Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3
Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers
Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
-
Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
Spurs out: Dejounte + Aminu + Lonnie Walker + Bulls 2025 1st + Spurs 2022 1st + Spurs 2024 1st
Spurs in: Ben Simmons + Deandre Jordan + Thybulle
Nets out: Kyrie + Deandre Jordan
Nets in: Dejounte Murray + Robert Covington + Aminu + Lonnie Walker
Blazers out: Dame + Covington
Blazers in: Kyrie Irving + Thad Young + Bulls 2025 1st + Spurs 2022 1st + Spurs 2024 1st
76ers out: Ben Simmons + ThyBulle
76ers in: Dame
Spurs get their man and get a pretty complete roster with AMAZING defense
White/Tre/Forbes
Vassell/Thybulle/Forbes
Keldon/Ben Simmons
Ben Simmons/Samanic/Collins
Poeltl/Deandre
Nets get better and more stable fits around KD/Harden. Dejounte would excel with all the spacing and Lonnie would be an amazing 6th man for that team.
Blazers stay competitive and get assets to improve further.
76ers get their man
Who says no?
Spurs in: Ben Simmons + Deandre Jordan + Thybulle
Nets out: Kyrie + Deandre Jordan
Nets in: Dejounte Murray + Robert Covington + Aminu + Lonnie Walker
Blazers out: Dame + Covington
Blazers in: Kyrie Irving + Thad Young + Bulls 2025 1st + Spurs 2022 1st + Spurs 2024 1st
76ers out: Ben Simmons + ThyBulle
76ers in: Dame
Spurs get their man and get a pretty complete roster with AMAZING defense
White/Tre/Forbes
Vassell/Thybulle/Forbes
Keldon/Ben Simmons
Ben Simmons/Samanic/Collins
Poeltl/Deandre
Nets get better and more stable fits around KD/Harden. Dejounte would excel with all the spacing and Lonnie would be an amazing 6th man for that team.
Blazers stay competitive and get assets to improve further.
76ers get their man
Who says no?
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,626
- And1: 43,869
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
76ers need playmaking in return for Simmons..
That's pretty non-negotiable.
That's pretty non-negotiable.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Simmons to Wolves (with Cavs)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,996
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
-
Re: Simmons to Wolves (with Cavs)
Sexton is significantly better than McDaniels+ 2nds. Beasley is at best neutral value right now. He just got out of prison ffs, he isn't an asset. And Cavs give up Nance on top? Insane.
On Sixers side it's somewhat acceptable, but Wolves are just stealing value from Cavs, so it's not realistic at all.
On Sixers side it's somewhat acceptable, but Wolves are just stealing value from Cavs, so it's not realistic at all.
Re: Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,756
- And1: 14,106
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
POR does not entertain this idea.
Lillard is better than Irving, has leadership qualities and is not a kook.
The incentive does not come close to bridging the gap.
Absolute non starter.
Lillard is better than Irving, has leadership qualities and is not a kook.
The incentive does not come close to bridging the gap.
Absolute non starter.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Simmons to Wolves (with Cavs)
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,626
- And1: 43,869
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Simmons to Wolves (with Cavs)
McDaniels isn't tradeable because no team loves him like Minny. In any trade, Minny would think they are giving something big and the receiving team would be thinking "thanks for this late first sophomore, where's the rest?"
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,748
- And1: 3,964
- Joined: Nov 08, 2016
-
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
WindyCityBorn wrote:Bulls are not doing this because we not going into the luxury tax to add depth pieces. And definitely not at the expense of salary dumping White. I think we keep Lauri on the QO. Bulls hold all the cards with him.
At this stage in the free agency game. No one wants Lauri. Unless in a sign and trade. And frankly most teams don’t want to commit much to him
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 179
- And1: 107
- Joined: Jun 22, 2021
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
Am I the only one who kind of likes the idea of taking a gamble on the next 4-5 years of Timberwolves' draft assets?
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,996
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
kuclas wrote:cool93 wrote:life_saver wrote:there is no way on earth Wolves are gonna involve Ant in any trade deals structured around Simmons
I don't believe the deal could be done than. It's literally salary fillers+picks, and that's laughable even for current Bens value.
That's why a third team needs to get involved that can be sent picks and Sixers actually getting a useful point guard who can play 30 minutes and get to the rim and shoot from outside.
3rd team won't help if all Wolves send is salary + picks, just not enough value.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,996
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
Henesey wrote:Am I the only one who kind of likes the idea of taking a gamble on the next 4-5 years of Timberwolves' draft assets?
