R-DAWG wrote:jdm3 wrote:R-DAWG wrote:
They aren't terrible contracts. They are half a year away from being expiring contracts. That's the price of doing business to get that Brooklyn pick. Good luck trying to get a better asset than that for Kemba.
Who knows if the Brooklyn pick is a great asset or not. All I know is it could be a early teens pick and a worthless player on a bad contract for Kemba. The Hornets goal is not to help Cleveland win it this year. Their goal is to become a better team down the road and there is nothing in this deal that will for sure put them on that path.
again, thats the cost of doing business. There is no guarantee with any pick. The point guard market is thin and Kemba is a very good but not great player. Outside of CLE which win now team is going to give up a ton of value for 1.5 years of Kemba, who is 27.
I don't know who will but that is fine. If it comes to it I would rather keep Kemba than make this move. Eating cap with a wasted spot and losing Kemba doesn't make sense to where the team wants to go. If the pick lands in the top 5 I would feel we missed out but if it lands anywhere for 8 down then I wouldn't consider passing very bad at all. At least we wouldn't be stuck with another bad contract. If you are starting a rebuild you need something to rebuild around on this doesn't assure that so it could be giving your only asset away for nothing.