[WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Who won?

Milwaukee
21
22%
Houston
50
52%
Neither
7
7%
Both
19
20%
 
Total votes: 97

Phobo_Phile
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,748
And1: 403
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#41 » by Phobo_Phile » Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:56 pm

I don't think I can add more than what I already see here. This is a great return for the Rockets and definitely the best out of the recent fad of "we've mutually agreed to part ways." Add onto it that PJ Tucker has looked totally washed this year. The Bucks seem to be reeking of desperation.

Sent from my moto g(7) using RealGM mobile app
kingcong95
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 129
Joined: Nov 10, 2019
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#42 » by kingcong95 » Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:57 pm

Catchall wrote:I actually like Kurucs as a sneaky pickup for Milwaukee in this deal. However, I think PJ Tucker may be running on empty at this point, and I don't see why the Bucks would make their 2023 pick unprotected. Also, I thought Augustin was an important rotation player for them.


The key to the deal for Houston was probably to swap their early 2nd for a late 1st this year, which is probably better value than the late 2nds other teams were offering. Per Stepien rule, in order to do that, the Bucks needed to get their 2022 1st back, which is why they gave the Rockets their 2023 1st.

I do wonder what the Bucks plan to do about backup PG. This deal leaves them with 13 players on the roster, and they have hard cap room to sign two rest-of-season deal. Perhaps they can create more flexibility if they find another team to take Kurucs, but completely getting out of the tax is a longshot. I think he was only required to make the numbers match up since he couldn't get off the bench for the Rockets until all their guys started going down.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,872
And1: 25,193
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#43 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:04 am

I like that GMs are using more of the creativity available to them in deals like this. I would’ve liked this better without the 21 swap action because MIL could’ve used the 21 first for another upgrade. They can still do so with the Rockets 2nd, but doesn’t necessarily carry the same sticker value as being able to trade their 1st
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,872
And1: 25,193
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#44 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:06 am

I don’t mean to pile on but where would Milwaukee be right now if they’d traded for Chris Paul? A lot of those he’s not needed he’s old etc comments look very bad at the moment.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,170
And1: 11,969
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#45 » by eminence » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:07 am

Think this helps the Bucks try to win this season and solid value for the Rockets. Win win in my book, Bucks obviously taking on more risk, as I'm not sure PJ returning to form is a given.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,631
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#46 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:10 am

eminence wrote:Think this helps the Bucks try to win this season and solid value for the Rockets. Win win in my book, Bucks obviously taking on more risk, as I'm not sure PJ returning to form is a given.
Same. I am biased but I think the rockets won a little more if I had to chose, but I don't think Milwaukee did too bad. A lot of people were being unrealisticly low on what tuck would return on this board
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,763
And1: 44,021
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#47 » by zimpy27 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:12 am

skones wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
loserX wrote:(At quick glance, this also gets the Bucks out of the tax.)


So that's a benefit that I missed but I still don't like. Augustin has been decent enough and he's signed for a few years which for a team with as little flexibility as the Bucks strikes me as a good thing. The first round swap this year is a little much for Tucker for my taste especially since you're not just sending back useless expirings.



Augustin has been legitimately awful, has a NG'd third year, and no this doesn't get us out of the tax.


Giannis, Jrue, DDV had their best 2-man lineups with Augustin. He's a good fit to start with Jrue or be a backup with DDV. Augustin looked terrible with Bryn and BroLo, both of these guys should've been traded for a PG.

I do think Tucker is an ideal fit for the Bucks though so it's still a neutral trade IMO.

Anyway, who do you think the Bucks trade BroLo for? Hill? Rubio?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,769
And1: 99,314
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#48 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:17 am

RipPizzaGuy wrote:So to be clear here the picks as it sits today is #26 for #33. Then they pushed the 22 pick to 23? I had Augustine as awful money.

7 spots as of today and pushing a pick back 1 year for Tucker and Kuruks? I woulda asked for House, but this is the kind of shifty move a team like Milwaukee needed to make to improve the front court. Watch out for the Tucker resurgence.


And with Craig portion, totally out of the tax right?

