RealGM

MIN: Ryan Anderson, Wesley Johnson, Patrick Beverly, and Milwaukee's 2019 First Round Draft Pick*
OUT: Jeff Teague, Taj Gibson, and Minnesota's 2019 First Round Draft Pick**

Why for Minnesota? Balance the roster with more shooting and defense. "Kick the can" on a late first.

Patrick Beverly / Tyus Jones
Andrew Wiggins / Derrick Rose / Josh Okogie
Jimmy Butler / James Nunnally / Wesley Johnson
Anthony Tolliver / Ryan Anderson / Keita Baites-Diop
Karl-Anthony Towns / Gorgui Dieng / Justin Patton

Why not for Minnesota? If Patrick Beverly comes back worse than he was before, Minnesota would be in rough shape; this further hurts their post-defense and gets them stuck with Anderson's albatross contract.


PHX: Jeff Teague
OUT: Ryan Anderson and Milwaukee's 2019 First Round Draft Pick*

Why for Phoenix? Gain a legitimate, starting-caliber Point-Guard. Get out of Ryan Anderson's albatross for a player that is overpaid, but very productive.

Jeff Teague / De'Anthony Melton / Elie Okobo / Shaquille Harrison
Devin Booker / Mikal Bridges / Troy Daniels
Trevor Ariza / T.J. Warren / Davon Reed
Josh Jackson / Dragan Bender / Richaun Holmes
Deandre Ayton / Tyson Chandler

Why not for Phoenix? They could decide they don't want to try to jump to the Playoffs this season, and would prefer to hold onto the pick.


LAC: Taj Gibson and Minnesota's 2019 First Round Draft Pick**
OUT: Wesley Johnson and Patrick Beverly

Why for Los Angeles? Potentially obtain a First-Round Draft-Pick. Clear the glut at guards a bit.

Why not for Los Angeles? First potentially will not convey if Minnesota gets injured.

*Milwaukee's 1st round pick protected for selections 1-3 and 17-30 in 2019 and 1-7 in 2020 and unprotected in 2021
** Minnesota's 1st round pick protected for selections 1-20. If not conveyed, becomes Miami's 2019 Second Round Draft Pick.

Swap Bev with Milos or Evans and sure.

I don't get why Minny wants to weaken their big man rotation this year for that Bucks 1st. I'd much rather see if I could talk the Clippers into Teague+the pick+a couple min fillers for Beverley/Johnson/Boban(filler). Beverley fits the lineup much better than Teague and it really helps the payroll issues moving forward. And heck Wesley Johnson actually upgrades the wing rotation.

Clippers get an upgrade at PG for a couple years and a 1st round pick for taking on that 2nd year of Teague.

Texas Chuck wrote:I don't get why Minny wants to weaken their big man rotation this year for that Bucks 1st. I'd much rather see if I could talk the Clippers into Teague+the pick+a couple min fillers for Beverley/Johnson/Boban(filler). Beverley fits the lineup much better than Teague and it really helps the payroll issues moving forward. And heck Wesley Johnson actually upgrades the wing rotation.

Clippers get an upgrade at PG for a couple years and a 1st round pick for taking on that 2nd year of Teague.

Agree more with this. I don't think the Suns fit, but there's probably something to talk about there between just MN and LAC.

Phoenix just added the versatile Melton to Okobo and 2nd year pg Shaq Harrison all capable pg's on a young fast paced lottery team. Teague is the last type of guy I'd want on that roster in PHO right now.

Texas Chuck wrote:I don't get why Minny wants to weaken their big man rotation this year for that Bucks 1st. I'd much rather see if I could talk the Clippers into Teague+the pick+a couple min fillers for Beverley/Johnson/Boban(filler). Beverley fits the lineup much better than Teague and it really helps the payroll issues moving forward. And heck Wesley Johnson actually upgrades the wing rotation.

Clippers get an upgrade at PG for a couple years and a 1st round pick for taking on that 2nd year of Teague.

It's going to take a few firsts & Patton for the Clippers to even consider that. Personally would rather have Bev and Boban over Teague as well.

ejftw wrote:

Texas Chuck wrote:I don't get why Minny wants to weaken their big man rotation this year for that Bucks 1st. I'd much rather see if I could talk the Clippers into Teague+the pick+a couple min fillers for Beverley/Johnson/Boban(filler). Beverley fits the lineup much better than Teague and it really helps the payroll issues moving forward. And heck Wesley Johnson actually upgrades the wing rotation.

Clippers get an upgrade at PG for a couple years and a 1st round pick for taking on that 2nd year of Teague.

It's going to take a few firsts & Patton for the Clippers to even consider that. Personally would rather have Bev and Boban over Teague as well.

