Fred for LaVine
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Fred for LaVine
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,256
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 15, 2020
Fred for LaVine
LaVine hypothetically wants out. He is sick of Chicago and losing.
Fred is from Rockford. Basically label him hometown hero.
Straight swap who says no?
Which side needs to add more value?
FVV is better all around while Zach is an all offense, little defense guy.
FVV is the career winner while Zach has been a career loser.
Zach has better stats while FVV has worse stats.
Carter
Markken
Porter
White
FVV
Siakam
OG
Powell
LaVine
Lowry
Does this work?
Fred is from Rockford. Basically label him hometown hero.
Straight swap who says no?
Which side needs to add more value?
FVV is better all around while Zach is an all offense, little defense guy.
FVV is the career winner while Zach has been a career loser.
Zach has better stats while FVV has worse stats.
Carter
Markken
Porter
White
FVV
Siakam
OG
Powell
LaVine
Lowry
Does this work?
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,905
- And1: 899
- Joined: May 23, 2006
Re: Fred for LaVine
Chicago easily says no.
Re: Fred for LaVine
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,813
- And1: 88,824
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: Fred for LaVine
I'm a huge Fred guy. I'm well known as the board's biggest LaVine skeptic. I would rather have FVV on my team than LaVine.
But Toronto has to add real value here. I wouldn't do it, but I think the league values LaVine meaningfully more than FVV even if I do not.
But Toronto has to add real value here. I wouldn't do it, but I think the league values LaVine meaningfully more than FVV even if I do not.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,572
- And1: 32,156
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Fred for LaVine
I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,423
- And1: 10,789
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Fred for LaVine
LaVine does not want out of Chicago. Chicago says no.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,256
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 15, 2020
Re: Fred for LaVine
jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,572
- And1: 32,156
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Fred for LaVine
pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
That I might consider if I were the Bulls.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Fred for LaVine
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,813
- And1: 88,824
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: Fred for LaVine
pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
massive overcorrection.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,572
- And1: 32,156
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Fred for LaVine
Texas Chuck wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
massive overcorrection.
I disagree. I think it depends on how you value OG's trade value on his extension. I have it as good but not great. I'm also not sure that the Raptors want to lock themselves into that roster after they pay Powell with very little wiggle room going forward.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,905
- And1: 899
- Joined: May 23, 2006
Re: Fred for LaVine
pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Bulls need quality over quantity. Still a no from Chicago.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,324
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Fred for LaVine
pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Thats illegal (too much incoming salary to raptors) and a terrible deal for raptors
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,207
- And1: 1,163
- Joined: May 14, 2016
Re: Fred for LaVine
Think thats an overpay by Toronto.pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Re: Fred for LaVine
- BoyzNTheHood
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,855
- And1: 5,733
- Joined: Apr 19, 2015
Re: Fred for LaVine
gobullschi wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think the Bulls consider this without draft capital attached. LaVine isn't playing alongside of Siakam, OG, Powell, or Lowry. I think Lowry is already fading so I'd rank him fourth on that list but I'm not sure there's another Bulls player on the roster who presently adds as much on-the-court value as Lowry. If the Bulls do this swap, it's back to the bottom and I just don't see them doing that.
What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Bulls need quality over quantity. Still a no from Chicago.
What does this even mean? OG Anunoby isn't just a throw in. His addition makes the deal too sweet for Chicago.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,905
- And1: 899
- Joined: May 23, 2006
Re: Fred for LaVine
BoyzNTheHood wrote:gobullschi wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:What if it's Fred and OG for LaVine and Otto Porter?
Bulls need quality over quantity. Still a no from Chicago.
What does this even mean? OG Anunoby isn't just a throw in. His addition makes the deal too sweet for Chicago.
It means the Bulls would rather have the best player in the deal, than move him for 2 lower quality players.
Re: Fred for LaVine
- BoyzNTheHood
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,855
- And1: 5,733
- Joined: Apr 19, 2015
Re: Fred for LaVine
gobullschi wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:gobullschi wrote:
Bulls need quality over quantity. Still a no from Chicago.
What does this even mean? OG Anunoby isn't just a throw in. His addition makes the deal too sweet for Chicago.
It means the Bulls would rather have the best player in the deal, than move him for 2 lower quality players.
If you read the OP you would realize that this deal is based on Lavine hypothetically wanting out of Chicago.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 35,089
- And1: 64,652
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
Re: Fred for LaVine
There is a pretty big value gap between the two. Also its pretty disingenuous to say FVV is a career winner while LaVine is a career loser. Last time I checked, LaVine has never gotten to play alongside Kawhi/Siakam/Lowry. Lets see LaVine has gotten to play with KAT/Wiggins, then Lauri/Otto Porter? Not really a fair comparison there.
TOR would have to include a good amount of draft assets to make this swap work.
TOR would have to include a good amount of draft assets to make this swap work.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,256
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 15, 2020
Re: Fred for LaVine
So FVV alone is too little. With OG too much. How about Powell and FVV?
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,905
- And1: 899
- Joined: May 23, 2006
Re: Fred for LaVine
I think any deal for LaVine would need to include Siakom.
Re: Fred for LaVine
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,288
- And1: 28,273
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: Fred for LaVine
Lavine is considered a lot more valuable, to the point where it's completely counterproductive for the raps to create a package and stay competitive.
Return to Trades and Transactions