Page 1 of 2

another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:48 pm
by shagadelic45
mil trades: ellis, gooden



lal trades: gasol, meeks


bucks get gasol and help at sg and dump gooden, lakers get bench help but take on gooden's deal

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:19 pm
by magic wand time
nvm.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:32 pm
by shagadelic45
i think it is a win win

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:12 pm
by shagadelic45
any bucks fans want to chime in?

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:25 pm
by RandyBreuer
looks good if you throw in Morris or Meeks, can't see LA getting expirings or guys on good contracts for Gasol. I will eat a huge plate of crow followed by a big slice of humble pie if I am wrong.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:46 pm
by tski1972
The Bucks already are thin at SG and this makes it worse.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:22 pm
by shagadelic45
lakers can add meeks....i'l make sme changes

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:44 am
by shagadelic45
edited.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:45 am
by AussieBuck
Yeah this is pretty much the only Pau deal I'd do.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:48 am
by Jazza2319
I'd do it, but our major hole is at the 3. Ellis would help handle the ball, but we aren't going anywhere as long as Metta is our 3

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:11 am
by Kobe System
You want us to trade for GOODEN without giving them Blake or Duhon? Lakers decline.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:15 am
by Baddy Chuck
Jazza2319 wrote:I'd do it, but our major hole is at the 3. Ellis would help handle the ball, but we aren't going anywhere as long as Metta is our 3

You can have Marquis Daniels ;).

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:07 am
by old rem
tski1972 wrote:The Bucks already are thin at SG and this makes it worse.


Bucks sahould not get stuck with Pau's huge $ hit when he's no plus now or long term.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:08 pm
by shagadelic45
bucks mgmt. have said thy are interested supposedly

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:00 pm
by magic wand time
I don't like the deal, but...
Jazza2319 wrote:I'd do it, but our major hole is at the 3. Ellis would help handle the ball, but we aren't going anywhere as long as Metta is our 3

If Ellis comes, Kobe will probably play 30mpg at the 3 with Artest getting the other. That's not a major hole. Ellis and Morris will play most of the 2 in the D'Ant sys.

Kobe System wrote:You want us to trade for GOODEN without giving them Blake or Duhon? Lakers decline.

Looks like Blake is done for the season, meaning Duhon is the only real true pg backup.

shagadelic45 wrote:mil trades: ellis, gooden
lal trades: gasol, meeks
bucks get gasol and help at sg and dump gooden, lakers get bench help but take on gooden's deal

If Gasol goes, LA must get a serviceable b/u C now that Hill is done. This doesn't solve that problem.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:47 pm
by shagadelic45
gooden would be the help at pf/c

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:53 pm
by shagadelic45
The Bucks already are thin at SG and this makes it worse.


i've added meeks as sg help

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:13 pm
by trwi7
magic wand time wrote:If Gasol goes, LA must get a serviceable b/u C now that Hill is done. This doesn't solve that problem.


Still works financially if the Bucks add Dalembert.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:49 pm
by magic wand time
trwi7 wrote:
magic wand time wrote:If Gasol goes, LA must get a serviceable b/u C now that Hill is done. This doesn't solve that problem.


Still works financially if the Bucks add Dalembert.

Ok, Dalembert/Ellis for Gasol/Meeks. Accepted. No take-backs.

Re: another bucks and lakers

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:17 am
by H2tObes
magic wand time wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
magic wand time wrote:If Gasol goes, LA must get a serviceable b/u C now that Hill is done. This doesn't solve that problem.


Still works financially if the Bucks add Dalembert.

Ok, Dalembert/Ellis for Gasol/Meeks. Accepted. No take-backs.

Oh trust me, we won't want them back. :lol: