Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 9,245
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#561 » by stormi » Sat Aug 21, 2021 7:23 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
3 hours ago – via Marc Stein @ marcstein.substack.com
After 25 seasons in charge, 22 trips to the playoffs and those five titles, Popovich will naturally leave his post how and whenever he chooses. He has earned that right. Chances are we won’t hear from him on any topic until training camp begins, but it’s fair to say — with less than 40 days until camps open leaguewide — that there is far more chatter circulating about the Spurs’ attempts to barge their way into the Ben Simmons trade sweepstakes than Pop’s future.


Hmm...


I think Spurs are in best position to get Simmons. All the other teams are trying to hold on to other pieces to get Simmons to fit. Spurs would effectively build with Ben as the core piece and they already went out to get the shooters. They have more to give than other teams


You've been beating on this drum for a while :p

Just google "Pop Ben Simmons" or other variations and you can see countless examples of him lauding his talent. He clearly loves him, and as a Simmons fan in general I would love to see him go and work with Pop. He would turn him into a monster.
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,942
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#562 » by DoItALL9 » Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:36 pm

Simmons for Hield, Bagley, and an unprotected first round pick

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app
SCTwins
Rookie
Posts: 1,004
And1: 884
Joined: Jun 22, 2018
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#563 » by SCTwins » Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:38 pm

GoBobs wrote:Wolves out: Pat Bev, Prince, A Edwards, 2 swaps 1 lightly protected pick
Wolves in: Simmons, Bouknight

Wolves get Simmons using Edwards but get Bouknight as a replacement 2 guard

Hornets out: Hayward, Bouknight, 1st round pick from Pelicans
Hornets in: Edwards, Prince, Pat Bev

Hornets upgrade from Bouknight to Edwards

Cavs out: Sexton
Cavs in: Wolves pick swap, lightly protected wolves pick

Cavs punt on Sexton

76ers out: Simmons
76ers in: Sexton, Hayward, wolves pick swap, pelicans first round pick

76ers get a package with a few pick assets and two players that can help win now for Simmons


You can't even be serious. Why don't we throw KAT in there too?

Edwards and THREE picks? You're out of your mind.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,776
And1: 44,036
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#564 » by zimpy27 » Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:57 pm

stormi wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
Hmm...


I think Spurs are in best position to get Simmons. All the other teams are trying to hold on to other pieces to get Simmons to fit. Spurs would effectively build with Ben as the core piece and they already went out to get the shooters. They have more to give than other teams


You've been beating on this drum for a while :p

Just google "Pop Ben Simmons" or other variations and you can see countless examples of him lauding his talent. He clearly loves him, and as a Simmons fan in general I would love to see him go and work with Pop. He would turn him into a monster.



Haha yeah I can't help but see the potential fit for both sides. I also think Spurs would be very good for Ben.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#565 » by DWhiteMamba » Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:29 pm

The most realistic rumour I've heard about the Spurs is that they were willing to engage around a deal based on Dejounte and Lonny. That is realistic, because there's no effing way the Spurs are giving up White or Keldon to get damaged goods like Simmons. Nor are they going to throw in a tonne of draft capital. The Spurs don't make stupid trades like that. I could see them trading Lonny, Dejounte & a few moderately protected picks because that makes sense. Anything more than that does not. Simmons is a very tricky player to fit around; he's basically your center for most of the time he is on the court. He's a better version of Dejounte Murray, but not so much better we should be tripping over ourselves to get him. He has more defensive versatility than Murray, and is a better passer and playmaker. On the other hand Dejounte has a good midrange game and an improving 3pt game. Dejounte could easily come into next season and shoot 350 from the 3 on 5 attempts a game and make this trade look crazy. Lonny could come in and have a good start to the season and look great, whereas Simmons value might be even lower.

