hugepatsfan wrote:doctor him wrote:For all the people who were waiting for the discounted Ben Simmons deal, they always needed to understand that you can’t win this kind of war if you have 4 years left on your deal.
The “let’s package all of the stuff we don’t want and get a top 30 player” type of deal was never going to happen.
Simmons will be elsewhere soon enough, but the leverage on when and where always sat in the Sixers front office.
I’d love to be a fly on the wall in Camden when he slinks back into the practice facility.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I mean there's a middle ground here. Ben can't be traded for pennies on the dollar but your assertion that PHI holds all the cards here and tons of leverage is delusional.
The Sixers hold all the cards when it comes to Simmons and his camp. If he wants to get paid, he's going to have to fall in line with whatever the Sixers need him to do for as long as he's here. He can't "dog it" or be outwardly disruptive because he not only doesn't have that kind of clout, he also doesn't have anyone (players, league office, media, fans, etc...) waving the flag for him. He's on an island and that's all his own making.
Now...with respect to the rest of the league...it is as it's always been. Ben is an asset as a top 30 level player with some glaring flaws and issues that shade that value to a degree. The Sixers should (and will) get something good back for him and likely that/those piece(s) fit better on the offensive end. Defensively, Simmons is so incredibly disruptive and versatile that nothing will offset his loss there.
A deal will be made and I'm guessing it'll be a "win-win" for both teams. The team acquiring Simmons will increase their talent level, and the Sixers will get better fit(s) on the roster without taking a huge hit in talent.






























