Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers
zong wrote:
btw, i'm not vetoing the RJ-Minny deal, its a lot more fair since Fatoine's long deal goes to NJ
revprodeji wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
His deal has an out clause next summer. Thus, he is only a 2 year deal and a large expiring after this summer.
A MN fan would have known that.
skorff26 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
yes i did know that, and for your information i'm a minnesota fan as well.
it's a game, and so many different teams are rebuilding, so i decided to have fun and try to build a team to compete right now. if the trades wouldn't have been vetoed i'd have Al, Brand, RJ with mccants (still had him in the first trade that got vetoed), thorton, gomes, telfair, miami's and boston's picks to get me a SG and PG... i could easily had a team that could compete with anyone in the league, but minnesota is rebuilding and since I decided not to rebuild all my trades must be crap then... that makes a lot of sense.
JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
zong wrote:The Portland Trail Blazers and the Cleveland Cavaliers have come to an agreement on a minor deal.
Portland Trades:
Sergio Rodriguez
2008 Second Round Pick (belonging to Indiana or Phoenix, choice belonging to Indiana)
2010 Second Round Pick
Cleveland Trades:
Daniel Gibson
Trade ID #4488181
The reason for Portland to do this is to simply acquire an above-average PG who can shoot and defend next to to Brandon Roy. Sergio has shown glimpses of becoming a decent player and we wish him good luck in all his future endeavors.
This method is to extreme. The veto system is fine, I think that there are fine trades that are passing. I think both wolves trades being vetoed deserve them. Randy Foye and Brewer are worth way more then R.J. In the other trade, the clippers are getting the "chance" of a top 5 pick, and the "chance" of signing a bonified star. When they traded away one, and not to mention a good prospect in thornton. And the Twolves don't even need brand, they have a player who is a very similar player in Jefferson.babyjax13 wrote:I think these vetos are just plain stupid. It worked in the last game because people weren't just throwing them around, so I voted to keep it, but after looking back to me it seems that it might be a bad idea. I think that you should get ony one veto, and even if the veto passes on a trade, you shouldn't get it back, that way your not vetoing a trade unless someone is really getting pounded. 3 vetos should still be all you need to stop a trade, but no one gets more than one veto. (btw, this works out to about 10 vetos).
roseorbust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
This method is to extreme. The veto system is fine, I think that there are fine trades that are passing. I think both wolves trades being vetoed deserve them. Randy Foye and Brewer are worth way more then R.J. In the other trade, the clippers are getting the "chance" of a top 5 pick, and the "chance" of signing a bonified star. When they traded away one, and not to mention a good prospect in thornton. And the Twolves don't even need brand, they have a player who is a very similar player in Jefferson.
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
ss_maverick wrote:yeah srsly there are too many vetoes around.
One trade I think that definitely deserves a veto though is JO and Garcia for Blount, Haslem and other crap. I mean, really? Wtf?
Return to Trades and Transactions
