Det/Min

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Det/Min 

Post#1 » by revprodeji » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:03 am

**I personally think that MN is waiting for the FA PF to drop and then will trade Al to one of the teams that cleared cap but missed out on the FA PF**

This trade is done with the premise that the draft day trade was conditionally accepted. That trade was

prince+7+wilcox
for
Jefferson+23+16

The condition was that Cousins and Monroe were not available for the 7th pick. Clearly Monroe was there and the trade did not go through.

My counter is this.

Prince+Daye+pick swap
for
Jefferson
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,681
And1: 1,929
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Det/Min 

Post#2 » by Krapinsky » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:16 am

I don't like it. I am not high on Daye. Prince does not hold a lot of value to us since he is not in our long term plans. The pick swap seems worthless since Detroit is in the east and adding Monroe and Jefferson. Conclusion: I would prefer cap space (i.e. Eric Dampier) and the opportunity to sign David Lee over this package.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
DetroitPistons
RealGM
Posts: 16,113
And1: 3,441
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
Location: Michigan

Re: Det/Min 

Post#3 » by DetroitPistons » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:16 am

Yes. Please. Now. i love that trade for detroit. would you rather have jerebko or daye? i prefer daye but i know some people like jerebko more. also, i agree that minny wants to wait to trade jefferson to a team that misses out on the big free agents but you never know.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,214
And1: 4,256
Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Location: The Detroit Sad Boys era

Re: Det/Min 

Post#4 » by vege » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:17 am

This trade idea is dead already.

Minny don't need prince anymore, they drafted/traded for a crapload of wingers.

Detroit does not need Big Al anymore. They drafted Monroe and as much as i was told that you don't sign or trade bigmans to fit next to Monroe yet, you do need to see him play and see if he will be a PF or a C in the league and what exactly he brings to the table, i think it's pretty safe to say Big Al and Monroe will be terrible defensively you add CV and BG and you got to believe that's not the direction a team should go.

To make things worse for Detroit. They have a lot of money locked on Rip and BG and they would create another insane logjan with Max + CV and now Big Al. Too much money locked in 2 positions, especially because next season Detroit have to extend Stuckey and Jonas.

As if it's not bad enough there is another serious problem, if Detroit trade both Prince and Daye they would be left with Jerebko and Summers to play SF and that is not even close to be enough depth for Detroit.

The time for this trade was before the draft and i think Joe D is glad he didn't pulled the trigger, not sure exactly how minny feel about not doing the trade.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Det/Min 

Post#5 » by revprodeji » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:19 am

I like Daye, I think he can be a very good prospect. I was bothered we did not get him last year.

Prince is an expiring contract with vet value. He could be flipped near the deadline, or be used as a vet mentor now.

Pick-swap is always nice if they get lucky in the lotto.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
DetroitPistons
RealGM
Posts: 16,113
And1: 3,441
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
Location: Michigan

Re: Det/Min 

Post#6 » by DetroitPistons » Sun Jul 4, 2010 6:24 am

Just because dumars trades for jefferson doesn't mean hes done with the offseason. he could still trade rip (and probably would) at the deadline or something. maxiell as well. wilcox is already expriring. if you get at least some expirings for those guys then we could resign stuckey. jerebko's extension wont be much anyways (i prefer we trade him while his stock is relatively high anyways). if that trade went down i would throw the MLE at josh howard.

Stuckey/Bynum/White
Gordon/Stuckey/White
Howard/Jerebko/Summers
Jefferson/Villanueva/Jerebko
Monroe/Wallace

Thats a good playoff team that could do some damage if they commit to the defensive end. excellent bench too.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 12,982
And1: 6,067
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Det/Min 

Post#7 » by shangrila » Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:24 am

revprodeji wrote:Pick-swap is always nice if they get lucky in the lotto.

What are you expecting from them next season? Hell, what are you expecting from the Wolves?

I don't know about you but I don't think we're going to leave the bottom 5 and Detroit will be in the hunt for a playoff spot after adding Jefferson, making a pick swap useless. A top 10 or top 5 protected pick would be good enough.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Det/Min 

Post#8 » by revprodeji » Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:49 am

I was mostly putting it in if Detroit gets lucky in the lotto. We know the wolves will never get a top-3 pick, but this way we could swap with Detroit if they did.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,327
And1: 1,099
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: Det/Min 

Post#9 » by Warspite » Sun Jul 4, 2010 8:54 am

pistons counter with

1. Prince+Daye+2011 pick top 10 protected and the Wolves add Brewer to jefferson.

2. Rip+ Daye + Stuckey+ unprotected 2011 for Jefferson, Brewer, Sessions
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,336
And1: 912
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Det/Min 

Post#10 » by Saltine » Sun Jul 4, 2010 10:17 am

Add jerebko into deal #1 and I think it works :)
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 12,982
And1: 6,067
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Det/Min 

Post#11 » by shangrila » Sun Jul 4, 2010 10:28 am

revprodeji wrote:I was mostly putting it in if Detroit gets lucky in the lotto. We know the wolves will never get a top-3 pick, but this way we could swap with Detroit if they did.

