you think he'll turn out. Its true, we've seen a bigger body of work for Diop, and he still hasnt lived up to his potential. I'd still roll the dice, even though Rashad might develop into a nice SG. I think others are higher on him than I am though.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#33 » by JES12 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:46 am

This whole thread is disgusting!

I blame Avery for having to read such filth because he does not let them play. Both Diop and Hassell are worth more than any trade in this thread. They have produced when they do get on the floor. I mean really, Diop still out-produces Ben Wallace per minute.

Common guys, I'll give Anthony parker credit, but Garbajosa? Please, don't make me puke. The rest of the trades are even more awful.

Sneeking in Barea as if he is a "throw-in" is just horid.
thaAteam
Banned User
Posts: 2,027
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

 

Post#34 » by thaAteam » Fri Jan 4, 2008 2:53 am

so what about diop for jr smith straight up and the mavs try to sign pj brown or c webb again. jr smith if he could stay outta trouble would be an excellent fit in dallas as a starting two on a great young core of guys
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#35 » by JES12 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 2:59 am

What about we just keep Diop.

Depth at positions of defense (especially the 1 & 5) are important.

We don't need 5 deep at the 2 with Jones, Smith, Stackhouse, Hassell and Ager. 6 if you count Jet.

Diop fits on our team. Diop is what we needs, especially if Dampier gets into foul trouble. I rather have him as an expiring than any other expiring listed on this tread.

Trading Diop would be a mistake.
thaAteam
Banned User
Posts: 2,027
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

 

Post#36 » by thaAteam » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:12 am

diop has not been playing lately hes been riding the bench, hes not an all star at best he is a solid backup in the league, jr smith is the better player but due to depth for denver and ai being a staple at the two there is no need for him, the mavs could throw in a swing man a two for reggie evens but to say damp fits thats bs
thaAteam
Banned User
Posts: 2,027
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

 

Post#37 » by thaAteam » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:15 am

i meant steven hunter and the mavs could throw in a 2nd rounder
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#38 » by deeney0 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:15 am

catalyst wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



NO! mavs can do better. Even the Patrick O'b trade is better than your trade


Um, no? I think the Mavs can get more for Diop than Shad, but at least Shad can shoot. POB is nadda.

I don't see why Dallas wouldn't want to keep Diop. Is there a fear he will command more money in the offseason than the Mavs are willing to pay?
DDansby123
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1
Joined: May 22, 2002

 

Post#39 » by DDansby123 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:16 am

dflaschberger wrote:Ben Wallace for Diop and whatever they have to sign KVH for to make it work.


I'd do the following...

Diop, KVH, Mavs' 2008 1st for Wallace, Bulls' 2008 1st.

I don't think Cuban would take on the salary, though.
Rand10
Starter
Posts: 2,292
And1: 42
Joined: Mar 21, 2007

 

Post#40 » by Rand10 » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:16 am

JES12 wrote:This whole thread is disgusting!

I blame Avery for having to read such filth because he does not let them play. Both Diop and Hassell are worth more than any trade in this thread. They have produced when they do get on the floor. I mean really, Diop still out-produces Ben Wallace per minute.

Common guys, I'll give Anthony parker credit, but Garbajosa? Please, don't make me puke. The rest of the trades are even more awful.

Sneeking in Barea as if he is a "throw-in" is just horid.


He wasn't trying to sneak in Barea. The trade wouldn't work with just Parker/Garbajosa for Diop/Hassell. It's not like Barea has a ton of value anyway. He's a 3rd stringer right now because of Harris and Terry, and that's not going to change any time soon. Hassell is solid but he could only fetch Buckner this offseason. I think you're overrating those 2 a little bit.

Return to Trades and Transactions