Simmons is a good player, if you can get him at a reasonable price you do it, but Morey is obviously being ridiculous at this point.
User avatar
Scalabrine
RealGM
Posts: 18,329
And1: 8,142
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Location: NorCal
     

Pistons/Wolves/Sixers/Cavs Blockbuster That Has Simmons in Minny 

Post#566 » by Scalabrine » Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:39 pm

I really think that Ben Simmons in Minnesota with KAT/D'Lo/Antman is the absolute perfect for both parties (outside of Simmons probably wanting to be in a bigger market). This is a big one but I feel like it gets everyone what they want.

Wolves trade:
Malik Beasley,Taurean Prince,Jake Layman 22 FRP, 23 FRP Swap, 24 FRP, 25 FRP swap, 26 FRP, 22 SRP, 22 SRP (via Washington)
Wolves get:
Ben Simmons, Seth Curry,

Sixers trade:
Ben Simmons, Seth Curry, Shake Milton
Sixers get:
Jerami Grant, Colin Sexton, Ricky Rubio

Pistons trade:
Jerami Grant
Pistons get:
Taurean Prince, Jake Layman, 22 FRP, 22 SRP, 25 Pick Swap (all from MIN)

Cavs trade:
Colin Sexton, Ricky Rubio
Cavs get: Malik Beasley, Patrick Beverly, Shake Milton, 23 FRP swap, 24 FRP, 2 2 SRP via Washington (all from MIN)

Wolves Depth Chart
KAT/Reid/Vanderbildt
Simmons/McDaniels
Layman/Bolmaro
Edwards/Curry
Russell/McLoughlin

Sixers Depth Chart
Embiid/Drummond
Harris/Niang/Tolliver
Grant/Thybulle/Korkmaz
Sexton/Green/Milton
Rubio/Maxey/Springer

Pistons Depth Chart
Stewart/Olynyk/Okafor
Prince/Lyles/Doumbouya
Bey/Jackson/McGruder
Hayes/Okogi//Diallo
Cunningham/Lee/Jackson

Cavs Depth Chart
Allen/Nance
Mobley/Wade
Okoro/Osman/Dotson
Beasley/Beverly/Windler
Garland/Milton
*Love (not sure what the plan is for him)
Go Knicks!
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#567 » by DWhiteMamba » Sat Aug 21, 2021 11:17 pm

When you say someone is "the perfect fit" next to XYZ because player XYZ covers the other guys weaknesses, you're also saying "player XYZ would be better if he played with a guy who he didn't need to cover for the weakness of". Ok, Towns helps limit Simmons weaknesses... but if Towns played with a guy who didn't have Simmons weaknesses he'd be even better. Teams should never make trades like this which prevent their players from being fully actualised. It doesn't work well.

If the Wolves can get Simmons for reasonable value then go for it I guess, but they'd be better served putting Towns next to guys who enhance him when they're ready to become contenders. I'm not sure Simmons is a guy you want as a contender, but I guess the Wolves and Spurs don't have that problem right now.
cool93
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#568 » by cool93 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:33 am

zimpy27 wrote:
cool93 wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
No team outside California will give up a top asset for Simmons because of his comments.

I think Spurs win this unless the Kings give up a good package.
Can you give a link to his comments, please?

Sent from my G3416 using RealGM mobile app


They were reported by a guy named Jason Dumars who used to work for 76ers as a beat writer and who reported the Rivers signing in Philly first. I cant remember if he wrote it or stated it on a program. But that should be enough info for you to go by to find it.


So you are talking about a reporter from SAN FRANCISCO who reported that Ben wants to be traded GSW. Gotcha :D
cool93
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#569 » by cool93 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:37 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:The most realistic rumour I've heard about the Spurs is that they were willing to engage around a deal based on Dejounte and Lonny. That is realistic, because there's no effing way the Spurs are giving up White or Keldon to get damaged goods like Simmons. Nor are they going to throw in a tonne of draft capital. The Spurs don't make stupid trades like that. I could see them trading Lonny, Dejounte & a few moderately protected picks because that makes sense. Anything more than that does not. Simmons is a very tricky player to fit around; he's basically your center for most of the time he is on the court. He's a better version of Dejounte Murray, but not so much better we should be tripping over ourselves to get him. He has more defensive versatility than Murray, and is a better passer and playmaker. On the other hand Dejounte has a good midrange game and an improving 3pt game. Dejounte could easily come into next season and shoot 350 from the 3 on 5 attempts a game and make this trade look crazy. Lonny could come in and have a good start to the season and look great, whereas Simmons value might be even lower.

