Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Powell for Trent: your take?

Beyond the Norm: Portland wins. Trent was likely a goner in the offseason anyway, so why not a win-now upgrade?
8
16%
Living In Your Head Trent-Free: Toronto wins. Powell was likely a goner in the offseason anyway, so why not an RFA you can match?
21
42%
The Powell Behind the Throne: both teams win. Portland thinks short-term, Toronto thinks long.
16
32%
Hoodwinked: both teams lose. Portland should have gotten frontcourt help, Toronto should have found someone they *don't* have to pay anyway.
5
10%
 
Total votes: 50

User avatar
Troubadour
RealGM
Posts: 14,342
And1: 8,322
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#81 » by Troubadour » Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:47 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
Troubadour wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:i don't love this one for either side.

From TOR's perspective, if your going into the $20MM range for this level of player, i'd prefer to pay Powell. Or I'd prefer someone cost controlled and/or picks.

From POR's perspective, your going to have $80MM tied up in 3 guards below 6-3. I would have prefered to move trent for a wing with size. In the short term I guess if you weren't going to pay Trent, and couldn't justify trading him for a downgrade with Dame, then the short term upgrade to Powell makes some sense.

But I really don't like this for Toronto. The formula to winning isn't paying average to above average starters $20MM per year (and they will have 3 in that range with FVV and OG along with Trent) and if your going there, why not just keep Powell.


Do you think Trent gets that in free agency? I think part of the appeal is having a much lower cap hold that gives you the option to sign a free agent and then re-sign Trent. With Norm, it was one or the other.


trading for restricted free agents always worries me because all it takes is one team with its core on rookie scale deals to overpay to try to steal a player.


Fair, but I think there are bigger targets out there for that kind of move. Ball, Allen, Collins, and Monk even.
User avatar
gom
Heat forum: Expert Predictor
Posts: 18,587
And1: 42,660
Joined: May 30, 2014
Location: Earth-616
   

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#82 » by gom » Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:51 pm

Norman Powell for the Blazers is a great move. I like the players going to Toronto too though.
Image
I remember 11-30 with these guys. ^
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,679
And1: 10,340
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#83 » by Myth » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:22 pm

Waynearchetype wrote:
the_process wrote:Trent isn’t going to be much cheaper for TOR to re-sign than Powell would’ve been. And Powell is better offensively and Hood is dead money. Portland win.


Portland doesn't have 16 shots to go around to Powell coming off the bench. Portland also has desperate need for SF/PF/C starters. Very unlikely to resign him after this year. They're punting youth for a rental in a season that already looks dismal. Terrible trade, from a Portland fan perspective.

Portland gave up 18fga in Trent and Hood. I don’t see why Powell can’t get near 16.
tester551
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,499
And1: 1,224
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#84 » by tester551 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:27 pm

Roy The Natural wrote:
cucad8 wrote:
Malapropism wrote:Because the most likely scenario is still a first round exit + Powell leaving this summer.

Trent was likely leaving this summer as well. Matching an offer at 18-20 makes him immediately a terrible trade asset. And then our fans would be crying about that. So if you're unlikely to retain either, might as well swap out for the better player.


You're looking at it the wrong way. I have no problems with Trent being traded... You don't however trade an asset for a rental unless that rental changes your trajectory.

The obvious end-game here is a fire sale in the off-season after another 1st round exit. Why?... Because Portland refuses to use assets to build a roster around Lillard that fits.

It will be interesting to see in the remaining season.
There could be a strong argument that Powell fits better with Dame than CJ does.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1,576
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#85 » by Blazinaway » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:29 pm

Myth wrote:
Waynearchetype wrote:
the_process wrote:Trent isn’t going to be much cheaper for TOR to re-sign than Powell would’ve been. And Powell is better offensively and Hood is dead money. Portland win.


Portland doesn't have 16 shots to go around to Powell coming off the bench. Portland also has desperate need for SF/PF/C starters. Very unlikely to resign him after this year. They're punting youth for a rental in a season that already looks dismal. Terrible trade, from a Portland fan perspective.

