Cavs in: Middlerton, Henson, Parker, Beverley, Dekker, Harrell
Cavs out: Irving, TT, Shump
Bucks in: Deandre Jordon, Lou Williams
Bucks out: Middleton, Henson, Parker
Clippers in: Irving, TT, Shump
Clippers out: Jordon, Lou W, Beverley, Dekker, Harrell
Cavs get some win now players and some young guys. They take on Henson's contract (which IS worse than Shumps no matter what some Bucks fans think). Cavs could take Monroe instead of Henson--not sure which is better for us or for the Bucks.
Bucks get a stud center to go with their core. They dump Henson in the process.
Brogdon
Lou
Gianis
Teletovic (or Maker?)
Deandre
Or they can go with Snell at SF, Gianis at PF.
Clippers get Kyrie to pair with Blake and Gallo.
Kyrie
Shump or Rivers
Gallo
Blake
TT
Is a nice lineup with some youth in it. 3 players with championship experience.
I assume all will hate it. Cavs fans will say we don't have a real center after the trade--but I believe Henson and Harrell can fill in reasonably for TT-and the other gains overcome that loss. Bucks fans will say we aren't trading Middleton for Michael Jordan let alone Deandre. Clips fans will say-well I have no idea what they will say.
So fire away!
Cavs-Clips-Bucks
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Cavs-Clips-Bucks
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 925
- And1: 134
- Joined: Nov 19, 2008
- Location: Avon, Ohio
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,793
- And1: 714
- Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
Really think it has possibilities for all the teams, but you are probably right...all fans will hate it.
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,870
- And1: 9,368
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
I wouldn't give up Middleton and Parker for Irving who has a longer contract than DJ. I am definitely not giving up both to have one year of DJ.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
- skones
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,003
- And1: 17,163
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
I'm not giving up that much for Jordan.
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
-
- Junior
- Posts: 294
- And1: 36
- Joined: Jul 25, 2015
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
middleton is worth more than Jordan and by a lot and that would be even if Jordan wasn't a one year rental.This is terrible for the bucks As good as Jordan is on defense. I don't thin the bucks have enough offence to make the playoffs in the weak east and then the next year the core is gone and its rebuild this is a joke add the fact Middleton's contract is fantastic Makes this one of the worse offers I have seen for the bucks. this also seems way out of whack for the clipps that much for a rental and peices
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
- QRich3
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 5,844
- And1: 3,946
- Joined: Apr 03, 2011
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
If the Bucks were giving all of that for Jordan-Lou, I don't want Kyrie Irving, I'll just take Middleton. They won't, cause as the above poster says, Middleton has more value than Jordan.
I've said it a few times on this board I think, if the Bucks were to entertain offers for Middleton centered around Jordan + stuff, I would give quite a lot of stuff to get it done.
I've said it a few times on this board I think, if the Bucks were to entertain offers for Middleton centered around Jordan + stuff, I would give quite a lot of stuff to get it done.
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 11,612
- And1: 7,937
- Joined: Dec 13, 2013
Re: Cavs-Clips-Bucks
I don't hate the bones of the deal, and it's a different idea of the few Kyrie trades I've actually looked at, but I don't think the Bucks say yes here, with Maker there and looking like a nice piece going forward, do they really give up Middleton for a center? I can get behind using Jabari in a trade but I don't see them giving up Middleton unless it's for an overpay.
For the Cavs that's way too many players incoming and they don't have the roster spots for that, easy fix of rerouting pieces, but a small problem nonetheless.
For LA I think it's also a no. This is a lateral move at best while getting rid of any youth they have on the team. I'd rather keep Jordan and see how the year goes.
For the Cavs that's way too many players incoming and they don't have the roster spots for that, easy fix of rerouting pieces, but a small problem nonetheless.
For LA I think it's also a no. This is a lateral move at best while getting rid of any youth they have on the team. I'd rather keep Jordan and see how the year goes.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Return to Trades and Transactions