Simmons is a good player, if you can get him at a reasonable price you do it, but Morey is obviously being ridiculous at this point.


And what exactly is the point for Sixers to trade Ben for "worse version of him" if all they get for it is **** Lonnie Walker?
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#570 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:49 am

Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 9,245
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#571 » by stormi » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:21 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,792
And1: 23,341
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#572 » by Bornstellar » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:25 am

stormi wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.


They never offered Ingram nor did they have the #4 pick to include at that time so no it wasn't the same package. Get your facts straight
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 9,245
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#573 » by stormi » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:28 am

Bornstellar wrote:
stormi wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.


They never offered Ingram nor did they have the #4 pick to include at that time so no it wasn't the same package. Get your facts straight


I mean you can pull that card, but the difference is that the Pels scalped the Lakers for everything, because they knew they were desperate.

The Spurs didn't even try to extort more assets. They didn't negotiate with the Lakers, they never intended to deal him there. Pop&co chose being petty over taking the best package possible. And Kawhi still went and got his chip. Egg on face in San An.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,792
And1: 23,341
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#574 » by Bornstellar » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:36 am

stormi wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
stormi wrote:
The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.


They never offered Ingram nor did they have the #4 pick to include at that time so no it wasn't the same package. Get your facts straight


I mean you can pull that card, but the difference is that the Pels scalped the Lakers for everything, because they knew they were desperate.

The Spurs didn't even try to extort more assets. They didn't negotiate with the Lakers, they never intended to deal him there. Pop&co chose being petty over taking the best package possible. And Kawhi still went and got his chip. Egg on face in San An.


Really? And tell me, how has this awesome trade package worked our for the Pels?
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 9,245
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#575 » by stormi » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:44 am

Bornstellar wrote:
stormi wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
They never offered Ingram nor did they have the #4 pick to include at that time so no it wasn't the same package. Get your facts straight


I mean you can pull that card, but the difference is that the Pels scalped the Lakers for everything, because they knew they were desperate.

The Spurs didn't even try to extort more assets. They didn't negotiate with the Lakers, they never intended to deal him there. Pop&co chose being petty over taking the best package possible. And Kawhi still went and got his chip. Egg on face in San An.


Really? And tell me, how has this awesome trade package worked our for the Pels?


Ignoring the massive draft capital surplus and Lonzo/Hart . They got Brandon Ingram. A 23 year old allstar worth more than your franchises assets combined.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,792
And1: 23,341
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#576 » by Bornstellar » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:47 am

stormi wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
stormi wrote:
I mean you can pull that card, but the difference is that the Pels scalped the Lakers for everything, because they knew they were desperate.

The Spurs didn't even try to extort more assets. They didn't negotiate with the Lakers, they never intended to deal him there. Pop&co chose being petty over taking the best package possible. And Kawhi still went and got his chip. Egg on face in San An.


Really? And tell me, how has this awesome trade package worked our for the Pels?


Ignoring the massive draft capital surplus and Lonzo/Hart . They got Brandon Ingram. A 23 year old allstar worth more than your franchises assets combined.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#577 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 2:57 am

stormi wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.

