NavLDO wrote:NotTraxxe above pretty much nailed it. But simply, this is a bad deal for both sides. And yes, of course Noah/McBuckets is a much higher value than Len/Tucker. That's not even debatable, really. But the Suns will still say "no, thank you." Noah would leave right about the time when the Suns would actually need him to compete; plus he'd be 31 by then. Len, on the other hand, will be just 23, with 5 or so years left on the Suns--they will not let him go in RFA.
So all of us Suns' fans aren't "overrating" our players; it's about timing and cost, which NotTraxxe laid out beautifully.
I think that's a very reasonable view, but I don't get the sense that that's what most Suns fans were saying. If Suns fans felt Noah/McBuckets have much higher value and the issue is timing and cost I would expect respones like "Find a 3rd team for Noah and send us a bunch of young guys instead"
So all the non-Suns' fan need to get that notion out of your minds. Only ONE poster in this thread, that I recall, thinks Len will be better than Noah.
Which one?
Kerrsed wrote: His ceiling is way higher than Noah has even come close to.
1UPZ wrote:Len has looked like a future Noah minus the passing. But higher ceiling due to his offense potential.
SF88 wrote:You could make the argument that Len has outplayed Noah this season since Hornacek finally benched Plumlee.
sipclip wrote:he looks like he can be just as good as a prime Andrew Bogut.















