DoItALL9 wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:DoItALL9 wrote:
What's your planned trade to improve the Thunder?
Aren't you already in the tax?
Nance and Randle are young improving pieces. Randle could possibly replace what Sabonis was going to be for OKC. He shouldn't be expensive <15M, maybe far less.
Do you expect to get a better, more complementary player than kcp to come play with Westbrook with your coming cap space?
Deng seems worthless but would be worth 2 picks which are potential gold with Presti as GM.
(Deng plays hard if nothing else)
I play hard too, but no one is even offering me a 10-day contract.
Look, I like Nance and Randle and KCP. And I'm a big fan of getting picks. But if you're doing this deal, you had better be trading Westbrook, because eating 17mil a year of dead salary for picks is not a move a contending team makes. It's what a tanking team does. Because good luck improving the team with $22mil of boat anchor a year between Singler and Deng.
I'm not saying value is a problem. The problem is direction.
I don't necessarily disagree with you but that's also why I would need to know who you would be looking to trade for realistically that's available. Who's a better complement to Westbrook in theory than PG13? No one comes to mind.
Do you currently consider this team a contender?
What's needed to be one?
I mean, the title of the thread is "Where can OKC trade Melo", not "Where can OKC trade PG13". I don't think Melo's the only problem, but he's one of the most obvious and maybe the easiest to address. If they can get him to buy in and not be what he's always been there's still a chance, but I don't think that'll happen. So I think it starts with him.
Simplistic scheme, inconsistent energy, lack of useful depth, Westbrook turning into a potato, and no one on our roster being able to hit open shots they've hit their entire career are all issues too. I don't know what OKC is right now. I don't know if they know themselves. But internally they haven't given up yet.