This is a myth that gets put out there by people for one reason or another. It has no basis in reality. LA's own imbedded reporters with inside sources were reporting a few weeks before the trade happened that Ingram still wasn't in the deal, and that the Lakers wanted Dejounte Murray back too. Magic Johnson was a horrible negotiator, and it's not a coincidence that the AD trade happened after Magic was gone. Magic's refusal to be serious in previous negotiations for trades for players like Kawhi and George was a lesson his successor didn't repeat. The reported deal put out there involved Kuzma, Ball, Hart and 2 bad 1sts. It was nothing like the godfather offers for AD and Kawhi. The very reason the Lakers were willing to make a godfather offer for Davis was because they had been burned from past mishandling of trade negotiations and came correct to the Davis trade.

Tim Bontemps, a very credible journalist with real sources, came out and did a pod right after the trade in which he made it clear the DeRozan trade was about the best they could get. He outlined some of the other trades on the table, and how they were no better (or worse) and opined that he didn't know what else the Spurs could have done to salvage the situation, that Kawhi was just determined to force his way out no matter what and that "this was just the way it was going to be" no matter what they did. Anyone who says "why didn't they get OG or Siakim" or whatever should go listen to the realgm pod Bontemps did, where he basically tells Danny Leroux why he is wrong in excruciating detail.

But let's say for the sake of argument the Spurs could have gotten Ingram. There was no indication at the time Ingram would improve to become the player he became, his shooting % made almost unheard of leaps, and there still to this day is doubt about whether Ingram even helps you win. He puts up stats, but so does DeRozan, and I saw how empty those stats often were for 3 years. It remains open whether Ingram is a winning player. He plays no D for one thing, and posts numbers on a bad team.
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,844
And1: 9,245
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#578 » by stormi » Sun Aug 22, 2021 3:57 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:
stormi wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


The Spurs could have gotten a better package though. The Lakers offered the AD haul for Leonard and Pop and Spurs higher ups decided to prioritize 'sticking' it to Kawhi as opposed to doing what was justifiably obvious for the future of their franchise. They said 'you want Cali? you'll go the furthest place from there'. And even then they didn't walk out of it with Siakam or OG or decent draft capital.

One of the worst trades of all time imo.

This is a myth that gets put out there by people for one reason or another. It has no basis in reality. LA's own imbedded reporters with inside sources were reporting a few weeks before the trade happened that Ingram still wasn't in the deal, and that the Lakers wanted Dejounte Murray back too. Magic Johnson was a horrible negotiator, and it's not a coincidence that the AD trade happened after Magic was gone. Magic's refusal to be serious in previous negotiations for trades for players like Kawhi and George was a lesson his successor didn't repeat. The reported deal put out there involved Kuzma, Ball, Hart and 2 bad 1sts. It was nothing like the godfather offers for AD and Kawhi. The very reason the Lakers were willing to make a godfather offer for Davis was because they had been burned from past mishandling of trade negotiations and came correct to the Davis trade.

Tim Bontemps, a very credible journalist with real sources, came out and did a pod right after the trade in which he made it clear the DeRozan trade was about the best they could get. He outlined some of the other trades on the table, and how they were no better (or worse) and opined that he didn't know what else the Spurs could have done to salvage the situation, that Kawhi was just determined to force his way out no matter what and that "this was just the way it was going to be" no matter what they did. Anyone who says "why didn't they get OG or Siakim" or whatever should go listen to the realgm pod Bontemps did, where he basically tells Danny Leroux why he is wrong in excruciating detail.

But let's say for the sake of argument the Spurs could have gotten Ingram. There was no indication at the time Ingram would improve to become the player he became, his shooting % made almost unheard of leaps, and there still to this day is doubt about whether Ingram even helps you win. He puts up stats, but so does DeRozan, and I saw how empty those stats often were for 3 years. It remains open whether Ingram is a winning player. He plays no D for one thing, and posts numbers on a bad team.


This long winded copium of a response would only hold weight if the Spurs went on to get an actual good deal elsewhere. They got fleeced even worse by the Raptors.

Excessive draft capital? nope

Star potential prospect? nope

Near 30 year old empty stat merchant? yup

The return for a 26 year old with a ridiculous resume to that point including 2 DPOY's a (fraudulent) FMVP, multiple allstar berths and All NBA nods - that was the best player on two 60 win teams was... Poeltl, Demar and ONE PROTECTED frp. Just really really bad.

