Trade Offers for MIN's #7?

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#81 » by City of Trees » Wed May 17, 2017 7:35 pm

MrPerfect1 wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
That is insanely bad for MIL. Not only is #7 and #10 really bad value for Middleton alone but takes away maybe MIL's best outside shooter on a team desperate for more shooting. It also would be a step back for the team, all for the chance to get 2 more non premium picks. It doesn't make any sense for MIL

Needless Content Removed--Chuck theres no way on earth middleton is worth 2 top 10 picks, cmon be reasonable


Talk about over valuing picks (especially picks near the bottom of the top 10).

See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for 7 and 10 or how many POR fans would take 7 and 10 for CJ


See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for Middleton. Or Portland fans who would trade CJ for Middleton. I'm going to guess not many, because Middleton isn't on that level of value.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
JLei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,579
And1: 2,999
Joined: Aug 25, 2009
 

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#82 » by JLei » Wed May 17, 2017 7:51 pm

bulliedog8 wrote:Rubio/Dunn (wolves pick), Lavine and #7 for Butler


This one is at least intriguing.

Dunn, Lavine and 7 (Issac) is a pretty decent haul for Jimmy.

Rubio
Butler
Wiggins
Dieng
Towns

Now that's a team there.
Modern Era Fantasy Game Champ! :king:
PG: Ricky Rubio 16
SG: Brandon Roy 09
SF: Danny Green 14
PF: Rasheed Wallace 06
C: Shaquille O'Neal 01

G: George Hill 14
F: Anthony Parker 10
C: Amir Johnson 12
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#83 » by City of Trees » Wed May 17, 2017 7:57 pm

JLei wrote:
bulliedog8 wrote:Rubio/Dunn (wolves pick), Lavine and #7 for Butler


This one is at least intriguing.

Dunn, Lavine and 7 (Issac) is a pretty decent haul for Jimmy.

Rubio
Butler
Wiggins
Dieng
Towns

Now that's a team there.


I like that Wolves squad! Doubt Bulls go for it tho.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
Sportfan73
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,920
And1: 1,320
Joined: Jun 18, 2015
   

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#84 » by Sportfan73 » Wed May 17, 2017 8:10 pm

Streakers33 wrote:
Sportfan73 wrote:Covington+ for 7?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums




Okafor, Covington, and a future first for 7 and Aldrich


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Depending on the first I think it's possible that could be worked out.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,167
And1: 8,543
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#85 » by buckboy » Wed May 17, 2017 8:16 pm

City of Trees wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:Needless Content Removed--Chuck theres no way on earth middleton is worth 2 top 10 picks, cmon be reasonable


Talk about over valuing picks (especially picks near the bottom of the top 10).

See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for 7 and 10 or how many POR fans would take 7 and 10 for CJ


See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for Middleton. Or Portland fans who would trade CJ for Middleton. I'm going to guess not many, because Middleton isn't on that level of value.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Middleton is the best of those 3 players. There is an assumption here though, and that is that he regains his health this summer. If so, I wouldn't consider trading him for either of those 2 guys. And I don't really think it's a very big if.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#86 » by City of Trees » Wed May 17, 2017 8:21 pm

buckboy wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
Talk about over valuing picks (especially picks near the bottom of the top 10).

See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for 7 and 10 or how many POR fans would take 7 and 10 for CJ


See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for Middleton. Or Portland fans who would trade CJ for Middleton. I'm going to guess not many, because Middleton isn't on that level of value.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Middleton is the best of those 3 players. There is an assumption here though, and that is that he regains his health this summer. If so, I wouldn't consider trading him for either of those 2 guys. And I don't really think it's a very big if.

Middleton is nice but I dont hold him in the same regard as you.

It's all good tho I would expect a Bucks fan to favor Middleton and there is nothing wrong with that. It's just i think you'll be disappointed with the return here.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
MrPerfect1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,372
And1: 3,433
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#87 » by MrPerfect1 » Wed May 17, 2017 8:37 pm

City of Trees wrote:
buckboy wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
See how many Wash fans would trade Beal for Middleton. Or Portland fans who would trade CJ for Middleton. I'm going to guess not many, because Middleton isn't on that level of value.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Middleton is the best of those 3 players. There is an assumption here though, and that is that he regains his health this summer. If so, I wouldn't consider trading him for either of those 2 guys. And I don't really think it's a very big if.

Middleton is nice but I dont hold him in the same regard as you.

It's all good tho I would expect a Bucks fan to favor Middleton and there is nothing wrong with that. It's just i think you'll be disappointed with the return here.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


I'd love to see the argument that Beal at an average of 25 million/year is a better asset than Middleton at 14 million/year.
nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,362
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#88 » by nomansland » Wed May 17, 2017 8:49 pm

Chandler, Barton, #13?
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,736
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#89 » by dakomish23 » Wed May 17, 2017 8:51 pm

I say MIN should keep the pick. I think they go Isaac and I find the Wiggins Isaac KAT frontcourt pretty appealing. Just need to get a better defender at the 2.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,931
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#90 » by BadWolf » Wed May 17, 2017 8:52 pm

Lavine, 7 for Middleton, 19
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#91 » by City of Trees » Wed May 17, 2017 9:08 pm

MrPerfect1 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
buckboy wrote:
Middleton is the best of those 3 players. There is an assumption here though, and that is that he regains his health this summer. If so, I wouldn't consider trading him for either of those 2 guys. And I don't really think it's a very big if.

