BallnIngram wrote:So pg would sign a 3yr ext, lose out on more $ to go to bos? Yea i dont think so
I don't think he would lose money because they would give him a raise this year with the extension
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

BallnIngram wrote:So pg would sign a 3yr ext, lose out on more $ to go to bos? Yea i dont think so
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:BallnIngram wrote:So pg would sign a 3yr ext, lose out on more $ to go to bos? Yea i dont think so
I don't think he would lose money because they would give him a raise this year with the extension

BallnIngram wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:BallnIngram wrote:So pg would sign a 3yr ext, lose out on more $ to go to bos? Yea i dont think so
I don't think he would lose money because they would give him a raise this year with the extension
The reports says he loses out by signing an ext over getting a new contract
SBM wrote:Please no-one wants that trash from Boston with or without extension from PG. If PG signs extension, the going rate is more like 5 lottery picks.
Green_teamer wrote:SBM wrote:Please no-one wants that trash from Boston with or without extension from PG. If PG signs extension, the going rate is more like 5 lottery picks.
Lol your going to be so upset with whatever he goes for I can't wait.
the_process wrote:Tatum, Bradley, and the 2019 MEM 1st for PG
The only problem is tying it to Hayward, I think he's staying.
SBM wrote:Green_teamer wrote:SBM wrote:Please no-one wants that trash from Boston with or without extension from PG. If PG signs extension, the going rate is more like 5 lottery picks.
Lol your going to be so upset with whatever he goes for I can't wait.
Lol, Cousin goes for what 3 recent lottery picks, 1 yr and about 25 games, close to a rental.
the_process wrote:Tatum, Bradley, and the 2019 MEM 1st for PG
The only problem is tying it to Hayward, I think he's staying.
Green_teamer wrote:the_process wrote:Tatum, Bradley, and the 2019 MEM 1st for PG
The only problem is tying it to Hayward, I think he's staying.
If Heyward is coming we need to trade Bradley and Crowder for georg with another small contract like Smart or Jackson...and ainge wouldn't even put Tatum on the table for Butler who had 2 years left he's not going to offer it for George. But if Heyward isn't coming then this whole exercise is moot because this is all contingent on Heyward coming
the_process wrote:Green_teamer wrote:the_process wrote:Tatum, Bradley, and the 2019 MEM 1st for PG
The only problem is tying it to Hayward, I think he's staying.
If Heyward is coming we need to trade Bradley and Crowder for georg with another small contract like Smart or Jackson...and ainge wouldn't even put Tatum on the table for Butler who had 2 years left he's not going to offer it for George. But if Heyward isn't coming then this whole exercise is moot because this is all contingent on Heyward coming
OK. I heard Stevens' comments about Tatum... he could care less about the guy.

the_process wrote:Tatum, Bradley, and the 2019 MEM 1st for PG
The only problem is tying it to Hayward, I think he's staying.


SBM wrote:Please no-one wants that trash from Boston with or without extension from PG. If PG signs extension, the going rate is more like 5 lottery picks.
Green_teamer wrote:the_process wrote:Green_teamer wrote:
If Heyward is coming we need to trade Bradley and Crowder for georg with another small contract like Smart or Jackson...and ainge wouldn't even put Tatum on the table for Butler who had 2 years left he's not going to offer it for George. But if Heyward isn't coming then this whole exercise is moot because this is all contingent on Heyward coming
OK. I heard Stevens' comments about Tatum... he could care less about the guy.
By everything I've seen Stevens is in love with him and seems excited for next year. Ainge was just on the radio and he said he could definitely say he would of taken Tatum # 1
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Green_teamer wrote:the_process wrote:
OK. I heard Stevens' comments about Tatum... he could care less about the guy.
By everything I've seen Stevens is in love with him and seems excited for next year. Ainge was just on the radio and he said he could definitely say he would of taken Tatum # 1
Not saying he doesn't love Tatum but going on the radio and saying that holds little weight TBH. The Kings would say we would have taken Fox first, Magic would say they would have taken Ball, Phx would say they would have taken Jackson. Gotta hype up your own guy, especially when you traded rights to Fultz.
Green_teamer wrote:the_process wrote:Green_teamer wrote:
If Heyward is coming we need to trade Bradley and Crowder for georg with another small contract like Smart or Jackson...and ainge wouldn't even put Tatum on the table for Butler who had 2 years left he's not going to offer it for George. But if Heyward isn't coming then this whole exercise is moot because this is all contingent on Heyward coming
OK. I heard Stevens' comments about Tatum... he could care less about the guy.
By everything I've seen Stevens is in love with him and seems excited for next year. Ainge was just on the radio and he said he could definitely say he would of taken Tatum # 1

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:So the money for PG:
nba.nbcsports.com/2017/06/23/paul-george-gordon-hayward-celtics-rumor-doesnt-add-up/
The renegotiate and extend is the only route that really makes sense and I haven't done all the math to see if it's possible, but they can sign Hayward outright by declining the options they have, then trade Bradley, Crowder, Smart, LAC pick for PG, and can someone check here would they have the extra 10 mil or so for the raise? I don't think so with the lowered cap but curious
Return to Trades and Transactions