But also karma I guess for the way the organization and Tony Parker led that witch-hunt against a player that was genuinely battling injury crisis.

It's not Billy King levels of bad, but this one will go down as one of the worst trades of the modern era.
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#579 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 4:35 am

stormi wrote:
This long winded copium of a response would only hold weight if the Spurs went on to get an actual good deal elsewhere. They got fleeced even worse by the Raptors.

Excessive draft capital? nope

Star potential prospect? nope

Near 30 year old empty stat merchant? yup

The return for a 26 year old with a ridiculous resume to that point including 2 DPOY's a (fraudulent) FMVP, multiple allstar berths and All NBA nods - that was the best player on two 60 win teams was... Poeltl, Demar and ONE PROTECTED frp. Just really really bad.

But also karma I guess for the way the organization and Tony Parker led that witch-hunt against a player that was genuinely battling injury crisis.

It's not Billy King levels of bad, but this one will go down as one of the worst trades of the modern era.


To complain that the Spurs didn't get a "good deal" is meaningless unless you're judging it against what was actually out there. I will elaborate on that in a second, but first let's look at the actual context that you completely ignore when describing Kawhi as an all-star, DPOY, etc.

Kawhi was dead-set on leaving to LA. In the lead-up to the season he had ceased all communication with the Spurs. When the Spurs sent doctors and officials to check on him his handlers literally ushered him into another room until they left and refused to let them speak with him. Kawhi then milked an injury to sit out until he was traded (more on that in a second). Kawhi's uncle Dennis during this time was leaking story after story about how Kawhi wanted a trade to the Lakers, while Kawhi continued to refuse to return calls to the Spurs front office. Kawhi and his uncle fired his previous agent (who is winning a lawsuit against them for owing him money) because he was not on board with the plan to force a trade. The lid was kept on all this because the Spurs front office doesn't let stuff out easily, and they have a very supportive local media. Kawhi was not more hurt in 2018 than he was on the Raptors and Clippers. The diagnosis the Spurs gave him, of a degenerative condition that he would need to load manage moving forward, was proven correct which is why both the Raptors and Clippers load managed him. Kawhi needed to go to 7 other doctors before he found one who would give him a different diagnosis, and that diagnosis has been proven wrong. Kawhi needs load managing moving forward, which the Spurs were happy to provide. They basically invented load management.

Kawhi refused to even work out with his team mates. He was killing it in private workouts, where it was obvious to all he could play, but refusing to let the Spurs either activate him for the roster, or rule him out for the season. His team mates, understandably annoyed, finally had a team meeting with him to ask him what was going on. During it Kawhi told them "I'll do anything for you guys, but not for this organisation". Kawhi then left the locker room, got on a plane, and flew to LA. That was the last time he was ever in San Antonio while under contract. He did not ask the teams permission to leave, he just left, and the Spurs had to roll with it. In the offseason Kawhi continued to refuse to meet the Spurs management, despite being under contract, and his uncle continued to leak his demands for a trade to LA. His Uncle had also made alot of other ridiculous demands, of much the same sort as the Raptors confirmed he had made before leaving in free agency (such as illegal shares in the team, jobs for all his family, etc, to even consider staying). Kawhi wanted us to pay J.Simmons $50 million dollars for eg, and to give his Uncle GM powers, during his time here (the first point should give you an idea of how bad the second idea would have been). Finally, the Spurs told him they were not even going to entertain a trade until he met with them. The meeting lasted less than 10 minutes, and Kawhi finally told them to their faces that he was set on a trade to LA.

So that's the context. Kawhi and his uncle were determined he would go to LA. He was willing to milk and injury to stay off the court to get said trade, and he refused to talk to non-LA teams. After Toronto traded for him they confirmed he hadn't agreed to talk to them, give them a medical, nothing. Understandably his value was extremely low, because of the above facts. He had to be treated as a rental for 27/29 of the other teams.

