Let me try one last way:
If you believe the 3 players you listed are roughly the same, would you like your first or 3rd choice of them?
Do you believe the difference between 3 and 5 is the same as the difference between 21 and 29?
If you do believe that difference to be the same, wouldn't you prefer to have your choice at the top of the draft rather than the bottom?
Do you think a random 2nd has any bearing on any of the above?
Now that's the picks where I will continue to strongly disagree with your valuations. But sounds like now your main point is you want more value for Lauri. I have far less confidence in my ability to know what his value is and if you don't want to trade him for that package, cool.
I just think you are undervaluing the package Utah gets in a meaningful way by how you are valuing the picks.
Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,277
- And1: 98,031
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,887
- And1: 17,397
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
Texas Chuck wrote:Let me try one last way:
If you believe the 3 players you listed are roughly the same, would you like your first or 3rd choice of them?
Do you believe the difference between 3 and 5 is the same as the difference between 21 and 29?
If you do believe that difference to be the same, wouldn't you prefer to have your choice at the top of the draft rather than the bottom?
Do you think a random 2nd has any bearing on any of the above?
Now that's the picks where I will continue to strongly disagree with your valuations. But sounds like now your main point is you want more value for Lauri. I have far less confidence in my ability to know what his value is and if you don't want to trade him for that package, cool.
I just think you are undervaluing the package Utah gets in a meaningful way by how you are valuing the picks.
Plus that 2028 pick has quote a bit of value. Everyone should project their preference in the 3 to 5 range, you have the choice to just take that player regardless of how strong the preference is. E.g. I have a huge preference for Tre Johnson, I assume he won't be there at 5!

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,931
- And1: 3,248
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Lauri + 5 for PG + 3 + future 1st
babyjax13 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Let me try one last way:
If you believe the 3 players you listed are roughly the same, would you like your first or 3rd choice of them?
Do you believe the difference between 3 and 5 is the same as the difference between 21 and 29?
If you do believe that difference to be the same, wouldn't you prefer to have your choice at the top of the draft rather than the bottom?
Do you think a random 2nd has any bearing on any of the above?
Now that's the picks where I will continue to strongly disagree with your valuations. But sounds like now your main point is you want more value for Lauri. I have far less confidence in my ability to know what his value is and if you don't want to trade him for that package, cool.
I just think you are undervaluing the package Utah gets in a meaningful way by how you are valuing the picks.
Plus that 2028 pick has quote a bit of value. Everyone should project their preference in the 3 to 5 range, you have the choice to just take that player regardless of how strong the preference is. E.g. I have a huge preference for Tre Johnson, I assume he won't be there at 5!
Yep. The Utah FO will have their big board and some preference gaps between picks will be larger than others. We each have our own opinions on relative value, but have no idea what the cost tolerance is for the Jazz brass.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Return to Trades and Transactions