nzahir wrote:If we had Ayton in the Minny series, we should have won it
Think what you want.
Teams 3-7 werent too far apart from each other, more of a matchup thing
Exactly. The Lakers finished at the top of their expected W/L. That's my point.
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
nzahir wrote:If we had Ayton in the Minny series, we should have won it
Teams 3-7 werent too far apart from each other, more of a matchup thing
zimpy27 wrote:tobysunsfan wrote:Karmaloop wrote:Just looking at the current Lakers' roster as currently constructed.
PG: Luka Doncic / Gabe Vincent / Bronny James
SG: Austin Reaves / Shake Milton / Jordan Goodwin
SF: LeBron James / Jake LaRavia / Dalton Knecht
PF: Rui Hachimura / Jarred Vanderbilt / Maxi Kleber
C: DeAndre Ayton
Clearly, the Lakers could use more size so I'd guess they probably are short one more big man. I think they're going to shop their expiring (Vincent, Milton, and Kleber) for whatever useful vet they can get that has a 2nd year on their contract. I think their ideal target would be Andrew Wiggins, but if the Heat continue to insist on Dalton Knecht or a FRP in return for him, they'll pivot elsewhere. Ideally, I think they're looking for a wing defender preferably one with a reliable jump shot. I could see them pivoting to someone like John Collins, but I can't imagine they'd give up much more than a SRP to acquire him. After that, I'd venture a guess they'll just go veteran minimum shopping. Guys like Melton, CP3, etc. will probably be discussed.
That roster is dire, not a single great defender there.
There's a reason Ayton was bought out, and he provides nothing the Lakers actually need. He can't defend and he doesn't space the floor.
Grayson would be a good get, he'd fit the starting group.
tobysunsfan wrote:Karmaloop wrote:Just looking at the current Lakers' roster as currently constructed.
PG: Luka Doncic / Gabe Vincent / Bronny James
SG: Austin Reaves / Shake Milton / Jordan Goodwin
SF: LeBron James / Jake LaRavia / Dalton Knecht
PF: Rui Hachimura / Jarred Vanderbilt / Maxi Kleber
C: DeAndre Ayton
Clearly, the Lakers could use more size so I'd guess they probably are short one more big man. I think they're going to shop their expiring (Vincent, Milton, and Kleber) for whatever useful vet they can get that has a 2nd year on their contract. I think their ideal target would be Andrew Wiggins, but if the Heat continue to insist on Dalton Knecht or a FRP in return for him, they'll pivot elsewhere. Ideally, I think they're looking for a wing defender preferably one with a reliable jump shot. I could see them pivoting to someone like John Collins, but I can't imagine they'd give up much more than a SRP to acquire him. After that, I'd venture a guess they'll just go veteran minimum shopping. Guys like Melton, CP3, etc. will probably be discussed.
That roster is dire, not a single great defender there.
There's a reason Ayton was bought out, and he provides nothing the Lakers actually need. He can't defend and he doesn't space the floor.
ReggiesKnicks wrote:kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Trading lebron seems like wasting a year of Luka to me. Lakers ended 3rd last season . Don't see why they couldn't win more if they go all on a wing defender.
Smart , KCP, Wiggins would be my targets. See what team stumbles and make trade into the season if no targets avaialbe.
Lakers also massively overachieved their point differential and clearly weren't the 3rd best team in the West.
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Trading lebron seems like wasting a year of Luka to me. Lakers ended 3rd last season . Don't see why they couldn't win more if they go all on a wing defender.
Smart , KCP, Wiggins would be my targets. See what team stumbles and make trade into the season if no targets avaialbe.
Lakers also massively overachieved their point differential and clearly weren't the 3rd best team in the West.
They won 50 games. Rockets won 52. I don’t see the logic lol

eric365 wrote:It make no sens for Luka to sign an extension
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

