Which Player/Team are you tired of seeing on REALGM?
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
- Det the Threat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,385
- And1: 374
- Joined: Aug 29, 2004
- Location: Germany
-
Knicks fans trying to trade Crawford and Robinson to the Sonics, because they're "hometown heros". Please stop it and while we're at it, there's nothing outside of David Lee(so no, "the great" low post offense of Curry or Randolph doesn't interest us as well) on your team that would interest the Sonics.
Cavs fans trying to send Larry Hughes to the Sonics. This one's been beaten to death, but it still is proposed at least once a week, it seems.
Cavs fans trying to send Larry Hughes to the Sonics. This one's been beaten to death, but it still is proposed at least once a week, it seems.
- breaker91
- Starter
- Posts: 2,125
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 07, 2007
- Location: Portland, where meniscus tears happen
4ho5ive wrote:Iguodala commands major respect and anything less than Jesus+1st rounder wont get it done.
Philly get's screwed in that deal. The value for Jesus was set in the offseason. Wally world and a #5 pick.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0020931/
-
#1knickfan
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,590
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 26, 2007
VintaGe36 wrote:^I dont know why everyone points at the Knicks, I've been on this board a few months, and Kings,Sixers,Lakers, and Cavs players are usually the most discussed, with a dash of Pacers and Hawks here and there.
Believe me, in reality the Knicks are definately the most brought up team on these boards. Shagedelic makes the worst trades in the history of mankind much to my chagrin he seems to be addicted to making massive Knick trades.
-
#1knickfan
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,590
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 26, 2007
VintaGe36 wrote:^I dont know why everyone points at the Knicks, I've been on this board a few months, and Kings,Sixers,Lakers, and Cavs players are usually the most discussed, with a dash of Pacers and Hawks here and there.
Believe me, in reality the Knicks are definately the most brought up team on these boards. Shagedelic makes the worst trades in the history of mankind much to my chagrin he seems to be addicted to making massive Knick trades.
-
#1knickfan
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,590
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 26, 2007
OGSactownballer wrote:The fools who equate Renaldo Balkman (WHO?) to Artest and act like they're doing us a favor. And the same ones who think that David Lee is the next coming of Kevin McHale.
Also, anybody not named LeBron on the Cavs roster.
This coming from representitive of a group of people who seem to equate Ron Artest with Kevin Garnett in terms of trade value. Come on man, cut the bull$hit. No one ever equated Balkman to Artest or Lee to McHale so stop making things up.
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,640
- And1: 19,739
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
#1knickfan wrote: This coming from representitive of a group of people who seem to equate Ron Artest with Kevin Garnett in terms of trade value.
To be fair, most teams made bad offers for KG, but I've never heard a SAC fan make the claim Artest had the same trade value as KG.
However, I remember two seperate Knicks fans post here that they wouldn't trade Channing Frye for Kevin Garnett straight up, so we should probably all lay off the group insinuations.
- old rem
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,753
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jun 14, 2005
- Location: Witness Protection
The Lakers seem to have the notion that a package of Kwame + Odum gets ANYTHING...especially if Crittendon is added. Knick fans do seem pretty aware that they have some guys they want to ship--who have the market value of a toxic waste dump..but they desperatelt try. Likewise...Clev fans know they can't get the full benefit of LeBron until he gets help---but a Gooden-Newble-Snow package won't fetch much.
Bulls posts seem to think Gordon is gold and Tyrus Thomas + Gordon =Pick-a-Star. Not quite.
Meanwhile....I suspect Indy is not in any hurry to trade away JO. No doubt they listen to offers,but won't take the mediocre deals that get re-cycled every few weeks and never did get off the ground. Similar story with Gasol. Here...posts seem to assume the Griz just toss in Miller or Navarro..and you get that all for guys you can easily spare.
The Griz are NOT as good on the hardwood as they are on paper. They need to figure out why. I don't see them lurching into some move where they convert their 2 top guys into raffle tickets and projects and good bench types.
Kirilenko deals are....frustrating...in that few players show such an ability to swing from great to crap. Meanwhile---he don't come cheap.
For a team to Give or Get him...they REALLY have to do some up close + personal inspection and get some idea of what to expect.
Bulls posts seem to think Gordon is gold and Tyrus Thomas + Gordon =Pick-a-Star. Not quite.
Meanwhile....I suspect Indy is not in any hurry to trade away JO. No doubt they listen to offers,but won't take the mediocre deals that get re-cycled every few weeks and never did get off the ground. Similar story with Gasol. Here...posts seem to assume the Griz just toss in Miller or Navarro..and you get that all for guys you can easily spare.
The Griz are NOT as good on the hardwood as they are on paper. They need to figure out why. I don't see them lurching into some move where they convert their 2 top guys into raffle tickets and projects and good bench types.
Kirilenko deals are....frustrating...in that few players show such an ability to swing from great to crap. Meanwhile---he don't come cheap.
For a team to Give or Get him...they REALLY have to do some up close + personal inspection and get some idea of what to expect.
CENSORED... No comment.
-
#1knickfan
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,590
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 26, 2007
shrink wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
To be fair, most teams made bad offers for KG, but I've never heard a SAC fan make the claim Artest had the same trade value as KG.
However, I remember two seperate Knicks fans post here that they wouldn't trade Channing Frye for Kevin Garnett straight up, so we should probably all lay off the group insinuations.
Well that's the problem with insinuations like this because just because someone says they wouldn't trade a particularly young player in exchange for a particular established player it doesn't mean they think the young player is better or more valuable than the established player.
-
Toine85
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,400
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
- Location: In the Knicks' Front Office
-
-
positivetension
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,916
- And1: 1,312
- Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Duffman100 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
While I understand that he is overrated by Raptor fans, 14 points and 10 assists a game is not a backup.
I was being sarcastic. Everyone knocks him because he is 'just a backup', as a starter he is putting up 14-10 on 50% shooting in 36mins. He's the real deal so I don't see why teams propose trades where they give up minimal value to try attain him.
Return to Trades and Transactions