Please don't make unreasonable counters as it violates board policy. Feel free instead to simply say I'm not personally interested in taking on Teague's final year for a protected 1st. That's perfectly reasonable. Asking for multiple firsts and Patton isn't.

Texas Chuck wrote:

ejftw wrote:

Texas Chuck wrote:I don't get why Minny wants to weaken their big man rotation this year for that Bucks 1st. I'd much rather see if I could talk the Clippers into Teague+the pick+a couple min fillers for Beverley/Johnson/Boban(filler). Beverley fits the lineup much better than Teague and it really helps the payroll issues moving forward. And heck Wesley Johnson actually upgrades the wing rotation.

Clippers get an upgrade at PG for a couple years and a 1st round pick for taking on that 2nd year of Teague.

It's going to take a few firsts & Patton for the Clippers to even consider that. Personally would rather have Bev and Boban over Teague as well.

Please don't make unreasonable counters as it violates board policy. Feel free instead to simply say I'm not personally interested in taking on Teague's final year for a protected 1st. That's perfectly reasonable. Asking for multiple firsts and Patton isn't.

It isn't a counter, it's what it is going to take.

If that is also an unreasonable counter, as is your post of expecting the Clippers to take on that albatross for a protected first to the OP, so I suppose you also violated said policy.

I like the trade for Phx. I think the Clippers are doing really well here as well, Bev is not in the future plans with Shai in tow... Gibson would be a great mentor to have around for the kids and between he, the 40 games they get from Danillo and Tobias they should remain competitive even if they have a terrible record.

Just not sure I see the point in the trade for Minnesota. Ryan Anderson/Towns would get dominated inside. I like the guard/wing defense but I don't think that makes up for replacing Gibson with Anderson. The 1st is nice as well, but if this is the plan then I think you need to follow it up with trading Jimmy for younger assets.

ejftw wrote:
If that is also an unreasonable counter, as is your post of expecting the Clippers to take on that albatross for a protected first to the OP, so I suppose you also violated said policy.

I mean if this is an honest value take of yours, okay I suppose.

But I'm struggling with taking on one year of Teague as being a true albatross worth 2 firsts and a reasonable prospect especially when Teague is the best player in the trade.

Texas Chuck wrote:

ejftw wrote:
If that is also an unreasonable counter, as is your post of expecting the Clippers to take on that albatross for a protected first to the OP, so I suppose you also violated said policy.

I mean if this is an honest value take of yours, okay I suppose.

But I'm struggling with taking on one year of Teague as being a true albatross worth 2 firsts and a reasonable prospect especially when Teague is the best player in the trade.

So then what you are saying is Teague is worth sacrificing $19M in cap space, taking the front office outside of their goals unless Harris is renounced, and Harris would clearly be preferred to Teague. Not to mention how Teague would stunt the growth of SEGA and how Beverly is a much better mentor for him, and Bev has been exceptional off the court during the summer. I haven't heard much of Teague pumping himself and team up for the coming season.

ejftw wrote:

Texas Chuck wrote:

ejftw wrote:
If that is also an unreasonable counter, as is your post of expecting the Clippers to take on that albatross for a protected first to the OP, so I suppose you also violated said policy.

I mean if this is an honest value take of yours, okay I suppose.

But I'm struggling with taking on one year of Teague as being a true albatross worth 2 firsts and a reasonable prospect especially when Teague is the best player in the trade.

So then what you are saying is Teague is worth sacrificing $19M in cap space, taking the front office outside of their goals unless Harris is renounced, and Harris would clearly be preferred to Teague. Not to mention how Teague would stunt the growth of SEGA and how Beverly is a much better mentor for him, and Bev has been exceptional off the court during the summer. I haven't heard much of Teague pumping himself and team up for the coming season.

No I am talking about value. If you want to argue fit that's totally different and I'm cool with your takes from a Clippers perspective. But that's totally different from saying the price to take on Teague's last year is 2 firsts and Patton. If you aren't interested in taking him on for the reasons above, then just say that. And my response would be alright, cool.

Now hopefully we can move on as I've made my point about the importance of serious valuation on the board and you've made your point about why you don't like the idea. I can handle that. Lots of my ideas aren't great and I have no problems accepting that.

Thibs is looking to win now and this deal makes Minnesota moderately worse. There isn't any money savings and the pick swap is relatively neutral in value, so I'm struggling to see the incentive for the Wolves.

RipPizzaGuy wrote:I like the trade for Phx. I think the Clippers are doing really well here as well, Bev is not in the future plans with Shai in tow... Gibson would be a great mentor to have around for the kids and between he, the 40 games they get from Danillo and Tobias they should remain competitive even if they have a terrible record.