Middleton is nice but I dont hold him in the same regard as you.

It's all good tho I would expect a Bucks fan to favor Middleton and there is nothing wrong with that. It's just i think you'll be disappointed with the return here.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


I'd love to see the argument that Beal at an average of 25 million/year is a better asset than Middleton at 14 million/year.

Middleton is a good bargain for this upcoming season and the next. Still, that doesn't make him the better player. The bargain is only temporary.

Look, I dont want you thinking I'm trashing Middleton because im not. IMO Beal and CJ are better.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
MrPerfect1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,372
And1: 3,433
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#92 » by MrPerfect1 » Wed May 17, 2017 10:09 pm

City of Trees wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Middleton is nice but I dont hold him in the same regard as you.

It's all good tho I would expect a Bucks fan to favor Middleton and there is nothing wrong with that. It's just i think you'll be disappointed with the return here.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


I'd love to see the argument that Beal at an average of 25 million/year is a better asset than Middleton at 14 million/year.

Middleton is a good bargain for this upcoming season and the next. Still, that doesn't make him the better player. The bargain is only temporary.

Look, I dont want you thinking I'm trashing Middleton because im not. IMO Beal and CJ are better.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


His contract runs through the 2019-2020 season (3 more seasons). He is 1 of the best value contracts in the league. That aside, even with his injury this year has been far more durable than Beal and is regarded as far superior defensively. If Beal is better, it is hard to imagine an argument for Beal being the better value
hege53190
Head Coach
Posts: 7,334
And1: 2,671
Joined: Nov 29, 2001

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#93 » by hege53190 » Wed May 17, 2017 10:37 pm

BadWolf wrote:Lavine, 7 for Middleton, 19


No. Not even if you take 19 out and let the bucks dump bad contracts. Just no.
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#94 » by Pinkyring » Wed May 17, 2017 11:12 pm

MrPerfect1 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
I'd love to see the argument that Beal at an average of 25 million/year is a better asset than Middleton at 14 million/year.

Middleton is a good bargain for this upcoming season and the next. Still, that doesn't make him the better player. The bargain is only temporary.

Look, I dont want you thinking I'm trashing Middleton because im not. IMO Beal and CJ are better.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


His contract runs through the 2019-2020 season (3 more seasons). He is 1 of the best value contracts in the league. That aside, even with his injury this year has been far more durable than Beal and is regarded as far superior defensively. If Beal is better, it is hard to imagine an argument for Beal being the better value

He has a player option after 2 seasons which he will surely opt out and u guys can have the beal middleton debate but any trade netting 2 top 10 picks in a solid draft fora role player is just unrealistic. I wouldnt even offer 9 overall for him personally.
UTJazzFan_Echo1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 279
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Location: Utah
 

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#95 » by UTJazzFan_Echo1 » Wed May 17, 2017 11:16 pm

Not even nibbles on the Favors, Lyles, Diaw for #7, Payne and Aldrich offer, eh?
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
YourBuddy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,378
And1: 658
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#96 » by YourBuddy » Wed May 17, 2017 11:48 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Not even nibbles on the Favors, Lyles, Diaw for #7, Payne and Aldrich offer, eh?


Nope. Favors contract situation, and play/injuries diminish his value significantly in my eyes. Lyles doesn't make up the difference.
UTJazzFan_Echo1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 279
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Location: Utah
 

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#97 » by UTJazzFan_Echo1 » Wed May 17, 2017 11:49 pm

YourBuddy wrote:
UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Not even nibbles on the Favors, Lyles, Diaw for #7, Payne and Aldrich offer, eh?


Nope. Favors contract situation, and play/injuries diminish his value significantly in my eyes. Lyles doesn't make up the difference.

Here we go with the Favors health thing again... :roll:
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#98 » by coolness » Wed May 17, 2017 11:53 pm

Ish Smith. He's not worth it on realgm probably, but maybe irl. Elite at back-up pg.

Add Marcus Morris for Dunn (it's been talked about here by Minny and Detroit fans.)

Add Hilliard and 2nd's just because I'm a Piston fan and would want this to happen.
Hilliard can shoot 3's, but never gets enough time to be in a groove. He can play some pg and sf too.
YourBuddy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,378
And1: 658
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#99 » by YourBuddy » Wed May 17, 2017 11:56 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
YourBuddy wrote:
UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Not even nibbles on the Favors, Lyles, Diaw for #7, Payne and Aldrich offer, eh?


Nope. Favors contract situation, and play/injuries diminish his value significantly in my eyes. Lyles doesn't make up the difference.

Here we go with the Favors health thing again... :roll:


Enlighten me on why Favors injuries don't impact his trade value.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Offers for MIN's #7? 

Post#100 » by moss_is_1 » Wed May 17, 2017 11:58 pm

coolness wrote:Ish Smith. He's not worth it on realgm probably, but maybe irl. Elite at back-up pg.

Add Marcus Morris for Dunn (it's been talked about here by Minny and Detroit fans.)

Add Hilliard and 2nd's just because I'm a Piston fan and would want this to happen.
Hilliard can shoot 3's, but never gets enough time to be in a groove. He can play some pg and sf too.

So Ish Smith, Marcus Morris, Hilliard and some 2nds for #7 and Dunn? I'm not sure if you're serious here.

Return to Trades and Transactions