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
For all Simmons problems, he is awesome player in regular season and a very good floor raiser. Wolves would be in playoffs with him, so picks likely won't be juicy.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,748
- And1: 3,964
- Joined: Nov 08, 2016
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
Henesey wrote:Am I the only one who kind of likes the idea of taking a gamble on the next 4-5 years of Timberwolves' draft assets?
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
People don’t realize these days. Simmons can keep the Sixers team afloat with 500 ball when Embiid is out his usual 20 games
Simmons is going to get towns Edwards at least in the playoffs so the future picks will 16-20 range.
So getting a bunch of role players and a couple of 16-20 first round picks for Simmons.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 47,322
- And1: 20,917
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
gambitx777 wrote:I don't think so at all. Beal has a year after this one yes he's got an opt out and he's up for a max extension but that's workable. This puts philly well in true contender range. For mini it's probably less than DM was gonna milk from them alone. For the wiz they get two looks at a Beal replacement and some picks and more movable vets to part out to get value from a rebuild.HartfordWhalers wrote:gambitx777 wrote:If the wiz loose 15 of their first 20 or something like that . I would be ok with a deal structured around this
Beal to Philly
Simmons to mini
Edwards, springer, a number of picks 2 at least from mini and filler to DC or a 4th team for value.
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
That feels extremely ambitious for Washington. A #1 pick and 3 firsts? And all if Washington has an expiring Beal and is losing 75% of their games?
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
I don’t know why the PO counts as Beal under contract. Is he not worth his deal ?
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 179
- And1: 107
- Joined: Jun 22, 2021
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
cool93 wrote:Henesey wrote:Am I the only one who kind of likes the idea of taking a gamble on the next 4-5 years of Timberwolves' draft assets?
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
For all Simmons problems, he is awesome player in regular season and a very good flour raiser. Wolves would be in playoffs with him, so picks likely won't be juicy.
Yeah, I agree with that, as I said It's definitely a gamble.
D-Lo has missed a lot of basketball the past two years as has KAT.
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
- Chicago-Bull-E
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,296
- And1: 7,628
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
kuclas wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:Bulls are not doing this because we not going into the luxury tax to add depth pieces. And definitely not at the expense of salary dumping White. I think we keep Lauri on the QO. Bulls hold all the cards with him.
At this stage in the free agency game. No one wants Lauri. Unless in a sign and trade. And frankly most teams don’t want to commit much to him
Fortunately for Chicago they don’t have to do anything, get him back on the QO for only a year, and they use money they can’t use on free agents to do so.
Doing nothing is likely one of the best outcomes for Chicago.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Re: Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,996
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
-
Re: Spurs-Nets-Blazers-76ers
Cklbmk wrote:Spurs out: Dejounte + Aminu + Lonnie Walker + Bulls 2025 1st + Spurs 2022 1st + Spurs 2024 1st
Spurs in: Ben Simmons + Deandre Jordan + Thybulle
Nets out: Kyrie + Deandre Jordan
Nets in: Dejounte Murray + Robert Covington + Aminu + Lonnie Walker
Blazers out: Dame + Covington
Blazers in: Kyrie Irving + Thad Young + Bulls 2025 1st + Spurs 2022 1st + Spurs 2024 1st
76ers out: Ben Simmons + ThyBulle
76ers in: Dame
Spurs get their man and get a pretty complete roster with AMAZING defense
White/Tre/Forbes
Vassell/Thybulle/Forbes
Keldon/Ben Simmons
Ben Simmons/Samanic/Collins
Poeltl/Deandre
Nets get better and more stable fits around KD/Harden. Dejounte would excel with all the spacing and Lonnie would be an amazing 6th man for that team.
Blazers stay competitive and get assets to improve further.
76ers get their man
Who says no?
I thinks Sixers definitely steal a lot of value here, we need to add A LOT to Ben to get Lillard at this point.
I son'e see why Nets do this. Kyrie was awesome last year and they have enough depth as is, and I don't think Portland would be interested in Kyrie (he won't be interested to play there either)
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 179
- And1: 107
- Joined: Jun 22, 2021
-
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
kuclas wrote:Henesey wrote:Am I the only one who kind of likes the idea of taking a gamble on the next 4-5 years of Timberwolves' draft assets?
The Wolves will be capped out, have a very hard time attracting free agents, and have had one +500 season since trading KG. If the Simmons situation turns out like Butler then the Sixers are laughing, if not they have added flexibility and aren't bringing back a distressed asset in Simmons.
People don’t realize these days. Simmons can keep the Sixers team afloat with 500 ball when Embiid is out his usual 20 games
Simmons is going to get towns Edwards at least in the playoffs so the future picks will 16-20 range.
So getting a bunch of role players and a couple of 16-20 first round picks for Simmons.
