R-DAWG wrote:Troubadour wrote:R-DAWG wrote:i don't love this one for either side.
From TOR's perspective, if your going into the $20MM range for this level of player, i'd prefer to pay Powell. Or I'd prefer someone cost controlled and/or picks.
From POR's perspective, your going to have $80MM tied up in 3 guards below 6-3. I would have prefered to move trent for a wing with size. In the short term I guess if you weren't going to pay Trent, and couldn't justify trading him for a downgrade with Dame, then the short term upgrade to Powell makes some sense.
But I really don't like this for Toronto. The formula to winning isn't paying average to above average starters $20MM per year (and they will have 3 in that range with FVV and OG along with Trent) and if your going there, why not just keep Powell.
Do you think Trent gets that in free agency? I think part of the appeal is having a much lower cap hold that gives you the option to sign a free agent and then re-sign Trent. With Norm, it was one or the other.
trading for restricted free agents always worries me because all it takes is one team with its core on rookie scale deals to overpay to try to steal a player.
Fair, but I think there are bigger targets out there for that kind of move. Ball, Allen, Collins, and Monk even.