If they could have, they would have.Saul Goodman wrote:I feel like they missed boat on trading him at the deadline last year. If Marcus Morris got a 1st Rose surely could have gotten one.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

If they could have, they would have.Saul Goodman wrote:I feel like they missed boat on trading him at the deadline last year. If Marcus Morris got a 1st Rose surely could have gotten one.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
tobysunsfan wrote:Saul Goodman wrote:I feel like they missed boat on trading him at the deadline last year. If Marcus Morris got a 1st Rose surely could have gotten one.
100%
And I don't get this from the Knicks perspective, this is just going take minutes from their young player (especially Quickley). They should be trading away their senior players not getting more, are they going to sacrifice development to get knocked out in 4 games by whoever is the 1st seed.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
VCfor3 wrote:At least Detroit can sell it as getting a former lottery pick in Smith along with the 2nd. I'm not sure there is truly a much better return than this out there so Detroit seems to have made the best out of a bad situation.
Personally I think Detroit should have tried to add a little extra value and get Robinson instead. They could use a center to balance out their roster.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

cgf wrote:VCfor3 wrote:At least Detroit can sell it as getting a former lottery pick in Smith along with the 2nd. I'm not sure there is truly a much better return than this out there so Detroit seems to have made the best out of a bad situation.
Personally I think Detroit should have tried to add a little extra value and get Robinson instead. They could use a center to balance out their roster.
It never hurts to try, I guess...but what on earth makes you think the Knicks would've parted with Robinson in any Rose-trade?
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold Rose ever had 1st round value, so I cannot fault Detroit for getting a mid 2nd.
VCfor3 wrote:cgf wrote:VCfor3 wrote:At least Detroit can sell it as getting a former lottery pick in Smith along with the 2nd. I'm not sure there is truly a much better return than this out there so Detroit seems to have made the best out of a bad situation.
Personally I think Detroit should have tried to add a little extra value and get Robinson instead. They could use a center to balance out their roster.
It never hurts to try, I guess...but what on earth makes you think the Knicks would've parted with Robinson in any Rose-trade?
I'm just messing around. Detroit shouldn't offer enough for it to be worth it for the Knicks given their roster.
Return to Trades and Transactions