But if they're not worse then us then there's no point in doing it. I'd rather just have a protected first
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,255
And1: 14,637
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Det/Min 

Post#12 » by shrink » Sun Jul 4, 2010 2:10 pm

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key= ... 3SXc&gid=1

Right now, no team has traded a completely unprotected pick. I think unprotected picks are becoming extinct, and pick swaps without protections will soon follow them. While winning a Top lottery spot in the draft is unlikely, the size of the loss is too much risk for a team's front office.
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Det/Min 

Post#13 » by princeofpalace » Sun Jul 4, 2010 2:52 pm

So Dumars wouldnt give up #7 for Jefferson but now he's willing to give up Daye + a pick swap with no protections on it? Yeah, I dont see that happening
User avatar
Swimmer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 9
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Re: Det/Min 

Post#14 » by Swimmer » Sun Jul 4, 2010 4:16 pm

princeofpalace wrote:So Dumars wouldnt give up #7 for Jefferson but now he's willing to give up Daye + a pick swap with no protections on it? Yeah, I dont see that happening


I don't get it. I'd rather have the #7 than Daye + pick swap. I am pretty confident that Detroit will be better than Minny next year, and REALLY confident that DET + Al Jeff is way better than MIN - Al Jeff. So, you would have to jump Minnesota through the lottery, assuming you fall into the lottery. The pick swap really has very small value, since even in the worst case scenario (extremely unlikely), you are trading a likely top 3 pick for a likely top 5 pick.
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Det/Min 

Post#15 » by princeofpalace » Sun Jul 4, 2010 5:02 pm

Swimmer wrote:
princeofpalace wrote:So Dumars wouldnt give up #7 for Jefferson but now he's willing to give up Daye + a pick swap with no protections on it? Yeah, I dont see that happening


I don't get it. I'd rather have the #7 than Daye + pick swap. I am pretty confident that Detroit will be better than Minny next year, and REALLY confident that DET + Al Jeff is way better than MIN - Al Jeff. So, you would have to jump Minnesota through the lottery, assuming you fall into the lottery. The pick swap really has very small value, since even in the worst case scenario (extremely unlikely), you are trading a likely top 3 pick for a likely top 5 pick.


I don't believe that Al Jefferson makes Detroit any better in the win column

I expect Detroit to be right back into the lottery, Detroit will not risk a top pick which I think they will have a very good shot at to acquire Jefferson.

The most Joe D offers for Jefferson IMO should be Prince/Daye, no pick swap. And even then, I dont see Dumars having much interest in acquiring Jefferson without somehow managing to move Rips contract.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Det/Min 

Post#16 » by [RCG] » Sun Jul 4, 2010 5:45 pm

Warspite wrote:pistons counter with

1. Prince+Daye+2011 pick top 10 protected and the Wolves add Brewer to jefferson.

2. Rip+ Daye + Stuckey+ unprotected 2011 for Jefferson, Brewer, Sessions



1. Jefferson > Prince & Brewer > Daye

2. Jefferson >> Rip & Brewer > Daye & Sessions > Stuckey

Both cases I don't think the 2011 pick evens out the trade
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,327
And1: 1,099
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: Det/Min 

Post#17 » by Warspite » Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:20 pm

[RCG] wrote:
Warspite wrote:pistons counter with

1. Prince+Daye+2011 pick top 10 protected and the Wolves add Brewer to jefferson.

2. Rip+ Daye + Stuckey+ unprotected 2011 for Jefferson, Brewer, Sessions



1. Jefferson > Prince & Brewer > Daye

2. Jefferson >> Rip & Brewer > Daye & Sessions > Stuckey

Both cases I don't think the 2011 pick evens out the trade


You might be making an argument talent wise but thats not what we are talking about. Al Jefferson has asked for a trade and T pups have been trying to unload him. He hasnt shown that hes recovered but he is healthy. Jeffersons value drops every day what you trade him for in Sept or Oct will be a fraction of what you can get today. if Kahn waits untill fall he will sending a #1 pick out with Jefferson.

I tried to offer a fair and reasonable deal that at least 50% of Pistons fans would not do. Vege explained why the OP offer just doesnt work. I also dont see any taking into account of Dumars/Kahn and the fact that Dumars always abuses GMs and Kahn is a moron. These 2 are basicly Jerry West vs Babcock/Paxson.

Unlike on RealGM sometimes you have to give to get and sometimes there is addition by subtraction. You just cant unload a player on near max contract thats not 100% healthy and who you dont think makes your team better and you only won 15 games and expect even .50 on the dollar.

Jeffersons value to the Pistons<< Jeffersons value to the avg NBA team<Jefersons value as a player<Jeffersons value on RealGM<<<<<< Jeffersons value to T Wolves fans.

Id like to have Jefferson but I know that adding him w/o dumping Rip means that Stuckey/JJ will leave as a FAs. Trading Prince for Jefferson puts the Pistons 2012 payroll around 70 million.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Det/Min 

Post#18 » by revprodeji » Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:51 pm

You think Al's value declines and we will include an asset? really?
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...

Return to Trades and Transactions