Portland gave up 18fga in Trent and Hood. I don’t see why Powell can’t get near 16.


correct, and why wouldn't Powell play a good bit of SF? I read 40% of his minutes are at SF, would not be surprised if he started games at SF with ROCO ay the 4, Nurk is due back tomorrow as well
tester551
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,499
And1: 1,224
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#86 » by tester551 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:29 pm

TD2FutureStar wrote:Something not being talked about now but will be in about an hour when Kyle Kowry is still a Raptor....is the fact that the Raptors didn't have e the Cap room to re-sign both Powell and Lowry. Keeping then both meant at least 1 of then were going to walk for nothing. With this deal for Trent and his tiny $2mill cap hild the Raptors now have the ability to re-sign Lowry to his 2/50 he requested.

So basically you get Lowry + Trent vs having just Lowry or Norm. You couldn't have both.

Big W for the Raptors.

Raptors had bird rights on both Lowry and Powell. Theoretically, they could have re-signed both to contracts up to the max.
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,665
And1: 4,693
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#87 » by CptCrunch » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:33 pm

Gary Trent Jr is likely the best player in the trade.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1,576
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#88 » by Blazinaway » Thu Mar 25, 2021 8:35 pm

CptCrunch wrote:Gary Trent Jr is likely the best player in the trade.


no way IMO, he's come down to earth a good bit after a very hot start, his D is avg at best, and IMO he's too much of a chucker, has been taking a lot of bad shots (contract year?), IMO if gets to be as good as Powell is now that would be is max upside
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,165
And1: 4,252
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#89 » by JasonStern » Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:17 pm

CptCrunch wrote:Gary Trent Jr is likely the best player in the trade.


Short-term? No.
Long-term? Likely.
Image
"Hate all you want. The Bucks will trade Doc Rivers for me."
- Chauncey Billups
Morris_Shatford
Senior Mod - Raptors
Senior Mod - Raptors
Posts: 19,230
And1: 5,677
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Section 118
     

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#90 » by Morris_Shatford » Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:37 pm

CptCrunch wrote:Gary Trent Jr is likely the best player in the trade.


Long term, maybe?
But right now Norm is playing on a different level.
Image
Thanks to Clutch0z24 for the Sig!
The Graduate
Freshman
Posts: 76
And1: 73
Joined: May 10, 2008

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#91 » by The Graduate » Thu Mar 25, 2021 10:29 pm

Roy The Natural wrote:
cucad8 wrote:
Roy The Natural wrote:I mean... some will disagree but unless something for CJ is lined up, I view this as an utter disaster for Portland.

How is upgrading Trent to Powell an utter disaster?


Powell will not be retained. Powell doesn't change the trajectory of the team. Trent has value. Portland should get long-term value for Trent unless it's a needle-moving short term move. This is the Aaron Afflalo trade all over again. It's a disastrous mismanagement of home-grown assets for Portland.


Why in the world would Powell not be retained? At least sign him as an asset. You can move him or CJ later if so desired.
Roy The Natural
RealGM
Posts: 10,302
And1: 5,450
Joined: Nov 07, 2014

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#92 » by Roy The Natural » Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:00 pm

The Graduate wrote:
Roy The Natural wrote:
cucad8 wrote:How is upgrading Trent to Powell an utter disaster?


Powell will not be retained. Powell doesn't change the trajectory of the team. Trent has value. Portland should get long-term value for Trent unless it's a needle-moving short term move. This is the Aaron Afflalo trade all over again. It's a disastrous mismanagement of home-grown assets for Portland.


Why in the world would Powell not be retained? At least sign him as an asset. You can move him or CJ later if so desired.


I'm sure they'd "like" to retain him. I doubt that Portland will pony up the money required however. I don't see Portland sinking $110M a year into 3 guards.
Nate the Great
Pro Prospect
Posts: 912
And1: 410
Joined: Dec 13, 2019
     

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#93 » by Nate the Great » Fri Mar 26, 2021 12:23 am

Van_Trump wrote:2nd Time Toronto has traded for Gary Trent from Portland

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-feb-14-sp-19093-story.html


Specifically, Gary Trent Sr. and Jr. were both traded from Portland to Toronto 41 games into their third seasons. That’s quite a coincidence.

