I mean the cost of dumping long-term money, or even short-term money ahead of free agency, doesn't change. If the Heat don't pay it to Philly, they still have to pay it to someone and no team is taking Waiters or JJ for a second. So the sweetener should really be on top of the cost of clearing that space, not instead of it.HartfordWhalers wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Assuming Whiteside opts in, if he hasn't already, the Heat need to clear $40M to offer Butler a max? The Nets need to renounce Russell and get someone to take one of their good role players. The Heat need to make it worth it for the Sixers.HartfordWhalers wrote:Here was my view on what was fair:
Waiters + Miami incentive to let’s say Atlanta
2nd rounder (and cash) to Philly
Butler to Miami.
If Miami needs more outgoing salary, just add more above to (Atlanta) and more incentive.
Basically, Miami might have to pay to dump salary but that is to dump salary. Philly should get almost nothing for Butler. The third team is added to make clear this distinction.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Oh,I'm not saying a sign and trade is easy for a team with a bunch of bad salary.
I am saying that a team should expect to get no more than a 2nd rounder for a free agent.
If they won't part with J. Rich, then maybe Dragic, JJ and 13 works. But they'd have to add a real asset.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app