Karmaloop wrote:penbeast0 wrote:The problem is what does LA do to fit his salary in; I'd trade him into a TPE for a 2nd. But if we are swapping expirings, then it either has to be another good defense high character guy. If he's salary ballast for taking on someone less valuable then there has to be compensation for that. That's why I said to the guy who said bring in Smart to make an offer. I don't really see anything there that works well.
I mean, Vincent plus Kleber works pretty much straight up for Smart. Wiz add an additional 913k on their salary, but that's pretty insignificant and probably could be covered with cash if they wanted/needed. If Wiz want something back involving Smart, it's going to need to be them taking back long-term money. So a team could acquire Vincent and/or Kleber, and the 3rd team sends a bad contract and pick(s) back to Washington.

penbeast0 wrote:Even a 2nd is something, and possibly enough. If I'm the team, Smart doesn't see the court much behind all the other guards we have and I use McCollum and Middleton as my vet mentors so the only issue would be whether Vincent has a good attitude about not being in the rotation without injuries or another trade. Can always cut one of them if needed too; we weren't going to resign Smart that I know of.

Texas Chuck wrote:eric365 wrote:It make no sens for Luka to sign an extension
I mean guaranteeing yourself 9 figures makes quite a bit of sense. It's why star players sign long-term extensions as opposed to just continually doing 1+PO deals. It's protection against injury. Otherwise they would only do one year at a time deals to maintain leverage.
I suspect he signs regardless of what the roster looks like come August 2nd. But if he doesn't next off-season will certainly have a big prize teams will be pursuing.

ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

Vae Victus wrote:Thinking about it more. The Lakers really screwed up in not giving DFS a 3rd year, or at least a player option (outside chance he'd opt out) for the 3rd year. Satisfies his objective of securing the biggest bag he can get and Lakers retain a solid 3D player. Ayton i feel woulda just signed for the TPMLE 1+1 as his fit on the Lakers is still the best among all of his suitors, it'll cost him a coupla mil for this upcoming season but can easily be made up with a good year. After that, forget the 2027 cap space plan, just trade Kleber+Vincent or even Rui if needed, for the best player on a multi year deal that other teams are looking to dump. Wiggins would be ideal and id happily throw in a SRP and cash to make it happen. Then wait for buyouts like John Collins and other disgruntled vets stuck on tanking squads. I'd also keep exploring an Austin Reaves trade for a better fitting partner for Luka, dont want to be forced to pay him 27+ mil when the time comes, he's basically the perfect 6th man, but as a 3rd option his lack of defense is killer.
At best Laravia can easily provide a bit more offensive versatility than DFS, but defensively... yea...
nate33 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:eric365 wrote:It make no sens for Luka to sign an extension
I mean guaranteeing yourself 9 figures makes quite a bit of sense. It's why star players sign long-term extensions as opposed to just continually doing 1+PO deals. It's protection against injury. Otherwise they would only do one year at a time deals to maintain leverage.
I suspect he signs regardless of what the roster looks like come August 2nd. But if he doesn't next off-season will certainly have a big prize teams will be pursuing.
I'd say Doncic is in the echelon where even if he has a nasty season-ending injury this year, he would still get the max on his next contract. He doesn't really have that much incentive to extend early.
After all, he may be waiting around until next Summer when my Wizards extend him an offer.
ReggiesKnicks wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:I think LBJ wants one more run at a title. IDK if that happens with this laker roster.
Titles are typically won by having a Top 5 player in the NBA, and LeBron currently shares the court with a Top 5 player in the NBA. I doubt he wants to be traded.
OKC, Denver, and Milwaukee can't or won't trade for LeBron.
basketballwacko2 wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:I think LBJ wants one more run at a title. IDK if that happens with this laker roster.
Titles are typically won by having a Top 5 player in the NBA, and LeBron currently shares the court with a Top 5 player in the NBA. I doubt he wants to be traded.
OKC, Denver, and Milwaukee can't or won't trade for LeBron.
That's the issue for him and the lakers. I don't think they will put together a good enough team to get past Denver, OKC or Houston. The got beat in the first round in 2025. A lot will depend on health but I have to think OKC is the favorite to win the West again.
The contender teams don't have the pieces either to match salary or to give the Lakers picks.
IF he stays in LA which is most likely and they don't win the title I think he goes UFA and signs with Cleveland as a free agent in 2026-27 for a small amount and then retires.
Return to Trades and Transactions