So what were the actual offers. Aside from the bad Lakers one I mentioned above, which never even got finalised because the Lakers weren't even negotiating seriously (so sure were they that Kawhi would go there for free in the offseason), here were the offers:
1) The 76ers offered Covington, Saric and the Heat pick. They explicitly refused to include Simmons, Embiid or even Fultz (which sounds ridiculous now, but should tell you where Kawhi's value was).
2) The Clippers offered Tobias Harris and one of their two late lotto picks. Rumour was the Clippers were "entertaining" offering the other one as well.
3) The Celtics by all sources "refused to include any of their 5 best players". Their offer was Marcus Smart (who the Spurs would have needed to pay the max to make the money work because of base year compensation issues), and "some picks". As Bontemps said "given the way the Celtics have carried themselves in this and recent negotiations, you can be pretty sure they weren't very good picks. If this had been an offer of J.Brown and the Kings pick obviously the Spur would have done it". It was speculated the best pick in the deal was the Memphis one. Blerg. The first thing Kawhi asked when he met the Lakers in free agency was "why didn't you trade for me", and Magic told him (and the media to whom he leaked it); cos we're not crazy. The Spurs wanted like 4 picks for you. So Magic himself is admitting there was no godfather offer.

That was it for serious offers. Bontemps was one of many objective journos who confirmed "they would have preferred OG or Pascal, but those guys weren't even on the table" (and this is before they even broke out the following seasons).

The Clippers deal isn't good. While SGA turned into a nice player, that's hindsight bias. The trade was not for SGA, it was for a late lotto pick that had no guarantee of being anything other than a run of the mill meh prospect. It's like us saying "well, we got Keldon, so the deal wasn't so bad". We got the 29th pick. We had no way of knowing it'd turn into Keldon. Harris we'd have lost that offseason, he was massively overpaid, and we wouldn't have been dumb enough to pay him that much. He's only an ok player.

The 76ers offer isn't good. We'd have gotten 1 good role player and a meh pick. The Celtics offer gave us a back-up guard, the position we least needed, on an overly rich contract, and some meh picks. Against that, the Raptors package, as flaws as it was, was actually the best option. Poeltl is a starting big who is fantastic on D. He's worth more than a late lotto pick. We got a 1st thrown in anyway, and we got DDR. I am DDR's harshest critic. I wanted him traded after the 2019 playoffs, but he has his uses and he achieved his purpose in the short term. He helped the team make the playoffs, tying the all-time playoff record, which was important to the Spurs franchise. If not for the Morris debacle in 2020, and White's injury in 2021, the Spurs would still be building that streak; but dem's the breaks. Sometimes the ball doesn't bounce your way. He still gave us a useful if frustrating player, and we managed to turn him into Thad and a good 1st. Overall that is better than anything else being offered; and no amount of waiting would have produced better offers, because Kawhi would just continue to sit with his phantom injury and leak how he wanted a trade to LA and the Spurs would have had another season disrupted by it.

Before Kawhi left to LA so many fans were chirping about how Kawhi would stay with Toronto and the Spurs had done him wrong. The Raptors won the title and treated him well, he would stay for sure. Raptors fans now realise he was never staying. Ever. And other teams weren't offering us much because they knew this too. The guy lost alot of money forcing his way to the Clippers and passing on the super max, etc.
Sportfan73
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,920
And1: 1,320
Joined: Jun 18, 2015
   

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#580 » by Sportfan73 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:12 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.

Ignoring all of the other pointless drama and discussion going on in the last few pages of this thread, why does everything compare the situation to AD, Kawhi, or Harden? Ben has 4 years left on his deal 4 FULL YEARS. He’s not not reporting, he’s not pouting or being a prima donna, he’s not holding out, if they don’t move him he’s coming to camp and he’s playing for the Philadelphia 76ers next year.

Return to Trades and Transactions