San Antonio and Sacramento: TONY PARKER

The_Commish · Post #1 » by **The_Commish** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:26 pm

Spurs Trade: Tony Parker, Antonio McDyess
Kings Trade: Samuel Dalembert, Jason Thompson, Beno Udrih

- many saying George Hill is ready to take full control of point guard duties on the team. He has a little bit of pressure taken off, or put on since Beno could become their starter if he outplays Hill.
-Sammy D is the best player to put beside Timmy D because of his great defensive down low.
- Thompson is going to be a very good replacement for Duncan in the near future

- Kings solidify their lineup with a great PG to play with Tyreke.
- Keep a good backup to teach Cousins and Landry a few things.

samuraix · Post #2 » by **samuraix** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:28 pm

If you take out JT, Sac would do it since Parker is going be a 1-year rental.
However, I don't know if SAS would do it without JT.

rpa · Post #3 » by **rpa** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:33 pm

Does Parker make the Kings a contender? No
Is he a longterm solution? No (not w/ his contract)
Does he fit with the Kings? No

So WHY are the Kings making this trade?

LPKingsFan · Post #4 » by **LPKingsFan** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:46 pm

I'd rather go for Ginobili and leave Evans at PG. What would the Spurs want in such a deal?

PaKwAn · Post #5 » by **PaKwAn** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:09 pm

sac says no... not worth the 1yr rental for tony parker...

Post #6 » by **Nolan** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:28 pm

LPKingsFan wrote:I'd rather go for Ginobili and leave Evans at PG. What would the Spurs want in such a deal?

Honestly you guys have no one we'd be interested in.

And we'd never do the OP's trade, we have no need for Dalembert or Thompson.

longfellow44 · Post #7 » by **longfellow44** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:29 pm

I would do dalembert for Parker but that's about it. The guy is a rental and isn't the type to resign with the kings.

The original deal is insulting.

vege · Post #8 » by **vege** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:43 pm

longfellow44 wrote:The original deal is insulting.

For SA.

longfellow44 · Post #9 » by **longfellow44** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:47 pm

Lol an expiring Parker isn't worth much to a team that isn't competing in the playoffs. He's nothing more than an expiring to the kings. So take this weak offer back to San Antonio.

Silver Man · Post #10 » by **Silver Man** » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:49 am

No for the Kings. I would not give up two of our bigs expiring or not for another expiring. If we traded away Daly and Thompson at this point, we would end up with Cousins, Landry, Mcdyess (who doesn't help us) and Whiteside as our bigs. Whiteside isn't ready yet and that's why we need to hold onto Daly, and Thompson.

longfellow44 · Post #11 » by **longfellow44** » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:53 am

I see the kings keeping Landry, they will pay him, dalembert walks if we don't trade him. Kings have to keep atleast 1 of Landry and dalembert in addition to Thompson whiteside and cousins because whiteside isn't likely to be ready for a while.

Likely big rotation next season.

Landry/Thompson
Cousins/whiteside