dalton749 wrote:Anyone else feel like fans of tanking teams are insufferable here?
No. And we aren't real big on negative generalizations here.
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
dalton749 wrote:Anyone else feel like fans of tanking teams are insufferable here?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:
Death Lineup's rumor about Dipo and the Bucks seems to have even more traction. I poo-pooed it but I shouldn't have it.
pacers33granger wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
Death Lineup's rumor about Dipo and the Bucks seems to have even more traction. I poo-pooed it but I shouldn't have it.
Seems a risky bet for Milwaukee, but I would assume Dipo is the potentially cheapest "star" out there and they aren't flush with assets.
I'm not sure if they could do anything to make Indy interested though. We'd have less than no use for Bledsoe and doesn't seem like they could get much value from a 3rd team for him. Donte and our first back are basically all that's left and that's a super underwhelming package.
NYG wrote:pacers33granger wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
Death Lineup's rumor about Dipo and the Bucks seems to have even more traction. I poo-pooed it but I shouldn't have it.
Seems a risky bet for Milwaukee, but I would assume Dipo is the potentially cheapest "star" out there and they aren't flush with assets.
I'm not sure if they could do anything to make Indy interested though. We'd have less than no use for Bledsoe and doesn't seem like they could get much value from a 3rd team for him. Donte and our first back are basically all that's left and that's a super underwhelming package.
Would a KCP/Bledsoe back-court be fine?
Danny Green, DiVincenzo and 24 for Oladipo?
(Bledsoe to LA Lakers)
Which teams are in need of savings most likely this off-season, either because of the following reasons...
1. They've painted themselves into a bad corner for a team that either currently or soon-to-be via extensions is going to cost a ton without a realistic shot at a championship.
2. Are into or after extensions/re-signings/draft picks will be into the luxury tax.
3. Are either historically frugal owners that could use the landscape as an excuse or actually took a really bad hit in the current market.
A team has to meet at least one of those criteria to make deals that you can suck value from salary cap savings.
A few I see...
Boston - Luxury Tax/Not Enough Roster Spots for all of their picks any way
Houston - Took a very known beating financially
Orlando - If they want to keep Fultz and Isaac, it's time to start analyzing their long-term cap projections versus how competitive this roster can be
Philadelphia - This is the prime example of reason #1 above
Sacramento - After re-signing Bogdanovic, they start becoming an expensive team
pacers33granger wrote:NYG wrote:pacers33granger wrote:
Seems a risky bet for Milwaukee, but I would assume Dipo is the potentially cheapest "star" out there and they aren't flush with assets.
I'm not sure if they could do anything to make Indy interested though. We'd have less than no use for Bledsoe and doesn't seem like they could get much value from a 3rd team for him. Donte and our first back are basically all that's left and that's a super underwhelming package.
Would a KCP/Bledsoe back-court be fine?
Danny Green, DiVincenzo and 24 for Oladipo?
(Bledsoe to LA Lakers)
Don't really see the incentive for Indy though.
NYG wrote:pacers33granger wrote:NYG wrote:
Would a KCP/Bledsoe back-court be fine?
Danny Green, DiVincenzo and 24 for Oladipo?
(Bledsoe to LA Lakers)
Don't really see the incentive for Indy though.
Me neither, but for the Oladipo to Bucks rumors to be true, doesn't it inherently have to be an underwhelming deal? Whether it's true is another thing, but if it is then I imagine it either being a bigger deal involving Middleton somehow or a deal that has Pacers fans saying that they don't see the incentive for Indy based on Milwaukee's assets they can offer.
Scoot McGroot wrote:
Or, it's just the rumor of keep an eye on Milwaukee in regards to Oladipo, and not a real report.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Scoot McGroot wrote:
Or, it's just the rumor of keep an eye on Milwaukee in regards to Oladipo, and not a real report.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:I look at several teams and keep thinking man what they really need is a player like Maxi Kleber: Golden State, Minnesota, Indiana, Brooklyn, Houston, Clippers, Pelicans, Bucks, Suns are all teams I've played around with constructing deals and I keep thinking Maxi Kleber fits perfectly into this. Then I think of my little Mavs and don't want to consider dealing him with my KP injury fears.
So am I just a raging Maxi homer?
If not and I'm on to something should Dallas cash out on his value?
Nobody cares but you Chuck?
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
gswhoops wrote:KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:All Westbrook trades should be DOA imo. Nobody wants to offer anything, they just want a top 10-15 player in the league for cap space. Houston didn't make that trade a year ago just to throw him away, along with any chance at getting Harden a title, a year later.
I'll see your take and raise you; 80% of trades here where the rationale for the other team is "saving money" are just excuses to add talent to your team for below market rate.
Texas Chuck wrote:I look at several teams and keep thinking man what they really need is a player like Maxi Kleber: Golden State, Minnesota, Indiana, Brooklyn, Houston, Clippers, Pelicans, Bucks, Suns are all teams I've played around with constructing deals and I keep thinking Maxi Kleber fits perfectly into this. Then I think of my little Mavs and don't want to consider dealing him with my KP injury fears.
So am I just a raging Maxi homer?
If not and I'm on to something should Dallas cash out on his value?
Nobody cares but you Chuck?
pacers33granger wrote:because of the disappointment of Marquis Daniels.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:pacers33granger wrote:because of the disappointment of Marquis Daniels.
Dallas fans don't remember that deal fondly either though by the time we dealt him he was already a disappointment after the magical way his career exploded onto the scene late his rookie year. And I didn't mind Austin too bad. But Daniels was such a fun player with his ability to get into the lane at will at like 1/4 speed and he was such a good passer.
Texas Chuck wrote:I look at several teams and keep thinking man what they really need is a player like Maxi Kleber: Golden State, Minnesota, Indiana, Brooklyn, Houston, Clippers, Pelicans, Bucks, Suns are all teams I've played around with constructing deals and I keep thinking Maxi Kleber fits perfectly into this. Then I think of my little Mavs and don't want to consider dealing him with my KP injury fears.
So am I just a raging Maxi homer?
If not and I'm on to something should Dallas cash out on his value?
Nobody cares but you Chuck?
pacers33granger wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:pacers33granger wrote:because of the disappointment of Marquis Daniels.
Dallas fans don't remember that deal fondly either though by the time we dealt him he was already a disappointment after the magical way his career exploded onto the scene late his rookie year. And I didn't mind Austin too bad. But Daniels was such a fun player with his ability to get into the lane at will at like 1/4 speed and he was such a good passer.
Yeah the few games he actually played in for us he was super unique and fun to watch. You just knew he was going to miss 10 for that 1 game though. It also ended up basically just extending Croshere's bad deal a few more years IIRC, though he was a good dude and tried.
Scoot McGroot wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I look at several teams and keep thinking man what they really need is a player like Maxi Kleber: Golden State, Minnesota, Indiana, Brooklyn, Houston, Clippers, Pelicans, Bucks, Suns are all teams I've played around with constructing deals and I keep thinking Maxi Kleber fits perfectly into this. Then I think of my little Mavs and don't want to consider dealing him with my KP injury fears.
So am I just a raging Maxi homer?
If not and I'm on to something should Dallas cash out on his value?
Nobody cares but you Chuck?
Do you picture Kleiber in Indy as a Turner replacement, or do you think he adds a lot and is a need while Turner/Sabonis are already there? And with Goga too?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Return to Trades and Transactions