I have this as a definite win for the Bucks.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Sparkey67
Ballboy
Posts: 17
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 01, 2015

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#49 » by Sparkey67 » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:26 am

The early second round picks are more valuable than the last 6 picks of the 1st rd because there is no guaranteed contract tied to 2nd round picks.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#50 » by Stillwater » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:27 am

seems as if Bucks are all in this season lol good luck
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Vae Victus
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,139
And1: 1,934
Joined: Jun 09, 2013

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#51 » by Vae Victus » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:29 am

kingcong95 wrote:I do wonder what the Bucks plan to do about backup PG. This deal leaves them with 13 players on the roster, and they have hard cap room to sign two rest-of-season deal. Perhaps they can create more flexibility if they find another team to take Kurucs, but completely getting out of the tax is a longshot. I think he was only required to make the numbers match up since he couldn't get off the bench for the Rockets until all their guys started going down.


I think Lin is a great option for MIL to pickup to fill in for Agustin's spot.

Lin's bigger (same size as Forbes), can plakymake, good locker room soldier, and appears to be healthy. He had a great GLeague bubble showing, where he played very well, shooting extremely well, and under control. As s backup 10-15 min vet PG, you could do alot worse. It never made any sense to sign someone like DJ Augustin to real money when you can get vet min pickups like Lin.

Also Lin is desperate for a NBA return, he'd prolly be willing to sign a 10day or 2way deal, and if a better option shows up on the buyout market MIL can dump Lin and go pick up that player.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,445
And1: 3,072
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#52 » by BoogieTime » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:32 am

Milwaukee’s unprotected is still the best thing on here. Anything can happen
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#53 » by Ruzious » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:36 am

I almost get the feeling Milwaukee wanted it to be so confusing so that nobody could tell for sure if it was bad or good.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#54 » by Ruzious » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:36 am

BoogieTime wrote:Milwaukee’s unprotected is still the best thing on here. Anything can happen

2022 or 2023?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#55 » by youngcrev » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:36 am

I don't hate it for the Bucks. I get that there's more uncertainty which a pick 2 years from now rather than 1 (which is why I like it for the Rockets), but this actually gives them the ability to trade that '21 pick now if they have something else in mind (not that I expect them to) and gets them out of the tax.

Oh, and then the obvious, PJ Tucker, who gives them a matchup piece and small ball 5 option. He was going to be a good add for any playoff team, plus this keeps him off the Nets and Sixers.

Edit: I clearly misread the part about the '21 swap and thought they were just giving them a 2nd. Feels a little more iffy. Great deal for the Rockets.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#56 » by Ruzious » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:38 am

youngcrev wrote:I don't hate it for the Bucks. I get that there's more uncertainty which a pick 2 years from now rather than 1 (which is why I like it for the Rockets), but this actually gives them the ability to trade that '21 pick now if they have something else in mind (not that I expect them to) and gets them out of the tax.

Oh, and then the obvious, PJ Tucker, who gives them a matchup piece and small ball 5 option. He was going to be a good add for any playoff team, plus this keeps him off the Nets and Sixers.

Except Tucker doesn't appear to be even half the player he used to be.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#57 » by BullyKing » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:39 am

Sparkey67 wrote:The early second round picks are more valuable than the last 6 picks of the 1st rd because there is no guaranteed contract tied to 2nd round picks.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk


Oh god not this debate again. No, a first is always worth more than a second. You have a wider selection of players and its very rare that the (two year only) guaranteed contract is negative.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,977
And1: 16,440
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#58 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:39 am

Giving up any unprotected 1st for Tucker seems like insanity, what if Giannis misses the year
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,445
And1: 3,072
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#59 » by BoogieTime » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:47 am

Ruzious wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:Milwaukee’s unprotected is still the best thing on here. Anything can happen

2022 or 2023?

I misread the trade..
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,101
And1: 15,166
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: [WOJ] PJ Tucker to MIL 

Post#60 » by Laimbeer » Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:49 am

Pj is a 35 year old rental role player who looks washed. Wow.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy

Return to Trades and Transactions