[Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
[Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
[Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,008
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Damn Gafford went cheap.. would have loved him here. Great move for WSH. Still no idea what CHI is doing today
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,234
- And1: 97,923
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
I like Gafford so I like this for the Wiz. Brown is worth a shot so I don't mind this for Chicago now that they have Vuc effectively blocking him.
Good solid deal.
Good solid deal.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- Kurt Heimlich
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,932
- And1: 5,562
- Joined: Jun 26, 2001
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
I liked Brown but looks like he's struggling in limited time this year? Hutch has been a lost cause so swapping him for Brown at least gives us a knew hope as a young wing project. The Bulls aren't giving up much (Gafford is a decent albeit very limited backup big I guess) so sure why not.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,812
- And1: 11,658
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Seems like a good prospect re-balancing. Feel like we don't see enough of these deals.
I bought a boat.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- Chicago-Bull-E
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,230
- And1: 7,538
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Like this a lot. Gafford has been in the doghouse and Hutch hasn’t been with the team for undisclosed reasons for months now.
Wagner’s stats look good, what’s his deal?
Wagner’s stats look good, what’s his deal?
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,744
- And1: 396
- Joined: Jun 12, 2007
- Location: Grand Rapids
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
No room for Gafford now that Vuc is coming over. I think Chicago is having an awesome trade deadline day. Very interesting moves.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,953
- And1: 10,243
- Joined: May 01, 2010
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Troy Brown and Chandler Hutchison are both great buy low candidates. Like this for both sides, assuming they both get PT now.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,974
- And1: 1,026
- Joined: Feb 22, 2016
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
I like Gafford a lot, but it seems Billy does not, so this isn't a huge surprise. Both Hutch and Brown could sure use changes of scenery. This looks to be solid for both sides.
Greatest Bulls of All Time: 1. TONY SNELL 2. Jordan 3. Pippen 4. Rose 5. Gilmore
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,908
- And1: 2,334
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Gafford didn't progress this year from last, that's why Thad Young started playing center. Inconsistent and lacking offense are his issues. Hutchison was constantly getting injured and hasn't played of late this year for unstated personal reasons
Brown didn't look too bad against the Bulls, he'll get some minutes behind Williams and if he shows something maybe they can move either Markkanen or Young and let PW get more time at the PF.
Brown didn't look too bad against the Bulls, he'll get some minutes behind Williams and if he shows something maybe they can move either Markkanen or Young and let PW get more time at the PF.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 69,630
- And1: 22,024
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
Wagner's 4th year was already declined so he is an UFA this summer. So the deal is basically Brown for Gafford. I like it for both teams. Each player has talent and potential, but could use a change of scenery.
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: [Wojnarowski]: WAS/CHI
I like this one. Both guys have some shine but never seemed to get in their respective coach's good graces (and Gafford was about to lose whatever minutes he was getting).
Makes sense scenery-wise, makes sense position-wise.
Makes sense scenery-wise, makes sense position-wise.
Return to Trades and Transactions