Texas Chuck wrote:gswhoops wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:
I think this is ok, I believe K chile was asking whether say Clippers could ask Sonics to claim Kemba and then agree to trade for him, which I'm not sure is allowed
It’s a gray area but I don’t think it’s strictly tampering because Kemba isn’t under contract with Seattle. I could see how it might be considered a violation of the spirit of the tampering rules though (and I think there’s a catch all provision in the CBA to that effect)
I guess my question is why they wouldn’t just deal with Boston directly.
Well one reason is a win now team like Boston would likely want a different trade package than an expansion team who probably could care less what players they get, only the assets they could pull.
Exactly, my bad idea was get them to take Wiggins and send Wall with some stuff for Wiggins, since the rockets now have Cade in this exercise and would want he and KPJ to have the ball as much as possible
Edit: though I just realized this would be essentially the same for Seattle as just taking on wall for assets, so that's the kind of asset price they should be asking for, so nevermind, this was a particularly bad idea even for me lol