Texas Chuck wrote:I think they are all amazing young players every team would want to have at whatever price their existing team wanted to name.
More seriously I think that if a team got to move out some unwanted money each of them could return an asset, but if you asked a team to take on the whole deal, Simons is the only one of these guys I feel good about teams being willing to do so.
Because on court, the play isn't justifying the contract for the other two currently and young doesn't necessarily mean there is another level especially when we aren't seeing meaningful growth or increased impact. It's one thing to take a chance on a young player who is cheap. It's another when a guy is being paid as a proven good starter and they are still a drag on the team.
And what I find interesting is how easy it is for most posters to see that when the player is not currently on their team. I always wonder why they think their team is an exception and don't consider that perhaps their attachment is affecting their evaluation, instead of accusing neutral fans of bias, not watching the games, creating narratives, etc....
Not me. I voted for them all as having positive value. You may not agree with my opinions but at least I try to be consistent with them.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential
and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