Just not sure I see the point in the trade for Minnesota. Ryan Anderson/Towns would get dominated inside. I like the guard/wing defense but I don't think that makes up for replacing Gibson with Anderson. The 1st is nice as well, but if this is the plan then I think you need to follow it up with trading Jimmy for younger assets.

Beverly is a long term fit if he wants to stay. Even if SGA surpasses him to start this year Beverly is the perfect backup to help him grow.

If I'm the Suns, I'd prefer to trade a protected first for Beverly. I know opinions on Teague differ but I really can't see trading a first for the right to pay a replacement-level PG $19 million per over the next two years.

Wow, this looks like a huge slam dunk win for LAC.

I love me some Trojans in Taj Gibson, who's a hardnosed player thats always useful on the court. Getting any FRP for PatBev is the best the LAC can expect. WeJo is whatever salary filler. If i'm the Clips i'd then try to spin Taj elsewhere for another SRP, with Montrezl on the roster, there's no point carrying the both of them..... or trade Trez for the best assets they can get back since he's on a lovely 2 yr 12mil deal. Taj is expiring so it helps their 2019 2 max plan, if they're serious about that.

For the other teams, i can see how it works. TWolves want more shooting and lower usage 3D PG. PHX wants to compete now by getting a real starting quality PG for a big man who might steal too much PT from the kids. The MIL FRP might not convey so just send it out and get some short term piece that can help alot.

Clearly LAC is biggest winners while MIN/PHX need to think long and hard if the gambles are worth it.

TheNewEra wrote:

RipPizzaGuy wrote:I like the trade for Phx. I think the Clippers are doing really well here as well, Bev is not in the future plans with Shai in tow... Gibson would be a great mentor to have around for the kids and between he, the 40 games they get from Danillo and Tobias they should remain competitive even if they have a terrible record.

Just not sure I see the point in the trade for Minnesota. Ryan Anderson/Towns would get dominated inside. I like the guard/wing defense but I don't think that makes up for replacing Gibson with Anderson. The 1st is nice as well, but if this is the plan then I think you need to follow it up with trading Jimmy for younger assets.

Beverly is a long term fit if he wants to stay. Even if SGA surpasses him to start this year Beverly is the perfect backup to help him grow.

If Beverly is healthy hes going to be looking to get paid after being on that bargain contract. If shai progresses I see absolutely no way west ties up that much money into a backup pg.

Sent from my SM-N950U1 using RealGM mobile app

wolves_89 wrote:Thibs is looking to win now and this deal makes Minnesota moderately worse. There isn't any money savings and the pick swap is relatively neutral in value, so I'm struggling to see the incentive for the Wolves.

Bev improves the defense (needed), Anderson gives us shooting (needed), Wes comes home and gives us wing depth (needed). The trade addresses needs and improves roster balance and gets rid of Jeff Teague. I like it.

Vae Victus wrote:Wow, this looks like a huge slam dunk win for LAC.

I love me some Trojans in Taj Gibson, who's a hardnosed player thats always useful on the court. Getting any FRP for PatBev is the best the LAC can expect. WeJo is whatever salary filler. If i'm the Clips i'd then try to spin Taj elsewhere for another SRP, with Montrezl on the roster, there's no point carrying the both of them..... or trade Trez for the best assets they can get back since he's on a lovely 2 yr 12mil deal. Taj is expiring so it helps their 2019 2 max plan, if they're serious about that.

For the other teams, i can see how it works. TWolves want more shooting and lower usage 3D PG. PHX wants to compete now by getting a real starting quality PG for a big man who might steal too much PT from the kids. The MIL FRP might not convey so just send it out and get some short term piece that can help alot.

Clearly LAC is biggest winners while MIN/PHX need to think long and hard if the gambles are worth it.

Truth be told, I was kind of thinking Los Angeles should just get two seconds, as opposed to a first, but I didn't want to seem overly greedy.

jbk1234 wrote:If I'm the Suns, I'd prefer to trade a protected first for Beverly. I know opinions on Teague differ but I really can't see trading a first for the right to pay a replacement-level PG $19 million per over the next two years.

The Ryan Anderson inclusion is a big reason for the value being a late-first, in my opinion.

I think this trade does a lot of good things, moving many players to teams where they are better fits and have more value. Teague would do wonders for developing PHX youth, and he is a bit wasted in MIN. Ryan Anderson is less of a liability in MIN, where he is a vet that could stretch the floor. This would have worked even better if MIN hadn’t spent it’s off-season money on Tolliver. Patrick Beverley, if healthy, is a better fit for MIN than in LAC this season.

However, while I can see a trade like this in the abstract, I just can’t see Thibs agreeing to trade two of his starters, especially Taj. The rest of MIN’s roster does not contain contracts that allow the trade-matching flexibility that would be needed for big trades, so I imagine MIN will bring back basically the same team for the rest of this season. Good trade though, Domejandro.
.