I said exactly the same thing when they signed Butler or the Celtics when we got all those 'useless' picks from the nets. Since the Butler trade to Philly they have had picks 6, 1, and 7.
These picks might be a bit more enticing for Portland than Simmons is at the trade deadline.
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,133
- And1: 11,815
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
-
Re: Simmons to Minny, with Chi
Chicago-Bull-E wrote:kuclas wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:Bulls are not doing this because we not going into the luxury tax to add depth pieces. And definitely not at the expense of salary dumping White. I think we keep Lauri on the QO. Bulls hold all the cards with him.
At this stage in the free agency game. No one wants Lauri. Unless in a sign and trade. And frankly most teams don’t want to commit much to him
Fortunately for Chicago they don’t have to do anything, get him back on the QO for only a year, and they use money they can’t use on free agents to do so.
Doing nothing is likely one of the best outcomes for Chicago.
Yep I think the Bulls just fine with that scenario which is why Lauri has no leverage at all.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
realball wrote:VeritasTri wrote:BullyKing wrote:The Wolves traded Butler because he was 1/2 of a season away from expiring. Simmons has four years left. Terrible analogy, terrible logic.
They traded him before the season started, not mid season. His only having one year left on his deal simply meant teams would only invest significant assets to get him if they believed they could re-sign him, which is why the suitors were limited to the likes of Philly/Miami/Houston. Simmons desire to play for particular teams accomplishes the same thing, teams like the cavs or magic arent in the running because he doesnt want to play there. Regardless of if its "he will only play for X" or "he will only re-sign with X" the result is the same, lowered competition for services and lowered return for their current team.
Just trade for Lillard bro!![]()
Seriously, its going to be hilarious when Simmons is traded and Philly fans cope with the reality of the return.
It's so sad right now watching Philly fans trying to cope lol. Reality is going to slap them so hard in the face come October.
This is not acceptable on this board. We didn't allow other fans to laugh at Raptors fans saying Lowry would get multiple 1sts at the deadline or when they said it didn't matter because they would get that in a sign and trade.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
- gambitx777
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,543
- And1: 1,988
- Joined: Dec 18, 2012
Re: Minny pushing for Simmons? Maybe WAS helps?
You can argue he's a bargain on his current deal or at least we'll worth it. Even if he extends that year doesn't go away lol it's still there for that price. Any team he goes to can offer him that extension and I can't see him not wanting to stay in philly and be a perennial contender with the 76ers.HartfordWhalers wrote:gambitx777 wrote:I don't think so at all. Beal has a year after this one yes he's got an opt out and he's up for a max extension but that's workable. This puts philly well in true contender range. For mini it's probably less than DM was gonna milk from them alone. For the wiz they get two looks at a Beal replacement and some picks and more movable vets to part out to get value from a rebuild.HartfordWhalers wrote:
That feels extremely ambitious for Washington. A #1 pick and 3 firsts? And all if Washington has an expiring Beal and is losing 75% of their games?
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
I don’t know why the PO counts as Beal under contract. Is he not worth his deal ?
As a wizards fan getting two young blue chip guards, and 3 first for beal, I can live with that.
Mini well they only loose spare parts and Edwards if you think Simmons and towns works then go for it. You have two playable guards that's a young team you can go forward with and see if you can get into contention with a team focused around Simmons and shooters.
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Getting Simmons to the Wolves Without Giving Up KAT/DLo/Edwards
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,137
- And1: 2,882
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Getting Simmons to the Wolves Without Giving Up KAT/DLo/Edwards
SNPA wrote:Wolveswin wrote:SNPA wrote:No chance unless Minny gives up every pick and swap possible and a third team sends win now pieces.
So Philly gets more for Simmons than Rockets for Harden? Got it.
So Morey is going to trade Simmons to a team and not get any of the three best players or all the picks? Those picks will be late firsts.
Yes. Same as Nets did.
3x Wolves 1sts + 4x Wolves 1st Swaps > Nets Package for Harden
Simmons does NOT get that much.
Re: Getting Simmons to the Wolves Without Giving Up KAT/DLo/Edwards
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,190
- And1: 8,562
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Getting Simmons to the Wolves Without Giving Up KAT/DLo/Edwards
Wolveswin wrote:SNPA wrote:Wolveswin wrote:So Philly gets more for Simmons than Rockets for Harden? Got it.
So Morey is going to trade Simmons to a team and not get any of the three best players or all the picks? Those picks will be late firsts.
Yes. Same as Nets did.
3x Wolves 1sts + 4x Wolves 1st Swaps > Nets Package for Harden
Simmons does NOT get that much.
I agree he doesn’t get that much. It’s what Minny would need, or close to it, minus the top three players.
Return to Trades and Transactions