Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

Mykhyn
General Manager
Posts: 9,733
And1: 2,232
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
 

Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#1 » by Mykhyn » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:30 pm

Spurs out: Derozan + Spurs 2020 1st(lotto protected)
Spurs in: Blake Griffin

Pistons out: Blake Griffin
Pistons in: Jeff Teague + Spurs 2020 1st(lotto prot) + Pacers 2020 1st(1-14 prot) + Wolves 2020 1st(lotto prot)

Bucks out: Bledsoe + Ilyasova +Pacers 2020 1st
Bucks in: Derozan

Wolves out: Teague + Wolves 2020 1st(lotto protected for 3 years then 2 2nds)
Wolves in: Bledsoe + Ilyasova

Spurs get open minutes for Lonnie and the kids while getting a great fit.
Dejounte/White/Mills
Lonnie/Forbes/Belinelli
Carroll/Gay/Keldon
Blake/Lyles/Luka
LMA/Poeltl

Pistons cut A LOT of salary(91mil~) and get 3 picks to jumpstart the rebuild

Bucks get a legit #2 option

Wolves get an upgrade at PG who's locked in for years on a cheap deal plus a stretch 4 to soak some minutes. Having 2 cheap starters in Bledsoe and Covington helps mitigate Wiggin's contract and this should make them competitive for the playoffs.


Who says no?
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 40,892
And1: 14,044
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek

Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#2 » by Laimbeer » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:36 pm

Detroit. Not inclined to trade Blake for a third point guard and three low firsts.
LuessiT
RealGM
Posts: 11,408
And1: 4,686
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#3 » by LuessiT » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:38 pm

Bucks say no imo. DeRozan doesn't fit at all what the Bucks are trying to do. Bledsoe on defense is significantly more important than anything DeRozan can provide on offense.
SmokeyPaw
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 1,163
Joined: May 14, 2016
 

Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#4 » by SmokeyPaw » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:44 pm

I think and hope the wolves decline. Bledsoe's age and 4 year contract dont really fit Minn timeline. Its likely the wheels are coming off his bus about the time KAT is thinking about his next contract. And firsts are very valuble to a team that struggles to attract FAs.

Wolves are not under that much pressure to find a teague replacement. Culver has looked good on ball and wolves should have a lottery pick in a draft that is knee deep in pg types.

The trade could make sense if the wolves had a 1-2 year horizon, but they dont.
wolves_89
Head Coach
Posts: 7,301
And1: 3,963
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#5 » by wolves_89 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:35 am

I can't see the Wolves trading a 1st to exchange Teague for Bledsoe. The Wolves are looking to build a sustainable competitive team and trading for a guy who is almost 30 and signed for 4 seasons doesn't really fit with the direction of the franchise. Rosas has made it pretty clear he's looking for stars, young talent with upside, or cheap vets and Bledsoe is none of those things.
User avatar
skones
RealGM
Posts: 36,977
And1: 17,105
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: Milwaukee
       

Re: Spurs-Pistons-Bucks-Wolves 

Post#6 » by skones » Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:10 am

Bledsoe is better than Derozan. Zero idea as to why Milwaukee is adding value.

This is DOA.

Return to Trades and Transactions