Dadouv47 wrote:Devilanche wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
I don't think Muscala is a throw in. He' work well with Lakers.
Would you want SRPs or Monk or Reaves?
My guess is a buyout like Kemba, probably with Knicks again.
If muscala want out , an SRP is enough , doubt you guys have enough asset to cover the Westbrook portion of the trade though.
If I’m being realistic it probably cost 2 first , if I’m being greedy it’s 2 first and a swap somewhere in future too ( with a non OKC pick)
I don't want Westbrook back to OKC right now and even less for a 2027 FRP but we saw from last years that it wasn't THAT expensive to get rid of a bad contract (Horford/Kemba/Wall etc.). No team would offer 2 FRPs to get rid of one and a half of contract of a terrible contract.
Going by the outgoing and incoming salary I would absolutely want a second first though .
There’s a better chance that there’s another team rather than OKC willing to do this but there’s only so many gm out there secure enough to trade for a 2027 first as the reward for absorbing salary
We sent out Horford who have quite a bit of salary (with a high guarantee that force most team to be unlikely to waive his final season) for kemba . In return we got an immediate 16th pick
For this trade we are sending out favors much lower salary and absorbing Westbrook slightly higher salary (compared to kemba) . Once you consider the pick is quite a bit away … that’s how I get my second first demand.
Now if we absorb a bad contract(or two) of same length to favors around 20-25m and flip that for Westbrook I would be ok with one sole pick.
The talent back from that trade would probably means lakers prefer not doing that trade then though.
Edit : same point still remain though, don’t really want Westbrook usage rate back.