[Woj] Horford, Ferg, 1st, 2nd for Danny Green

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Green for Horford and picks: your take?

Green means Go: Sixers win. They trade a redundant, expensive luxury for a need and don't have to add that much.
35
41%
Green around the gills: Thunder win. They're cycling through productive vets and still adding picks along the way.
16
19%
Wait in the Green room: both sides win. Philly improves on the court and OKC improves their stash.
30
35%
The Grass is always Green-er: both sides lose. Green is more rep than production, and OKC didn't get paid enough for taking on Horford.
4
5%
 
Total votes: 85

User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,890
And1: 14,825
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#41 » by tiderulz » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:45 pm

does anyone else have a 1st round draft pick in the next couple of years or does OKC own them all?
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#42 » by loserX » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:46 pm

Read on Twitter
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#43 » by BullyKing » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:46 pm

I guess the trade is fine but I just can't get over how much damage Elton Brand managed to do in a single year.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#44 » by ejftw » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:47 pm

Wow, if Philly can develop Ferguson's jumper, it's an even bigger steal
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,696
And1: 24,902
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#45 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:47 pm

loserX wrote:
Read on Twitter


Ty Jerome can use some competition, I guess.
User avatar
gom
Heat forum: Expert Predictor
Posts: 18,593
And1: 42,674
Joined: May 30, 2014
Location: Earth-616
   

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#46 » by gom » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:47 pm

R-DAWG wrote:Very solid deal for Philly. Not only do you clean up a mistake in Horford, adding Green as a defender/floor spacer will really help their team.

Simmons/Green/Richardson/Harris/EMBIID

Wouldn't be surprised to this expanded with Philly taking back additional pieces from a 3rd team - they have about $15MM or so to play with in a trade and need bench help.


FTFY
Image
I remember 11-30 with these guys. ^
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,803
And1: 5,872
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#47 » by psman2 » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:48 pm

BullyKing wrote:I guess the trade is fine but I just can't get over how much damage Elton Brand managed to do in a single year.


And rewarded with an extension for his efforts. Crazy.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,240
And1: 30,410
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#48 » by Domejandro » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:49 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21
You guys would not **** believe how annoyed I was when Minnesota did not jump in to select Vasilije Micić. I literally have a trade on here from 2015 trying to grease him for Minnesota.

I used to be really damn solid at second round talent evaluation, back when I was younger. Micić is going to be an adequate backup.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,251
And1: 97,981
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#49 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:49 pm

This doesn't really make Philly better or not much. I'm underwhelmed for them. It's perfectly fine value wise but doesn't feel like it really addresses the root of their issues. More to come I guess?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,329
And1: 19,097
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#50 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:49 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:It’s Morey and Presti. They both know exactly what they are doing here. And both probably correctly think they won the trade. Philly trying to win now. Sam is setting up a truckload of picks years from now that as HW said are high variance.

I heard an interview with morey once and he said the key to making trades is to find a GM with the same philosophy as you but you have to be at different places with building your team. Pretty much this.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
tobysunsfan
Junior
Posts: 287
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 17, 2019
     

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#51 » by tobysunsfan » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:50 pm

Home run trade for the Sixers, get two decent role players in Ferguson and Green and off Horford. It's a shame to get rid of a first and high second, especially when you're ultra capped out, but at least it's not 5 picks, some teams would pay a first just to get Green and Ferguson.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,373
And1: 7,507
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#52 » by Dadouv47 » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:51 pm

ejftw wrote:Wow, if Philly can develop Ferguson's jumper, it's an even bigger steal


No way. Getting rid of Ferguson is what I like the most about this trade
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#53 » by loserX » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:51 pm

Salary impact:

Philly saves/OKC takes on:
20/21: $12,134,146
21/22: $27,000,000
22/23: $26,500,000 or can cut him for $14,500,000 dead money

That is a LOT. Horford is still productive but I have this as a clear win for Philly.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,803
And1: 5,872
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#54 » by psman2 » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:53 pm

tobysunsfan wrote:Home run trade for the Sixers, get two decent role players in Ferguson and Green and off Horford. It's a shame to get rid of a first and high second, especially when you're ultra capped out, but at least it's not 5 picks, some teams would pay a first just to get Green and Ferguson.


If that was true then Presti would have made that trade. I got Ferguson as a negative contract that no team would give even cap space for. Green too was not fetching a 1st without long term bad money coming to OKC which is what just happened.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#55 » by BullyKing » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:54 pm

loserX wrote:Salary impact:

Philly saves/OKC takes on:
20/21: $12,134,146
21/22: $27,000,000
22/23: $26,500,000 or can cut him for $14,500,000 dead money

That is a LOT. Horford is still productive but I have this as a clear win for Philly.


I mean it's a win if your goal is for our owner to turn a profit but I can't really say it's a win when if we're minimally better if at all and still have zero cap space for the next millennium.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,241
And1: 19,246
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: [Woj] Horford, Ferg, 1st, 2nd for Danny Green 

Post#56 » by shrink » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:54 pm

OKC Chamber of Commerce asked Presti if he could get the city to host a future NBA Draft.

“Well Adam, most of these draftees 1-30 will be staying here, so why not draft them here?”
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,319
And1: 20,913
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#57 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:55 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:This doesn't really make Philly better or not much. I'm underwhelmed for them. It's perfectly fine value wise but doesn't feel like it really addresses the root of their issues. More to come I guess?


That was what my take was in the redundant thread:
OKC got the high variance and "lightly protected distant 1st", while Philly got less long term money but not any better. Bitter pill to swallow on its own.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,319
And1: 20,913
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: [Woj] Horford, Ferg, 1st, 2nd for Danny Green 

Post#58 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:56 pm

Small scale, but giving #34 versus #36 could be annoying.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#59 » by Whole Truth » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:56 pm

.
GutUNC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,890
And1: 2,072
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
         

Re: [Woj] Horford, 1st, 2nd for Da Green 

Post#60 » by GutUNC » Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:57 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:This doesn't really make Philly better or not much. I'm underwhelmed for them. It's perfectly fine value wise but doesn't feel like it really addresses the root of their issues. More to come I guess?


They added 2 shooters and got rid of 1 of their 2 starting centers. I mean, it's certainly not the magic wand that makes them contenders or anything, but how does it not address their needs (particularly with adding salary flexibility starting next year.

I think the value is good both ways as well. Definitely proves wrong the people who swore it would take at least 2 1sts just to get off Horford's deal.
GDTBATH

Return to Trades and Transactions