Portland/Minny

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

Post Reply
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#21 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 5, 2008 10:48 pm

^^I've never heard of a team not needing more all-stars. But what ever you say...
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Top
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#22 » by kandiking » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:10 am

this does not make much sense from minnesota. with fernandez and oden portland is a playoff team now.
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.
Top
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

 

Post#23 » by Vindicater » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:14 am

I love Rudy, watched him carve up some quality players in the last International game I saw.

Kid is a STUD!
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Top
User avatar
Milkdud
RealGM
Posts: 12,095
And1: 137
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Dreaming of Australia

 

Post#24 » by Milkdud » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:49 am

shrink wrote:Its not unfair, but if I'm MIN, I pass. They can't really afford to trade away the #3 pick and see him become a star elsewhere.

However, there's good news for POR. They don't need the third pick if they are after Bayless, because there's no way MIN picks him at #3. Talk to SEA at #4, and the price might be more economical.


I rarely agree with Shrink but in this case he is a 100% correct. Portland offers an inticing package but Minny needs big time singular talent.
Top
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,476
And1: 19,550
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#25 » by shrink » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:57 am

uhh.. thanks?
Top
User avatar
Milkdud
RealGM
Posts: 12,095
And1: 137
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Dreaming of Australia

 

Post#26 » by Milkdud » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:08 am

shrink wrote:uhh.. thanks?



:dontknow: Just being honest hombre, I value you option especially about the wolves. But we are divisional rivals so I don't expect us to see eye to eye.


I was being honest:banghead:
Top
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,688
And1: 14,054
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

 

Post#27 » by Effigy » Fri Jun 6, 2008 6:44 am

If Rudy was in this draft he might BE the #3 pick. Why would we trade him in a package?
Top
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

 

Post#28 » by Vindicater » Fri Jun 6, 2008 7:20 am

Bonzi wrote:If Rudy was in this draft he might BE the #3 pick. Why would we trade him in a package?


He would be damn close.

I think he would probably fall to around 6-9 in this draft
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Top
User avatar
SinceClyde
Pro Prospect
Posts: 992
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Location: Portland, OR
         

 

Post#29 » by SinceClyde » Sat Jun 7, 2008 7:32 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:Personally, I don't think Fernandez' rights hold ANY value. Because I don't think he's coming over. I know what you've read, and I know your hopes are high. But when he signs on that dotted line, then his value gets high. There is VERY tempting money being offered to him right now compared to the pittance the Blazers can extend him.


Seems you were wrong as Rudy just told the media he will be a blazer.
Since Clyde The Glide
Top
Post Reply

Return to Trades and Transactions

 

 

More Basketball News »