Black Lives Matter
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#94 » by loserX » Fri Mar 26, 2021 12:41 am

Nate the Great wrote:
Van_Trump wrote:2nd Time Toronto has traded for Gary Trent from Portland

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-feb-14-sp-19093-story.html


Specifically, Gary Trent Sr. and Jr. were both traded from Portland to Toronto 41 games into their third seasons. That’s quite a coincidence.


That. Is. Amazing.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,679
And1: 10,340
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#95 » by Myth » Fri Mar 26, 2021 3:49 am

loserX wrote:
Nate the Great wrote:
Van_Trump wrote:2nd Time Toronto has traded for Gary Trent from Portland

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-feb-14-sp-19093-story.html


Specifically, Gary Trent Sr. and Jr. were both traded from Portland to Toronto 41 games into their third seasons. That’s quite a coincidence.


That. Is. Amazing.

Now we just need a Gary III to be born next year to restart the cycle.
BuddyBuckets
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,340
And1: 1,052
Joined: Jan 23, 2019
 

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#96 » by BuddyBuckets » Fri Mar 26, 2021 11:43 am

I like Trent for Toronto moving forward, it's great compensation for Powell. I like the deal for Portland too trying to make a deep playoff run now. I think it's a win-win deal
Brandon-Clyde
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 5,789
Joined: May 29, 2008
     

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#97 » by Brandon-Clyde » Fri Mar 26, 2021 3:48 pm

:banghead:
Nate the Great wrote:
Van_Trump wrote:2nd Time Toronto has traded for Gary Trent from Portland

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-feb-14-sp-19093-story.html


Specifically, Gary Trent Sr. and Jr. were both traded from Portland to Toronto 41 games into their third seasons. That’s quite a coincidence.

Both were also drafted by another team( Senior by Milwaukee and Junior by Sacramento) but were traded to Portland as part of draft day deals.
There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect." -- Ronald Reagan
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1,576
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#98 » by Blazinaway » Sat Mar 27, 2021 2:02 pm

Wow, only one game but after what I saw from Powell last night I think POR crushed this trade, what a talented/efficient player, doesn't force things like our other guards too often do, great shooter, passed well. Bottom line fit like a glove in first game with new team. Easily another full level above Trent Jr IMO - I hope Gary eventually gets here as he is a good guy and hard worker
User avatar
Parataxis
General Manager
Posts: 9,354
And1: 5,694
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Location: Penticton, BC
       

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#99 » by Parataxis » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:00 pm

Blazinaway wrote:Wow, only one game but after what I saw from Powell last night I think POR crushed this trade, what a talented/efficient player, doesn't force things like our other guards too often do, great shooter, passed well. Bottom line fit like a glove in first game with new team. Easily another full level above Trent Jr IMO - I hope Gary eventually gets here as he is a good guy and hard worker


Powell is the sort of player who can fit well into lots of systems. He's unselfish, smart, and knows when to pick his opportunities.
Yenrallik1111
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,929
And1: 336
Joined: Nov 14, 2020

Re: Woj: Powell for Trent, Hood 

Post#100 » by Yenrallik1111 » Sun Mar 28, 2021 12:00 am

Blazinaway wrote:
CptCrunch wrote:Gary Trent Jr is likely the best player in the trade.


no way IMO, he's come down to earth a good bit after a very hot start, his D is avg at best, and IMO he's too much of a chucker, has been taking a lot of bad shots (contract year?), IMO if gets to be as good as Powell is now that would be is max upside


gotta disagree here. Trent is 22, Norm is 27. Norm has pretty solid numbers but trent is not too far behind. tamponto has also been pretty good at developing young talent. I do not see trent turning into a star but the dude can get a fair amount better yet.

Return to Trades and Transactions