ConSarnit wrote:Just run it back. Getting Kawhi is the closest the Raptors can get to a tier 1 star. Swapping Ingram out for a Bane/Murphy type doesn’t move the needle. The price for those guys is probably the same price they paid for Kawhi but you don’t get the upside.
Unless the Raptors can find a deal that makes them an ECF contender (at the very least) they should just stand pat and see what happens with internal improvement. Given the strength of the East it doesn’t make sense to throw in draft picks for a trade that probably keeps them as a first round underdog.
What is the upside with Kawhi? How does he make the Raptors better? You can pretty much count on losing 75% of the games he misses so to win 50 games the Raptors have to win almost every game he plays. For Kawhi to improve the Raptors he has to have Bird or Magic type impact. He then has to outplay MJ level to win a 7-game series because he is missing 2 games on avg. His availability caps his impact potential. I dont understand how you want to trade for a player knowing that between 30-50 games a season you can get more production from someone in the stands.
He is an old man (by NBA standards) who should be transitioning into a 6th man role playing 25mpg but he is an ALL-NBA player because of the lack of talent of the current era. The fact that men in their mid to late 30s can play the wing position in the current NBA is a sure sign devolution of athleticism or rapid PED use.