brackdan70 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:So who will pick up Lillard?
Low cost high upside move
How is it high upside?
He returns end of season or start of next season and produces all star level value?
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
brackdan70 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:So who will pick up Lillard?
Low cost high upside move
How is it high upside?
zimpy27 wrote:brackdan70 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:So who will pick up Lillard?
Low cost high upside move
How is it high upside?
He returns end of season or start of next season and produces all star level value?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:Still think Kleber/Vincent/Knecht for Claxton should happen. Then the Lakers push for Horford as well. But LA won't because that's future money.
Not sure how you get Luka, still have Lebron, and want to wait 2 years to try and put the team together. Weird. Luka showed just a year ago he doesn't need that much.
zimpy27 wrote:So who will pick up Lillard?
Low cost high upside move
parsnips33 wrote:Are we really gonna try the Kuminga thing again? JFC
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Are we really gonna try the Kuminga thing again? JFC
I hadn't seen this. What are you guys paying him?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:Miami is still there for him. Brooklyn may decide to try and add one real piece this off-season. Plus we've seen some teams get really creative. I wouldn't give up at all on him finding a new team.
Texas Chuck wrote:Still think Kleber/Vincent/Knecht for Claxton should happen. Then the Lakers push for Horford as well. But LA won't because that's future money.
Not sure how you get Luka, still have Lebron, and want to wait 2 years to try and put the team together. Weird. Luka showed just a year ago he doesn't need that much.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Still think Kleber/Vincent/Knecht for Claxton should happen. Then the Lakers push for Horford as well. But LA won't because that's future money.
Not sure how you get Luka, still have Lebron, and want to wait 2 years to try and put the team together. Weird. Luka showed just a year ago he doesn't need that much.
Are we adding unprotected future picks?
Cause if not, I’m not seeing the allure for the Nets.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
NYG wrote:So... early winners/losers?
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Devilanche wrote:NYG wrote:So... early winners/losers?
Denver and Atlanta winners.
No outright losers cause I didn’t see any signings that will cost picks to move. At most traded for other questionable signings.
Return to Trades and Transactions