Spurs out: Derozan + Spurs 2020 1st(lotto protected)
Spurs in: Blake Griffin
Pistons out: Blake Griffin
Pistons in: Jeff Teague + Spurs 2020 1st(lotto prot) + Pacers 2020 1st(1-14 prot) + Wolves 2020 1st(lotto prot)
Bucks out: Bledsoe + Ilyasova +Pacers 2020 1st
Bucks in: Derozan
Wolves out: Teague + Wolves 2020 1st(lotto protected for 3 years then 2 2nds)
Wolves in: Bledsoe + Ilyasova
Spurs get open minutes for Lonnie and the kids while getting a great fit.
Dejounte/White/Mills
Lonnie/Forbes/Belinelli
Carroll/Gay/Keldon
Blake/Lyles/Luka
LMA/Poeltl
Pistons cut A LOT of salary(91mil~) and get 3 picks to jumpstart the rebuild
Bucks get a legit #2 option
Wolves get an upgrade at PG who's locked in for years on a cheap deal plus a stretch 4 to soak some minutes. Having 2 cheap starters in Bledsoe and Covington helps mitigate Wiggin's contract and this should make them competitive for the playoffs.
Who says no?
Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,733
- And1: 2,232
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,892
- And1: 14,044
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
Detroit. Not inclined to trade Blake for a third point guard and three low firsts.
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,408
- And1: 4,686
- Joined: Jan 08, 2016
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
Bucks say no imo. DeRozan doesn't fit at all what the Bucks are trying to do. Bledsoe on defense is significantly more important than anything DeRozan can provide on offense.
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,207
- And1: 1,163
- Joined: May 14, 2016
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
I think and hope the wolves decline. Bledsoe's age and 4 year contract dont really fit Minn timeline. Its likely the wheels are coming off his bus about the time KAT is thinking about his next contract. And firsts are very valuble to a team that struggles to attract FAs.
Wolves are not under that much pressure to find a teague replacement. Culver has looked good on ball and wolves should have a lottery pick in a draft that is knee deep in pg types.
The trade could make sense if the wolves had a 1-2 year horizon, but they dont.
Wolves are not under that much pressure to find a teague replacement. Culver has looked good on ball and wolves should have a lottery pick in a draft that is knee deep in pg types.
The trade could make sense if the wolves had a 1-2 year horizon, but they dont.
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,301
- And1: 3,963
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
I can't see the Wolves trading a 1st to exchange Teague for Bledsoe. The Wolves are looking to build a sustainable competitive team and trading for a guy who is almost 30 and signed for 4 seasons doesn't really fit with the direction of the franchise. Rosas has made it pretty clear he's looking for stars, young talent with upside, or cheap vets and Bledsoe is none of those things.
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
- skones
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,977
- And1: 17,105
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves
Bledsoe is better than Derozan. Zero idea as to why Milwaukee is adding value.
This is DOA.
This is DOA.
Return to Trades and Transactions